---
title: Houthi Rebels Sink Two Ships in Red Sea as Ukraine Expands Anti-Russia Operations in Africa
description: "In a dramatic escalation of Red Sea violence, Yemen's Houthi rebels have sunk two commercial vessels in sophisticated coordinated attacks, killing multiple crew members and demonstrating enhanced military capabilities despite sustained bombardment from Israel and US-led coalition forces. The attacks on the Magic Seas and Eternity C represent a significant shift in both the technical sophistication and lethal intent of Houthi operations, threatening to disrupt one of the world's most critical shipping lanes. Meanwhile, Ukraine is expanding its presence across Africa, establishing new embassies and military partnerships in nations bordering Russian client states, opening a new front in its broader conflict with Moscow by targeting Russia's mercenary operations on the continent.\n\n## Key Takeaways\n\n- Yemen's Houthi rebels sank two commercial vessels (Magic Seas and Eternity C) in sophisticated coordinated attacks using manned speedboats, unmanned surface vessels, aerial drones, and missiles, killing multiple crew members in July 2025.\n- The attacks represent a significant escalation in Houthi capabilities and lethality, matching the total number of ships sunk and crew killed during their entire 2023-2024 campaign in just 48 hours.\n- Reports indicate the Houthis have formed an alliance with Somali terror group al-Shabaab, potentially expanding their operational range across the Gulf of Aden and threatening to close the Red Sea to commercial traffic entirely.\n- Ukraine is expanding its presence across Africa by opening eight new embassies and establishing military partnerships with nations like Mauritania that border Russian client states, offering drone technology and military training as alternatives to Russian mercenary operations.\n- Ukraine's African strategy aims to open a new front against Russia by targeting Russian mercenary forces and resource extraction operations that support Moscow's war effort, while providing humanitarian assistance that contrasts with Russian operations.\n\n## The Magic Seas Attack: A New Level of Houthi Coordination\n\nOn July 6th, the bulk carrier Magic Seas came under attack approximately fifty nautical miles southeast of the Yemeni port city of Hodeidah. The vessel, owned by a Greek shipping company and flying the Liberian flag, was sailing northbound toward the Saudi coast and Suez Canal carrying iron and fertilizer when Houthi forces launched their assault.\n\nThe attack unfolded in multiple waves, demonstrating unprecedented coordination and resource commitment from the Houthis. Initially, eight manned small boats approached the vessel, with fighters aboard carrying rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. These fighters fired on the Magic Seas but notably declined to board before departing. This initial assault was followed by a second wave consisting of four unmanned surface vessels—drone boats laden with explosives and coordinated remotely from shore.\n\nThese sea drones represent a particularly dangerous threat to both civilian and military vessels. They are extremely difficult to detect during approach and are designed to detonate at or below the waterline, virtually guaranteeing catastrophic hull breaches if they reach their target. An armed security team aboard the Magic Seas managed to destroy two of the incoming drone boats, but the remaining two struck the vessel successfully. With the ship taking on water, the crew was forced to evacuate and was eventually rescued by a passing vessel.\n\nAccording to Houthi rebel statements, the assault continued even after evacuation. The organization claimed to have attacked the abandoned vessel with missiles and aerial drones, then boarded it, planted explosives, and deliberately sunk it. Video footage appearing to validate these claims had emerged by the time of reporting. The commitment of eight manned boats, four unmanned surface vessels, missiles, and aerial drones to a single target represents an extraordinary allocation of resources for the Houthis, signaling what Martin Kelly, head of marine security company EOS Risk Group, characterized to the Financial Times as clear intent: \"They meant to sink this ship.\"\n\n## Israeli Retaliation and Houthi Counter-Strikes\n\nIsrael responded swiftly to the Magic Seas attack with airstrikes across three Yemeni port cities: Hodeidah, al-Salif, and Ras Isa. All three locations serve as centers of Houthi power and facilitate the trade and weapons smuggling operations that sustain the organization financially and militarily. Israeli forces also targeted a power station and the Galaxy Leader, a car-carrier trade ship that the Houthis had seized in late 2023 and converted into a propaganda showcase. Israel alleged that the captured vessel had been fitted with radar systems to help identify other commercial ships for targeting.\n\nThe Houthis claimed to have forced Israeli warplanes to retreat by launching anti-aircraft missiles, though the extent of Israel's successful strikes suggests these claims were exaggerated and that Israeli combat jets completed their missions largely unimpeded. Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree announced retaliatory launches of missiles and drones targeting Israel's Ben Gurion Airport, two ports, and a power station, though Israel reported no successful strikes from these counter-attacks.\n\nThe exchange highlighted a familiar pattern in the ongoing conflict: Israel possesses overwhelming air superiority and can strike Houthi targets with relative impunity, while Houthi long-range capabilities against Israeli territory remain largely ineffective. However, the Houthis' ability to continue operations against maritime targets despite sustained aerial bombardment demonstrates the limitations of airpower alone in neutralizing their threat to Red Sea shipping.\n\n## The Eternity C: A Deadlier Second Attack\n\nJust one day after the Magic Seas incident, a second bulk carrier came under Houthi attack in a location near the first strike. The Eternity C, also Greek-owned and Liberian-flagged, was heading northward toward the Suez Canal when Houthi forces launched their assault. The attack followed a similar pattern but with critical differences in execution and outcome.\n\nFour manned speedboats attacked the vessel simultaneously, striking it with rocket-propelled grenade and rifle fire. Several aerial drones then attacked from above, hitting the ship's deck rather than the waterline. Despite not breaching the hull below the waterline, the attack proved far more lethal to the crew than the previous day's assault. At least four crew members were killed and two others seriously injured in the strike. The ship's bridge sustained heavy damage, as did its lifeboats and telecommunications equipment, severely complicating evacuation efforts.\n\nThe Eternity C was attacked while far from military vessels patrolling the Red Sea as part of coalition operations, and rescue operations took over twenty-four hours to begin identifying survivors. Compounding the tragedy, the Houthis attacked the ship again after initial damage had been sustained, further endangering survivors and rescue efforts. At the time of reporting, only four crew members and one armed guard had been rescued after drifting in the water for over a day. The fate of other survivors remained unknown, with concerns that some may have still been aboard the vessel or potentially taken hostage during a Houthi boarding operation.\n\nSome sources reported the ship had sunk by the time of writing, though definitive confirmation was pending. The attack on the Eternity C marked a significant escalation in lethality—in just two days, the Houthis had matched the total number of ships sunk and crew members killed during their entire previous campaign from late 2023 through the end of 2024.\n\n## A Fundamental Shift in Houthi Tactics and Intent\n\nThe attacks on the Magic Seas and Eternity C represent more than isolated incidents—they signal a fundamental transformation in Houthi capabilities and strategic approach to Red Sea operations. Since beginning their campaign against international shipping in late 2023, the Houthis had previously sunk only two ships, captured one vessel, and killed four crew members total. The July 2025 attacks doubled the number of sunken vessels and significantly increased crew fatalities in just forty-eight hours.\n\nThe technical sophistication displayed in these operations demonstrates that the Houthis have mastered complex, multi-faceted attacks despite sustained bombardment from both Israeli forces and the US-led Operation Prosperity Guardian coalition. The coordination of manned speedboats, unmanned surface vessels, aerial drones, and missiles against single targets, followed by boarding operations and deliberate scuttling, represents a level of operational planning and resource commitment previously unseen in Houthi maritime operations.\n\nPerhaps most concerning is the apparent shift in targeting criteria. The Houthis have consistently claimed their attacks target only Israel and organizations with ties to the country. However, neither the Magic Seas nor the Eternity C had current Israeli connections, though at least one vessel had previously called at Israeli ports. This confirms long-held suspicions that Houthi targeting data may be outdated, fabricated to provide political cover, or that the organization has abandoned any pretense of selective targeting in favor of attacking vessels indiscriminately.\n\nThe attacks have already triggered market responses, with insurance premiums spiking in ways that will deter commercial vessels from transiting the Red Sea. This matters enormously because Houthi-controlled territory sits along one of the world's most critical trade waterways. Ships avoiding the Red Sea cannot access the Suez Canal, forcing them to circumnavigate Africa—a route that adds significant time and cost while creating downstream supply chain disruptions globally. Insurance premiums had previously spiked during the Houthis' 2023-2024 campaign, but the demonstrated lethality and determination of these new attacks threatens to close the Red Sea to commercial traffic entirely if just one or two more similar incidents occur.\n\n## The Houthi-Al-Shabaab Alliance: Expanding the Threat\n\nRecent reporting from multiple outlets has drawn attention to a developing alliance between the Houthis and al-Shabaab, the Somali terror group currently engaged in a complex offensive against Somalia's federal government. This partnership, operating from opposite shores of one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, introduces an additional layer of threat to maritime security in the region.\n\nAccording to these reports, the Houthis have begun supplying al-Shabaab with weapons extending beyond small arms to include drones and possibly guided missiles. In exchange, al-Shabaab provides support through its piracy networks, creating diversions and attracting coalition naval patrols away from areas where Houthi smugglers are attempting to reach Yemen's ports with weapons and supplies.\n\nThe alliance appears to have already produced tangible results. Al-Shabaab has reportedly received sniper rifles and light machine guns from Houthi sources, and both organizations have integrated themselves into larger supply chains running from the Middle East to the East African coast. According to United Nations assessments, al-Shabaab may be providing targeting data to the Houthis—a full one-third of Houthi attacks in the Gulf of Aden have targeted ships that should have been beyond the range of Houthi radar systems, suggesting external intelligence support. Al-Shabaab fighters have also been discovered smuggling kamikaze drones that appear to be of Houthi origin.\n\nIf the two groups coordinate attacks rather than merely sharing resources and intelligence, the entire lower Red Sea and much of the Gulf of Aden could fall within their combined operational range. This would eliminate the option for commercial vessels to simply hug the African coastline to stay beyond Houthi range, potentially forcing a complete rerouting of maritime traffic around the African continent with catastrophic implications for global supply chains and shipping costs.\n\n## Coalition Response Failures and Future Implications\n\nThe recent Houthi attacks have exposed critical weaknesses in the international response to Red Sea threats. The US-led naval coalition Operation Prosperity Guardian failed to meaningfully deter either attack or intervene during extended periods when vessels were under assault. Europe's defensive naval mission, Operation Aspides, proved equally ineffective. Israeli airstrikes following the Magic Seas attack were immediately followed by the even deadlier assault on the Eternity C, demonstrating that aerial bombardment alone cannot neutralize the Houthi maritime threat.\n\nThe failure of coalition forces to protect the Eternity C is particularly notable—the vessel was attacked while far from patrolling military ships, and rescue operations took over twenty-four hours to begin. This suggests either inadequate coverage of the vast maritime area requiring protection, insufficient intelligence on Houthi attack planning, or both. The Houthis' ability to conduct follow-up attacks on already-damaged vessels further indicates that coalition forces lack the persistent presence necessary to secure attacked ships and their crews.\n\nIf Western nations and Israel cannot effectively position themselves between Houthi forces and commercial shipping, the Red Sea may soon become effectively closed to international trade. The economic implications would be severe: the Suez Canal handles approximately 12% of global trade, and forcing that traffic around Africa would add roughly 3,500 nautical miles and 10-14 days to voyages between Asia and Europe. The resulting increases in shipping costs, insurance premiums, and delivery times would ripple through global supply chains, potentially contributing to inflation and shortages of goods worldwide.\n\nThe Houthis have demonstrated that they possess the technical capability, tactical sophistication, and strategic determination to sink commercial vessels despite the presence of advanced military forces in the region. Unless coalition operations undergo significant enhancement—whether through increased naval presence, improved intelligence gathering, or more effective coordination between assets—the threat to Red Sea shipping will likely continue to escalate.\n\n## Ukraine's Strategic Pivot to Africa\n\nWhile attention focuses on Eastern Europe, Ukraine has been quietly expanding its presence across Africa, opening a new front in its broader conflict with Russia. According to Maksym Subkh, Ukraine's top envoy to Africa, Kyiv is stepping up engagement with multiple African nations to build relationships, provide alternatives to Russian partnerships, and undermine critical elements of Russia's war effort.\n\nThe timing of Ukraine's African expansion is deliberate, targeting a moment when Russia's continental operations show significant vulnerabilities. Despite Kremlin claims of success, Russian mercenary forces have come under repeated attack across Africa, particularly in Mali, and have proven less effective than either they or their host nations hoped when battling insurgents. The Africa Corps, Russia's attempt to create a more controllable alternative to the Wagner Group, is arriving at lower combat readiness with none of the local connections or situational knowledge Wagner spent years developing. During these sensitive handover periods, Russian forces may be especially vulnerable as they acclimate to unfamiliar operational environments.\n\nUkraine has opened eight new embassies across Africa since Russia's 2022 invasion began, targeting nations that either have interests contrary to Russia's or have prior negative experiences with Moscow. The strategy focuses on countries that view Russia as simply another colonial power rather than a genuine partner. Ukrainian grain shipments have provided food aid to over eight million people across twelve vulnerable nations, according to the European Policy Center, creating goodwill and demonstrating an approach focused on humanitarian assistance rather than pure resource extraction.\n\n## Mauritania: Ukraine's Strategic Partnership Against Russian Interests\n\nUkraine has directed particular attention to Mauritania, a vast, sparsely populated desert nation of 4.3 million people that shares a border of over 2,000 kilometers with Mali, where Russian Africa Corps forces are completing their handover from Wagner Group operations. Mauritania represents an ideal partner for Ukraine's African strategy due to its complicated relationship with Mali and its Russian mercenary presence.\n\nMauritania is one of the poorest and most remote nations on Earth, where slavery still persists and nomadic desert herdsmen roam largely uninterrupted. Yet its extensive border with Mali provides strategic significance. Russian mercenaries in Mali are fighting not only jihadist insurgencies from Islamic State-Sahel and the al-Qaeda-linked group JNIM, but also Tuareg separatist groups. The Tuareg, a large historically nomadic ethnic population, organize into militant groups in Mali but are welcome in Mauritania's open badlands. Wagner forces have repeatedly violated Mauritanian sovereignty by pursuing Tuareg militants across the border, creating major diplomatic tensions.\n\nMauritania hosts nearly 250,000 Malian refugees fleeing both the asymmetric conflict and Mali's military government, and regards its neighbor as an unstable nation that risks allowing jihadist violence to spill across the border. Mali, meanwhile, accuses Mauritania of mistreating migrants and harboring loyalties to Western powers that Mali's regime has worked to expel. While the two nations are unlikely to engage in direct warfare—neither possesses the military capacity nor much worth fighting over—Mauritania's grievances against Russian client states make it an attractive partner for Ukraine.\n\nKyiv has already established direct collaboration with Mauritania, working to ferry food aid to refugee camps housing displaced Malians. Now Ukraine is pursuing a military partnership agreement to train Mauritanian soldiers and officers while offering technological partnerships to enhance the nation's fighting capacity. Mauritania's armed forces currently field approximately fifty post-World War II tanks, four propeller-driven combat aircraft, and a navy capable of deploying perhaps three small patrol craft. The nation is an ideal candidate to adopt the cheap, largely consumer-grade drone technology that Ukraine offers for surveillance, kamikaze attacks, and other applications—the same modern tools that have transformed warfare for small militaries and non-state actors globally.\n\n## Expanding Ukraine's African Footprint Beyond Mauritania\n\nMauritania represents just the beginning of Ukraine's African expansion strategy. Kyiv is providing to Mauritania what Russia provides to Mali—military training, technological partnerships, and security assistance—but with a fundamentally different approach that emphasizes humanitarian aid and avoids the atrocities and human rights abuses associated with Russian mercenary operations.\n\nUkraine has identified the Democratic Republic of the Congo as another potential defense partnership target. The DRC represents an attractive partner due to its willingness to counter Russian influence in sub-Saharan Africa at a moment when it faces threats from Rwanda-backed rebels and seeks to broaden economic collaboration with the United States. The DRC's vast mineral wealth and strategic position in central Africa make it a significant prize in the competition for African partnerships.\n\nThe nations Ukraine has targeted for embassy openings and potential partnerships share common characteristics: they either have interests running contrary to Russia's, or they have prior experiences with Moscow that led them to view Russia as no better than previous colonial powers. This targeting strategy allows Ukraine to position itself as a genuine alternative to Russian partnerships rather than simply another external power seeking to exploit African resources.\n\nUkraine's approach focuses minimally on resource extraction, at least currently, providing a welcome contrast to how Russia, China, and even the United States typically engage with African nations. By emphasizing humanitarian assistance, military training, and technology transfer rather than mineral rights and resource exploitation, Ukraine can offer partnerships that appear more equitable and less exploitative than alternatives. Ukrainian grain shipments providing food aid to millions across vulnerable nations reinforce this image of Ukraine as a partner interested in African welfare rather than pure extraction.\n\n## Opening a New Front Against Russia\n\nUkraine's African expansion serves dual purposes: building international partnerships that contrast favorably with Russian operations while creating military opportunities to directly engage Russian forces far from the primary Eastern European theater. By establishing presence in nations unfriendly to Russia—particularly those bordering Russian client states—Ukraine can begin taking the fight to Russia internationally, hampering the Russian war effort and forcing Moscow to divide attention and resources between its next-door neighbor and situations an entire continent away.\n\nThe placement of Ukrainian troops or paramilitary units in Africa would allow direct action against Russian mercenary forces in environments where Russia may be overextended and vulnerable. Russian forces in Mali and other African nations are already under pressure from local insurgencies and struggling with the transition from Wagner Group to Africa Corps operations. Ukrainian forces operating from neighboring countries could provide intelligence, training, and potentially direct support to groups opposing Russian presence, multiplying the challenges Moscow faces in maintaining its African foothold.\n\nThis strategy forces Russia into a difficult position: Moscow must either commit additional resources to defend its African operations, drawing forces and attention away from Ukraine, or accept degradation of its African presence and the loss of resources those operations provide. Either outcome benefits Ukraine's broader strategic position. The resources Russia extracts from African operations—minerals, revenue from protection services, and geopolitical influence—all support its war effort in Ukraine. Disrupting these operations therefore directly impacts Russia's capacity to sustain its invasion.\n\nUkraine's African strategy also provides international diplomatic benefits. By positioning itself as a responsible partner offering humanitarian assistance and reasonable military cooperation, Ukraine can build support among African nations at the United Nations and other international forums. Many African nations have remained neutral or even tacitly supportive of Russia during the Ukraine conflict, partly due to historical relationships and partly due to Russian presence and influence on the continent. Ukrainian partnerships offering genuine alternatives to Russian engagement could shift these diplomatic alignments, further isolating Moscow internationally while building Ukraine's coalition of supporters.\n\n## Togo's Constitutional Crisis: Youth Protests Meet Deadly Crackdown\n\nWhile global attention has focused on Red Sea shipping attacks and Ukraine's strategic maneuvers, another crisis has unfolded largely unnoticed in West Africa. Togo, a small nation wedged between Ghana and Benin, has experienced deadly youth-led protests against controversial constitutional reforms, resulting in a violent government crackdown that has killed multiple demonstrators and triggered internet restrictions across the country.\n\nThe protests center on constitutional changes that critics argue are designed to entrench the ruling Gnassingbé family's decades-long grip on power. The reforms have sparked outrage among Togolese youth who view them as the latest in a series of maneuvers to subvert democratic processes and prevent genuine political competition. When protesters took to the streets to voice their opposition, security forces responded with lethal force, firing live ammunition and tear gas into crowds and pursuing demonstrators even into private homes.\n\nAmong the victims was Jacques Koami Koutoglo, a fifteen-year-old who had just completed secondary school and dreamed of becoming a footballer. He spent his evenings practicing his moves and helped at his uncle's cafeteria during school breaks. On the morning of June 26, he vanished after hearing gunshots and tear gas fired by security forces. His family found his body in a lagoon a hundred meters from his home. According to eyewitnesses, security forces had chased down youths throughout the neighborhood, entering private courtyards and beating residents. \"They came into our courtyard. They fired gas. They beat people,\" a neighbor recounted. Koutoglo's name has joined a growing list of young lives cut short during moments of national tension in Togo.\n\n## Government Blames Diaspora, Restricts Internet Access\n\nThe Togolese government has characterized the protests as inorganic, claiming they were fueled not by genuine domestic grievances but by the Togolese diaspora operating from abroad. In a strongly worded statement, the government accused influencers in the diaspora of using social media to spread disinformation, incitement to hatred, violence, incivility, and civil disobedience.\n\nThis accusation provided the government with a pretext to clamp down on internet access and social media platforms. According to NetBlocks, a digital rights organization that monitors and reports on internet access, social platforms TikTok, Facebook, and Telegram were restricted on the country's main internet provider, Togocom. Internet access in Togo remained limited as of 1 a.m. local time on July 9th, effectively silencing protesters' ability to organize and communicate their message to the outside world.\n\nThe government's response follows a familiar authoritarian playbook: when faced with domestic unrest, blame external agitators and cut off the digital infrastructure that enables coordination and documentation of state violence. By restricting social media access, the Togolese government has made it significantly more difficult for protesters to share evidence of the crackdown, organize future demonstrations, or build international solidarity for their cause.\n\n## International Silence: Why the World Isn't Watching Togo\n\nThe deadly crackdown in Togo has received remarkably little international attention, particularly when compared to other recent youth-led protests in Africa. Kenya's protests, which also turned deadly, triggered significant international reaction and media coverage. Yet the Togolese crisis has been met with near-total silence from the international community, including organizations typically expected to respond to such situations.\n\nECOWAS, the West African regional bloc that includes Togo, expressed \"deep concern\" and called for restraint—diplomatic language that essentially translates to \"we don't want to get involved.\" The African Union has remained entirely silent on the matter, as has the United States government. This conspicuous lack of response raises questions about why Togo's crisis has failed to generate the international pressure that might constrain the government's violent response.\n\nThe silence may be strategic. Togo currently serves as the African Union's mediator and played a key role in the recent U.S.-brokered peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo following an outbreak of violence in eastern DRC. When Kigali and Kinshasa signed the agreement in Washington, Robert Dussey, the Togolese foreign minister, was in attendance. His presence underscored Togo's growing diplomatic importance in regional conflict resolution, which may explain why the international community has been reluctant to criticize the government's handling of domestic protests.\n\nFabien Offner, a researcher for Amnesty International, offered an alternative explanation for the international silence. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he claimed that Togo had become a \"diplomatic blindspot\"—essentially a country so small and seemingly insignificant that the international community lacks any incentive to intervene in its internal affairs. Despite this assessment, Offner urged the international community to act: \"We need stronger, more vocal engagement from the African Union, ECOWAS, the United Nations, and key bilateral partners. Their silence emboldens the cycle of repression. They must speak out and act.\"\n\nThe reality, however, is that the world appears unlikely to listen. Togo lacks the strategic resources, geographic importance, or international profile that might compel major powers to pressure its government. With no external intervention forthcoming and the government firmly entrenched, the Togolese people are left to wonder what options remain available to them.\n\n## The Illusion of Democratic Alternatives\n\nGovernment officials have suggested that protesters should pursue their grievances through democratic channels rather than taking to the streets. Gilbert Bawara, the minister of public service, argued in a statement to Al Jazeera that \"If anyone disagrees, they can petition, they can participate in elections. These are the foundations of a democratic society.\"\n\nCritics, however, argue that such avenues are largely symbolic under the current government. With the ruling UNIR party dominating institutions, controlling security forces, and systematically sidelining opposition figures through arrests, exile, and cooptation, many view the political playing field as fundamentally rigged. The very constitutional reforms that sparked the protests are seen as further evidence that the government manipulates democratic processes to maintain power rather than genuinely competing for it.\n\nPaul Amegakpo, founder of the Tamberma Institute for Governance, told Al Jazeera: \"There are democratic forms, yes, but they are hollow. The rules may exist on paper – elections, assemblies, petitions – but power in Togo is not contested on equal footing. It is captured and preserved through coercion, clientelism and constitutional engineering.\"\n\nAmegakpo's assessment reflects the broader sentiment among the Togolese public, who believe that street protests represent the only tool capable of bringing the government to the negotiating table. When formal democratic channels are controlled by the very power structure being challenged, direct action becomes the only meaningful form of political expression available to citizens. This dynamic creates a dangerous cycle: the government refuses to engage with protests it deems illegitimate, while protesters see no alternative to demonstrations that the government violently suppresses.\n\n## The Cycle Continues: More Protests Planned Despite Deadly Response\n\nDespite the violent crackdown and the deaths of protesters like Jacques Koami Koutoglo, activists are planning subsequent protests for July 15th and 16th. They have also called for the postponement of municipal elections slated for July 17th, arguing that the current political climate and lack of consensus do not favor a free and fair electoral process.\n\nThe decision to continue protesting in the face of lethal state violence demonstrates both the depth of popular frustration with the government and the absence of viable alternatives for political expression. Protesters understand the risks—they have seen their peers killed, beaten, and pursued into their homes by security forces—yet they continue to organize because they perceive the constitutional reforms as an existential threat to any possibility of future democratic governance in Togo.\n\nTogo appears destined for another wave of potentially deadly protests. The regime has no incentive to change its approach, having faced no meaningful international pressure for its violent response to the initial demonstrations. No outside power seems interested in intervening to protect protesters or pressure the government toward dialogue. And the citizens continue to feel fundamentally disenfranchised, viewing street protests as their only remaining tool for political participation.\n\nCaught in the middle of this cycle are young people like Koutoglo, whose lives are cut short during moments of national tension. As things currently stand, more names appear set to join the list of those killed while demanding democratic accountability from their government. Tragically, their sacrifice may prove to be in vain—without international pressure or a shift in the government's calculus, the protests are unlikely to achieve their objectives, and the constitutional reforms they oppose will likely be implemented regardless of the human cost of resistance.\n\n## Related Coverage\n- [The UAE is Destabilizing the Entire Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/conflicts/the-uae-is-destabilizing-the-entire-middle-east)\n- [How the UAE's Regional Meddling Triggered a Historic Realignment Across the Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-destabilizing-middle-east-regional-realignment-2026)\n- [The UAE's Regional Ambitions Collapse as Middle East Powers Push Back](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-regional-ambitions-collapse-middle-east-pushback)\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n### What tactics did the Houthis use to sink the Magic Seas and Eternity C?\n\nThe Houthis deployed sophisticated coordinated assaults combining manned speedboats carrying fighters with rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, unmanned surface vessels (drone boats laden with explosives), aerial drones, and missiles. Against the Magic Seas they committed eight manned boats and four drone boats, then boarded the stricken vessel, planted explosives, and deliberately sank it. The Eternity C was attacked with four speedboats and aerial drones that struck the ship's deck, bridge, and lifeboats.\n\n### How did the July 2025 attacks compare to the Houthis' previous Red Sea campaign?\n\nDuring their entire campaign from late 2023 through the end of 2024, the Houthis had sunk only two ships and killed four crew members total. In just two days in July 2025, they sank two more vessels and killed at least four crew members on the Eternity C alone, matching their previous totals and signaling a fundamental escalation in both lethality and operational commitment.\n\n### What is the reported alliance between the Houthis and al-Shabaab, and why does it matter?\n\nReports indicate the Houthis are supplying al-Shabaab with weapons including drones and possibly guided missiles, while al-Shabaab provides piracy network diversions that draw coalition naval patrols away from Houthi smuggling routes. Al-Shabaab may also be providing targeting data: a full third of Houthi attacks in the Gulf of Aden have struck ships that should have been beyond Houthi radar range. If the two groups coordinate attacks jointly, the entire lower Red Sea and Gulf of Aden could fall within their combined operational range, potentially forcing all commercial traffic to reroute around Africa.\n\n### Why is Ukraine targeting Mauritania as a strategic partner in Africa?\n\nMauritania shares more than 2,000 kilometers of border with Mali, where Russia's Africa Corps is completing its handover from Wagner Group operations. Russian mercenaries have repeatedly violated Mauritanian sovereignty by pursuing Tuareg militants across the border, creating serious diplomatic tensions. Ukraine is pursuing a military partnership to train Mauritanian soldiers and offer consumer-grade drone technology, positioning itself as a counterweight to Russian influence directly on the border of a Russian client state.\n\n### How does Ukraine's African strategy threaten Russia's war effort?\n\nBy establishing embassies and military partnerships in nations unfriendly to Russia — particularly those bordering Russian client states — Ukraine can provide intelligence, training, and potentially direct support to groups opposing Russian mercenary forces in places like Mali. Russia extracts minerals, protection-service revenue, and geopolitical influence from its African operations, all of which support its invasion of Ukraine. Disrupting those operations either forces Moscow to divert resources from Ukraine to defend Africa, or accept degradation of its African presence and the loss of those supporting resources.\n\n## Sources\n- <https://www.ft.com/content/e08ab9e5-99be-449b-abe6-e65e5d18cf55>\n- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ship-risk-sinking-after-first-houthi-red-sea-attack-this-year-2025-07-07/>\n- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce9xdlxp1x7o>\n- <https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/israel-yemen-houthis-airstrikes-red-sea-missile-shipping-rcna217172>\n- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-15edf75586540201f63b7c33348fb737>\n- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/crew-greek-ship-hit-off-yemen-safe-vessel-risks-sinking-operator-says-2025-07-07/>\n- <https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/crew-abandons-ship-attacked-red-sea-uk-military-123519387>\n- <https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20250706-israel-yemen-houthi>\n- <https://www.twz.com/news-features/houthis-launch-first-red-sea-attack-on-shipping-since-december>\n- <https://maritime-executive.com/article/houthis-claim-bulker-sank-after-yesterday-s-attack-in-the-red-sea>\n- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-6dc55ee05a9d1e78621788aa0bc52168?utm_source=dailybrief&utm_content=20250708&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyBrief2025july8&utm_term=DailyNewsBrief>\n- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/9/five-rescued-after-suspected-attack-by-yemens-houthis-on-red-sea-vessel>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/09/rescuers-search-for-crew-of-cargo-ship-eternity-c-that-sank-after-being-attacked-in-red-sea>\n- <https://apnews.com/video/yemens-houthi-rebels-release-video-of-their-deadly-attack-on-cargo-ship-in-red-sea-d59ebfa86f4d4a0d929c1b65bcfac6b1>\n- <https://www.euronews.com/2025/07/09/rescuers-search-for-survivors-after-three-sailors-killed-in-houthi-attack-in-red-sea>\n- <https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/08/world/middleeast/red-sea-ship-attack.html>\n- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-6dc55ee05a9d1e78621788aa0bc52168>\n- <https://www.ft.com/content/503b9f75-f3a0-40b1-bc64-a9f2ffd7376f>\n- <https://newlinesmag.com/spotlight/a-pact-between-al-shabab-and-the-houthis-threatens-red-sea-shipping/>\n- <https://www.btl-research.com/p/the-houthis-and-al-shabaab-mounting?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1709097&post_id=166831745&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1if49o&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email>\n- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/africa-shoestring-ukraine-seeks-allies-with-aid-embassies-2025-06-25/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=Weekend-Briefing&utm_term=062825&lctg=6422d13ff77d798afe06361d>\n- <https://www.theafricareport.com/386539/youll-get-the-bill-soon-ukraine-warns-africa-over-russias-embrace/>\n- <https://ecfr.eu/article/the-other-counter-offensive-ukraines-diplomatic-push-in-africa/>\n- <https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/lifestyle/ukraine-counters-russias-africa-influence-with-military-training-offer-in-west-africa/5zrgqy4>\n- <https://adf-magazine.com/2024/05/mali-wagner-incursions-into-mauritania-spark-tension/>\n- <https://www.voaafrica.com/a/mauritanian-defense-minister-arrives-in-mali-to-ease-tensions/7578776.html>\n- <https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/africasource/mauritania-should-mediate-in-mali-heres-how/>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/06/ukrainian-special-forces-sudan-russian-mercenaries-wagner>\n- <https://www.wsj.com/world/ukraine-is-now-fighting-russia-in-sudan-87caf1d8?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAi1lJUpbVjv0XgfUaCSLWUouLlK7Xf87CHdJ5TgmmFalvuuj6feDKG8TvJCEAk%3D&gaa_ts=68642314&gaa_sig=_9dgqn56pSWNdlMpFwvtDgG2dNWwhgviw9QSRCnChsZK9ZJFTu-FGSAdnLwVYp5OAb2RBtSpekZ00K5MgwQ7ow%3D%3D>\n- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg9eked5vgo>\n- <https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-08-28/ukraines-alleged-support-for-tuareg-rebels-fighting-wagner-mercenaries-further-poisons-sahel-conflict.html>\n- <https://civil.ge/archives/663473>\n- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0jwnykl10o>\n- <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64495403>\n- <https://youtu.be/KsQTIceriwk?si=DkZP7AAyvX-2cnul&t=162>\n- <https://meduza.io/en/feature/2025/06/06/georgia-s-democratic-reckoning>\n- <https://www.facebook.com/reel/980480050215675>\n- <https://oc-media.org/eu-parliament-calls-for-sanctions-against-ivanishvili-and-others-and-non-recognition-of-georgian-dream-government/>\n- <https://formulanews.ge/News/114836>\n- <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20250204IPR26689/meps-georgia-s-self-proclaimed-authorities-have-no-legitimacy>\n- <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20241121IPR25549/parliament-calls-for-new-elections-in-georgia>\n- <https://www.politico.eu/article/romania-election-loser-far-right-george-simion-challenges-results-court/>\n- <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CTrkN6aQDU&t=1523s>\n- <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/05/georgia-women-protesters-are-targeted-with-escalating-violence-and-gender-based-reprisals/?utm_source=chatgpt.com>\n- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/4/togo-protests-signal-youth-anger-at-dynastic-rule-but-is-change-possible>\n- <https://www.dw.com/en/togo-rights-groups-report-several-killed-in-demonstrations/a-73111065>\n- <https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/togo-protests-gnassingbe/?nsl_bypass_cache=52a7f52acc4988b884d36304d3b9c0d3>\n- <https://www.amnesty.nl/actueel/togo-testimonies-provide-glimpse-into-violent-repression-of-protests>\n- <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/06/togo-protesters-tortured/>\n- <https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/west-africa/togo-soldiers-break-up-protests-against-longtime-leader-5096628>\n\n<!-- youtube:_HBqKGnPY34 -->"
url: https://warfronts.pub/article/houthi-rebels-sink-ships-red-sea-ukraine-africa-operations.md
canonical: https://warfronts.pub/article/houthi-rebels-sink-ships-red-sea-ukraine-africa-operations
datePublished: 2026-02-17
dateModified: 2026-02-17
author:
  - name: Simon Whistler
    url: https://warfronts.pub/author/simon-whistler
publisher: Warfronts
image: "https://media.warfronts.pub/cdn-cgi/image/width=1600,height=900,fit=cover,quality=80,format=auto/articles/_HBqKGnPY34/hero.jpg"
type: NewsArticle
contentHash: 845557a0cdd8cfdd12072fcd9f8e1adda4fa8b4b4bdd7a5e9dd46f11c0801c22
tokens: 10556
summaryUrl: https://warfronts.pub/article/houthi-rebels-sink-ships-red-sea-ukraine-africa-operations.md.summary.md
---

<!-- aeo:section start="lede" -->
In a dramatic escalation of Red Sea violence, Yemen's Houthi rebels have sunk two commercial vessels in sophisticated coordinated attacks, killing multiple crew members and demonstrating enhanced military capabilities despite sustained bombardment from Israel and US-led coalition forces. The attacks on the Magic Seas and Eternity C represent a significant shift in both the technical sophistication and lethal intent of Houthi operations, threatening to disrupt one of the world's most critical shipping lanes. Meanwhile, Ukraine is expanding its presence across Africa, establishing new embassies and military partnerships in nations bordering Russian client states, opening a new front in its broader conflict with Moscow by targeting Russia's mercenary operations on the continent.

<!-- aeo:section end="lede" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="key-takeaways" -->
## Key Takeaways

- Yemen's Houthi rebels sank two commercial vessels (Magic Seas and Eternity C) in sophisticated coordinated attacks using manned speedboats, unmanned surface vessels, aerial drones, and missiles, killing multiple crew members in July 2025.
- The attacks represent a significant escalation in Houthi capabilities and lethality, matching the total number of ships sunk and crew killed during their entire 2023-2024 campaign in just 48 hours.
- Reports indicate the Houthis have formed an alliance with Somali terror group al-Shabaab, potentially expanding their operational range across the Gulf of Aden and threatening to close the Red Sea to commercial traffic entirely.
- Ukraine is expanding its presence across Africa by opening eight new embassies and establishing military partnerships with nations like Mauritania that border Russian client states, offering drone technology and military training as alternatives to Russian mercenary operations.
- Ukraine's African strategy aims to open a new front against Russia by targeting Russian mercenary forces and resource extraction operations that support Moscow's war effort, while providing humanitarian assistance that contrasts with Russian operations.

<!-- aeo:section end="key-takeaways" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-magic-seas-attack-a-new-level-of-houthi-coordination" -->
## The Magic Seas Attack: A New Level of Houthi Coordination

On July 6th, the bulk carrier Magic Seas came under attack approximately fifty nautical miles southeast of the Yemeni port city of Hodeidah. The vessel, owned by a Greek shipping company and flying the Liberian flag, was sailing northbound toward the Saudi coast and Suez Canal carrying iron and fertilizer when Houthi forces launched their assault.

The attack unfolded in multiple waves, demonstrating unprecedented coordination and resource commitment from the Houthis. Initially, eight manned small boats approached the vessel, with fighters aboard carrying rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. These fighters fired on the Magic Seas but notably declined to board before departing. This initial assault was followed by a second wave consisting of four unmanned surface vessels—drone boats laden with explosives and coordinated remotely from shore.

These sea drones represent a particularly dangerous threat to both civilian and military vessels. They are extremely difficult to detect during approach and are designed to detonate at or below the waterline, virtually guaranteeing catastrophic hull breaches if they reach their target. An armed security team aboard the Magic Seas managed to destroy two of the incoming drone boats, but the remaining two struck the vessel successfully. With the ship taking on water, the crew was forced to evacuate and was eventually rescued by a passing vessel.

According to Houthi rebel statements, the assault continued even after evacuation. The organization claimed to have attacked the abandoned vessel with missiles and aerial drones, then boarded it, planted explosives, and deliberately sunk it. Video footage appearing to validate these claims had emerged by the time of reporting. The commitment of eight manned boats, four unmanned surface vessels, missiles, and aerial drones to a single target represents an extraordinary allocation of resources for the Houthis, signaling what Martin Kelly, head of marine security company EOS Risk Group, characterized to the Financial Times as clear intent: "They meant to sink this ship."

<!-- aeo:section end="the-magic-seas-attack-a-new-level-of-houthi-coordination" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="israeli-retaliation-and-houthi-counter-strikes" -->
## Israeli Retaliation and Houthi Counter-Strikes

Israel responded swiftly to the Magic Seas attack with airstrikes across three Yemeni port cities: Hodeidah, al-Salif, and Ras Isa. All three locations serve as centers of Houthi power and facilitate the trade and weapons smuggling operations that sustain the organization financially and militarily. Israeli forces also targeted a power station and the Galaxy Leader, a car-carrier trade ship that the Houthis had seized in late 2023 and converted into a propaganda showcase. Israel alleged that the captured vessel had been fitted with radar systems to help identify other commercial ships for targeting.

The Houthis claimed to have forced Israeli warplanes to retreat by launching anti-aircraft missiles, though the extent of Israel's successful strikes suggests these claims were exaggerated and that Israeli combat jets completed their missions largely unimpeded. Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree announced retaliatory launches of missiles and drones targeting Israel's Ben Gurion Airport, two ports, and a power station, though Israel reported no successful strikes from these counter-attacks.

The exchange highlighted a familiar pattern in the ongoing conflict: Israel possesses overwhelming air superiority and can strike Houthi targets with relative impunity, while Houthi long-range capabilities against Israeli territory remain largely ineffective. However, the Houthis' ability to continue operations against maritime targets despite sustained aerial bombardment demonstrates the limitations of airpower alone in neutralizing their threat to Red Sea shipping.

<!-- aeo:section end="israeli-retaliation-and-houthi-counter-strikes" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-eternity-c-a-deadlier-second-attack" -->
## The Eternity C: A Deadlier Second Attack

Just one day after the Magic Seas incident, a second bulk carrier came under Houthi attack in a location near the first strike. The Eternity C, also Greek-owned and Liberian-flagged, was heading northward toward the Suez Canal when Houthi forces launched their assault. The attack followed a similar pattern but with critical differences in execution and outcome.

Four manned speedboats attacked the vessel simultaneously, striking it with rocket-propelled grenade and rifle fire. Several aerial drones then attacked from above, hitting the ship's deck rather than the waterline. Despite not breaching the hull below the waterline, the attack proved far more lethal to the crew than the previous day's assault. At least four crew members were killed and two others seriously injured in the strike. The ship's bridge sustained heavy damage, as did its lifeboats and telecommunications equipment, severely complicating evacuation efforts.

The Eternity C was attacked while far from military vessels patrolling the Red Sea as part of coalition operations, and rescue operations took over twenty-four hours to begin identifying survivors. Compounding the tragedy, the Houthis attacked the ship again after initial damage had been sustained, further endangering survivors and rescue efforts. At the time of reporting, only four crew members and one armed guard had been rescued after drifting in the water for over a day. The fate of other survivors remained unknown, with concerns that some may have still been aboard the vessel or potentially taken hostage during a Houthi boarding operation.

Some sources reported the ship had sunk by the time of writing, though definitive confirmation was pending. The attack on the Eternity C marked a significant escalation in lethality—in just two days, the Houthis had matched the total number of ships sunk and crew members killed during their entire previous campaign from late 2023 through the end of 2024.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-eternity-c-a-deadlier-second-attack" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="a-fundamental-shift-in-houthi-tactics-and-intent" -->
## A Fundamental Shift in Houthi Tactics and Intent

The attacks on the Magic Seas and Eternity C represent more than isolated incidents—they signal a fundamental transformation in Houthi capabilities and strategic approach to Red Sea operations. Since beginning their campaign against international shipping in late 2023, the Houthis had previously sunk only two ships, captured one vessel, and killed four crew members total. The July 2025 attacks doubled the number of sunken vessels and significantly increased crew fatalities in just forty-eight hours.

The technical sophistication displayed in these operations demonstrates that the Houthis have mastered complex, multi-faceted attacks despite sustained bombardment from both Israeli forces and the US-led Operation Prosperity Guardian coalition. The coordination of manned speedboats, unmanned surface vessels, aerial drones, and missiles against single targets, followed by boarding operations and deliberate scuttling, represents a level of operational planning and resource commitment previously unseen in Houthi maritime operations.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent shift in targeting criteria. The Houthis have consistently claimed their attacks target only Israel and organizations with ties to the country. However, neither the Magic Seas nor the Eternity C had current Israeli connections, though at least one vessel had previously called at Israeli ports. This confirms long-held suspicions that Houthi targeting data may be outdated, fabricated to provide political cover, or that the organization has abandoned any pretense of selective targeting in favor of attacking vessels indiscriminately.

The attacks have already triggered market responses, with insurance premiums spiking in ways that will deter commercial vessels from transiting the Red Sea. This matters enormously because Houthi-controlled territory sits along one of the world's most critical trade waterways. Ships avoiding the Red Sea cannot access the Suez Canal, forcing them to circumnavigate Africa—a route that adds significant time and cost while creating downstream supply chain disruptions globally. Insurance premiums had previously spiked during the Houthis' 2023-2024 campaign, but the demonstrated lethality and determination of these new attacks threatens to close the Red Sea to commercial traffic entirely if just one or two more similar incidents occur.

<!-- aeo:section end="a-fundamental-shift-in-houthi-tactics-and-intent" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-houthi-al-shabaab-alliance-expanding-the-threat" -->
## The Houthi-Al-Shabaab Alliance: Expanding the Threat

Recent reporting from multiple outlets has drawn attention to a developing alliance between the Houthis and al-Shabaab, the Somali terror group currently engaged in a complex offensive against Somalia's federal government. This partnership, operating from opposite shores of one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, introduces an additional layer of threat to maritime security in the region.

According to these reports, the Houthis have begun supplying al-Shabaab with weapons extending beyond small arms to include drones and possibly guided missiles. In exchange, al-Shabaab provides support through its piracy networks, creating diversions and attracting coalition naval patrols away from areas where Houthi smugglers are attempting to reach Yemen's ports with weapons and supplies.

The alliance appears to have already produced tangible results. Al-Shabaab has reportedly received sniper rifles and light machine guns from Houthi sources, and both organizations have integrated themselves into larger supply chains running from the Middle East to the East African coast. According to United Nations assessments, al-Shabaab may be providing targeting data to the Houthis—a full one-third of Houthi attacks in the Gulf of Aden have targeted ships that should have been beyond the range of Houthi radar systems, suggesting external intelligence support. Al-Shabaab fighters have also been discovered smuggling kamikaze drones that appear to be of Houthi origin.

If the two groups coordinate attacks rather than merely sharing resources and intelligence, the entire lower Red Sea and much of the Gulf of Aden could fall within their combined operational range. This would eliminate the option for commercial vessels to simply hug the African coastline to stay beyond Houthi range, potentially forcing a complete rerouting of maritime traffic around the African continent with catastrophic implications for global supply chains and shipping costs.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-houthi-al-shabaab-alliance-expanding-the-threat" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="coalition-response-failures-and-future-implications" -->
## Coalition Response Failures and Future Implications

The recent Houthi attacks have exposed critical weaknesses in the international response to Red Sea threats. The US-led naval coalition Operation Prosperity Guardian failed to meaningfully deter either attack or intervene during extended periods when vessels were under assault. Europe's defensive naval mission, Operation Aspides, proved equally ineffective. Israeli airstrikes following the Magic Seas attack were immediately followed by the even deadlier assault on the Eternity C, demonstrating that aerial bombardment alone cannot neutralize the Houthi maritime threat.

The failure of coalition forces to protect the Eternity C is particularly notable—the vessel was attacked while far from patrolling military ships, and rescue operations took over twenty-four hours to begin. This suggests either inadequate coverage of the vast maritime area requiring protection, insufficient intelligence on Houthi attack planning, or both. The Houthis' ability to conduct follow-up attacks on already-damaged vessels further indicates that coalition forces lack the persistent presence necessary to secure attacked ships and their crews.

If Western nations and Israel cannot effectively position themselves between Houthi forces and commercial shipping, the Red Sea may soon become effectively closed to international trade. The economic implications would be severe: the Suez Canal handles approximately 12% of global trade, and forcing that traffic around Africa would add roughly 3,500 nautical miles and 10-14 days to voyages between Asia and Europe. The resulting increases in shipping costs, insurance premiums, and delivery times would ripple through global supply chains, potentially contributing to inflation and shortages of goods worldwide.

The Houthis have demonstrated that they possess the technical capability, tactical sophistication, and strategic determination to sink commercial vessels despite the presence of advanced military forces in the region. Unless coalition operations undergo significant enhancement—whether through increased naval presence, improved intelligence gathering, or more effective coordination between assets—the threat to Red Sea shipping will likely continue to escalate.

<!-- aeo:section end="coalition-response-failures-and-future-implications" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="ukraine-s-strategic-pivot-to-africa" -->
## Ukraine's Strategic Pivot to Africa

While attention focuses on Eastern Europe, Ukraine has been quietly expanding its presence across Africa, opening a new front in its broader conflict with Russia. According to Maksym Subkh, Ukraine's top envoy to Africa, Kyiv is stepping up engagement with multiple African nations to build relationships, provide alternatives to Russian partnerships, and undermine critical elements of Russia's war effort.

The timing of Ukraine's African expansion is deliberate, targeting a moment when Russia's continental operations show significant vulnerabilities. Despite Kremlin claims of success, Russian mercenary forces have come under repeated attack across Africa, particularly in Mali, and have proven less effective than either they or their host nations hoped when battling insurgents. The Africa Corps, Russia's attempt to create a more controllable alternative to the Wagner Group, is arriving at lower combat readiness with none of the local connections or situational knowledge Wagner spent years developing. During these sensitive handover periods, Russian forces may be especially vulnerable as they acclimate to unfamiliar operational environments.

Ukraine has opened eight new embassies across Africa since Russia's 2022 invasion began, targeting nations that either have interests contrary to Russia's or have prior negative experiences with Moscow. The strategy focuses on countries that view Russia as simply another colonial power rather than a genuine partner. Ukrainian grain shipments have provided food aid to over eight million people across twelve vulnerable nations, according to the European Policy Center, creating goodwill and demonstrating an approach focused on humanitarian assistance rather than pure resource extraction.

<!-- aeo:section end="ukraine-s-strategic-pivot-to-africa" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="mauritania-ukraine-s-strategic-partnership-against-russian-inter" -->
## Mauritania: Ukraine's Strategic Partnership Against Russian Interests

Ukraine has directed particular attention to Mauritania, a vast, sparsely populated desert nation of 4.3 million people that shares a border of over 2,000 kilometers with Mali, where Russian Africa Corps forces are completing their handover from Wagner Group operations. Mauritania represents an ideal partner for Ukraine's African strategy due to its complicated relationship with Mali and its Russian mercenary presence.

Mauritania is one of the poorest and most remote nations on Earth, where slavery still persists and nomadic desert herdsmen roam largely uninterrupted. Yet its extensive border with Mali provides strategic significance. Russian mercenaries in Mali are fighting not only jihadist insurgencies from Islamic State-Sahel and the al-Qaeda-linked group JNIM, but also Tuareg separatist groups. The Tuareg, a large historically nomadic ethnic population, organize into militant groups in Mali but are welcome in Mauritania's open badlands. Wagner forces have repeatedly violated Mauritanian sovereignty by pursuing Tuareg militants across the border, creating major diplomatic tensions.

Mauritania hosts nearly 250,000 Malian refugees fleeing both the asymmetric conflict and Mali's military government, and regards its neighbor as an unstable nation that risks allowing jihadist violence to spill across the border. Mali, meanwhile, accuses Mauritania of mistreating migrants and harboring loyalties to Western powers that Mali's regime has worked to expel. While the two nations are unlikely to engage in direct warfare—neither possesses the military capacity nor much worth fighting over—Mauritania's grievances against Russian client states make it an attractive partner for Ukraine.

Kyiv has already established direct collaboration with Mauritania, working to ferry food aid to refugee camps housing displaced Malians. Now Ukraine is pursuing a military partnership agreement to train Mauritanian soldiers and officers while offering technological partnerships to enhance the nation's fighting capacity. Mauritania's armed forces currently field approximately fifty post-World War II tanks, four propeller-driven combat aircraft, and a navy capable of deploying perhaps three small patrol craft. The nation is an ideal candidate to adopt the cheap, largely consumer-grade drone technology that Ukraine offers for surveillance, kamikaze attacks, and other applications—the same modern tools that have transformed warfare for small militaries and non-state actors globally.

<!-- aeo:section end="mauritania-ukraine-s-strategic-partnership-against-russian-inter" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="expanding-ukraine-s-african-footprint-beyond-mauritania" -->
## Expanding Ukraine's African Footprint Beyond Mauritania

Mauritania represents just the beginning of Ukraine's African expansion strategy. Kyiv is providing to Mauritania what Russia provides to Mali—military training, technological partnerships, and security assistance—but with a fundamentally different approach that emphasizes humanitarian aid and avoids the atrocities and human rights abuses associated with Russian mercenary operations.

Ukraine has identified the Democratic Republic of the Congo as another potential defense partnership target. The DRC represents an attractive partner due to its willingness to counter Russian influence in sub-Saharan Africa at a moment when it faces threats from Rwanda-backed rebels and seeks to broaden economic collaboration with the United States. The DRC's vast mineral wealth and strategic position in central Africa make it a significant prize in the competition for African partnerships.

The nations Ukraine has targeted for embassy openings and potential partnerships share common characteristics: they either have interests running contrary to Russia's, or they have prior experiences with Moscow that led them to view Russia as no better than previous colonial powers. This targeting strategy allows Ukraine to position itself as a genuine alternative to Russian partnerships rather than simply another external power seeking to exploit African resources.

Ukraine's approach focuses minimally on resource extraction, at least currently, providing a welcome contrast to how Russia, China, and even the United States typically engage with African nations. By emphasizing humanitarian assistance, military training, and technology transfer rather than mineral rights and resource exploitation, Ukraine can offer partnerships that appear more equitable and less exploitative than alternatives. Ukrainian grain shipments providing food aid to millions across vulnerable nations reinforce this image of Ukraine as a partner interested in African welfare rather than pure extraction.

<!-- aeo:section end="expanding-ukraine-s-african-footprint-beyond-mauritania" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="opening-a-new-front-against-russia" -->
## Opening a New Front Against Russia

Ukraine's African expansion serves dual purposes: building international partnerships that contrast favorably with Russian operations while creating military opportunities to directly engage Russian forces far from the primary Eastern European theater. By establishing presence in nations unfriendly to Russia—particularly those bordering Russian client states—Ukraine can begin taking the fight to Russia internationally, hampering the Russian war effort and forcing Moscow to divide attention and resources between its next-door neighbor and situations an entire continent away.

The placement of Ukrainian troops or paramilitary units in Africa would allow direct action against Russian mercenary forces in environments where Russia may be overextended and vulnerable. Russian forces in Mali and other African nations are already under pressure from local insurgencies and struggling with the transition from Wagner Group to Africa Corps operations. Ukrainian forces operating from neighboring countries could provide intelligence, training, and potentially direct support to groups opposing Russian presence, multiplying the challenges Moscow faces in maintaining its African foothold.

This strategy forces Russia into a difficult position: Moscow must either commit additional resources to defend its African operations, drawing forces and attention away from Ukraine, or accept degradation of its African presence and the loss of resources those operations provide. Either outcome benefits Ukraine's broader strategic position. The resources Russia extracts from African operations—minerals, revenue from protection services, and geopolitical influence—all support its war effort in Ukraine. Disrupting these operations therefore directly impacts Russia's capacity to sustain its invasion.

Ukraine's African strategy also provides international diplomatic benefits. By positioning itself as a responsible partner offering humanitarian assistance and reasonable military cooperation, Ukraine can build support among African nations at the United Nations and other international forums. Many African nations have remained neutral or even tacitly supportive of Russia during the Ukraine conflict, partly due to historical relationships and partly due to Russian presence and influence on the continent. Ukrainian partnerships offering genuine alternatives to Russian engagement could shift these diplomatic alignments, further isolating Moscow internationally while building Ukraine's coalition of supporters.

<!-- aeo:section end="opening-a-new-front-against-russia" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="togo-s-constitutional-crisis-youth-protests-meet-deadly-crackdow" -->
## Togo's Constitutional Crisis: Youth Protests Meet Deadly Crackdown

While global attention has focused on Red Sea shipping attacks and Ukraine's strategic maneuvers, another crisis has unfolded largely unnoticed in West Africa. Togo, a small nation wedged between Ghana and Benin, has experienced deadly youth-led protests against controversial constitutional reforms, resulting in a violent government crackdown that has killed multiple demonstrators and triggered internet restrictions across the country.

The protests center on constitutional changes that critics argue are designed to entrench the ruling Gnassingbé family's decades-long grip on power. The reforms have sparked outrage among Togolese youth who view them as the latest in a series of maneuvers to subvert democratic processes and prevent genuine political competition. When protesters took to the streets to voice their opposition, security forces responded with lethal force, firing live ammunition and tear gas into crowds and pursuing demonstrators even into private homes.

Among the victims was Jacques Koami Koutoglo, a fifteen-year-old who had just completed secondary school and dreamed of becoming a footballer. He spent his evenings practicing his moves and helped at his uncle's cafeteria during school breaks. On the morning of June 26, he vanished after hearing gunshots and tear gas fired by security forces. His family found his body in a lagoon a hundred meters from his home. According to eyewitnesses, security forces had chased down youths throughout the neighborhood, entering private courtyards and beating residents. "They came into our courtyard. They fired gas. They beat people," a neighbor recounted. Koutoglo's name has joined a growing list of young lives cut short during moments of national tension in Togo.

<!-- aeo:section end="togo-s-constitutional-crisis-youth-protests-meet-deadly-crackdow" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="government-blames-diaspora-restricts-internet-access" -->
## Government Blames Diaspora, Restricts Internet Access

The Togolese government has characterized the protests as inorganic, claiming they were fueled not by genuine domestic grievances but by the Togolese diaspora operating from abroad. In a strongly worded statement, the government accused influencers in the diaspora of using social media to spread disinformation, incitement to hatred, violence, incivility, and civil disobedience.

This accusation provided the government with a pretext to clamp down on internet access and social media platforms. According to NetBlocks, a digital rights organization that monitors and reports on internet access, social platforms TikTok, Facebook, and Telegram were restricted on the country's main internet provider, Togocom. Internet access in Togo remained limited as of 1 a.m. local time on July 9th, effectively silencing protesters' ability to organize and communicate their message to the outside world.

The government's response follows a familiar authoritarian playbook: when faced with domestic unrest, blame external agitators and cut off the digital infrastructure that enables coordination and documentation of state violence. By restricting social media access, the Togolese government has made it significantly more difficult for protesters to share evidence of the crackdown, organize future demonstrations, or build international solidarity for their cause.

<!-- aeo:section end="government-blames-diaspora-restricts-internet-access" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="international-silence-why-the-world-isn-t-watching-togo" -->
## International Silence: Why the World Isn't Watching Togo

The deadly crackdown in Togo has received remarkably little international attention, particularly when compared to other recent youth-led protests in Africa. Kenya's protests, which also turned deadly, triggered significant international reaction and media coverage. Yet the Togolese crisis has been met with near-total silence from the international community, including organizations typically expected to respond to such situations.

ECOWAS, the West African regional bloc that includes Togo, expressed "deep concern" and called for restraint—diplomatic language that essentially translates to "we don't want to get involved." The African Union has remained entirely silent on the matter, as has the United States government. This conspicuous lack of response raises questions about why Togo's crisis has failed to generate the international pressure that might constrain the government's violent response.

The silence may be strategic. Togo currently serves as the African Union's mediator and played a key role in the recent U.S.-brokered peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo following an outbreak of violence in eastern DRC. When Kigali and Kinshasa signed the agreement in Washington, Robert Dussey, the Togolese foreign minister, was in attendance. His presence underscored Togo's growing diplomatic importance in regional conflict resolution, which may explain why the international community has been reluctant to criticize the government's handling of domestic protests.

Fabien Offner, a researcher for Amnesty International, offered an alternative explanation for the international silence. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he claimed that Togo had become a "diplomatic blindspot"—essentially a country so small and seemingly insignificant that the international community lacks any incentive to intervene in its internal affairs. Despite this assessment, Offner urged the international community to act: "We need stronger, more vocal engagement from the African Union, ECOWAS, the United Nations, and key bilateral partners. Their silence emboldens the cycle of repression. They must speak out and act."

The reality, however, is that the world appears unlikely to listen. Togo lacks the strategic resources, geographic importance, or international profile that might compel major powers to pressure its government. With no external intervention forthcoming and the government firmly entrenched, the Togolese people are left to wonder what options remain available to them.

<!-- aeo:section end="international-silence-why-the-world-isn-t-watching-togo" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-illusion-of-democratic-alternatives" -->
## The Illusion of Democratic Alternatives

Government officials have suggested that protesters should pursue their grievances through democratic channels rather than taking to the streets. Gilbert Bawara, the minister of public service, argued in a statement to Al Jazeera that "If anyone disagrees, they can petition, they can participate in elections. These are the foundations of a democratic society."

Critics, however, argue that such avenues are largely symbolic under the current government. With the ruling UNIR party dominating institutions, controlling security forces, and systematically sidelining opposition figures through arrests, exile, and cooptation, many view the political playing field as fundamentally rigged. The very constitutional reforms that sparked the protests are seen as further evidence that the government manipulates democratic processes to maintain power rather than genuinely competing for it.

Paul Amegakpo, founder of the Tamberma Institute for Governance, told Al Jazeera: "There are democratic forms, yes, but they are hollow. The rules may exist on paper – elections, assemblies, petitions – but power in Togo is not contested on equal footing. It is captured and preserved through coercion, clientelism and constitutional engineering."

Amegakpo's assessment reflects the broader sentiment among the Togolese public, who believe that street protests represent the only tool capable of bringing the government to the negotiating table. When formal democratic channels are controlled by the very power structure being challenged, direct action becomes the only meaningful form of political expression available to citizens. This dynamic creates a dangerous cycle: the government refuses to engage with protests it deems illegitimate, while protesters see no alternative to demonstrations that the government violently suppresses.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-illusion-of-democratic-alternatives" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-cycle-continues-more-protests-planned-despite-deadly-respons" -->
## The Cycle Continues: More Protests Planned Despite Deadly Response

Despite the violent crackdown and the deaths of protesters like Jacques Koami Koutoglo, activists are planning subsequent protests for July 15th and 16th. They have also called for the postponement of municipal elections slated for July 17th, arguing that the current political climate and lack of consensus do not favor a free and fair electoral process.

The decision to continue protesting in the face of lethal state violence demonstrates both the depth of popular frustration with the government and the absence of viable alternatives for political expression. Protesters understand the risks—they have seen their peers killed, beaten, and pursued into their homes by security forces—yet they continue to organize because they perceive the constitutional reforms as an existential threat to any possibility of future democratic governance in Togo.

Togo appears destined for another wave of potentially deadly protests. The regime has no incentive to change its approach, having faced no meaningful international pressure for its violent response to the initial demonstrations. No outside power seems interested in intervening to protect protesters or pressure the government toward dialogue. And the citizens continue to feel fundamentally disenfranchised, viewing street protests as their only remaining tool for political participation.

Caught in the middle of this cycle are young people like Koutoglo, whose lives are cut short during moments of national tension. As things currently stand, more names appear set to join the list of those killed while demanding democratic accountability from their government. Tragically, their sacrifice may prove to be in vain—without international pressure or a shift in the government's calculus, the protests are unlikely to achieve their objectives, and the constitutional reforms they oppose will likely be implemented regardless of the human cost of resistance.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-cycle-continues-more-protests-planned-despite-deadly-respons" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="related-coverage" -->
## Related Coverage
- [The UAE is Destabilizing the Entire Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/conflicts/the-uae-is-destabilizing-the-entire-middle-east)
- [How the UAE's Regional Meddling Triggered a Historic Realignment Across the Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-destabilizing-middle-east-regional-realignment-2026)
- [The UAE's Regional Ambitions Collapse as Middle East Powers Push Back](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-regional-ambitions-collapse-middle-east-pushback)

<!-- aeo:section end="related-coverage" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="frequently-asked-questions" -->
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What tactics did the Houthis use to sink the Magic Seas and Eternity C?

The Houthis deployed sophisticated coordinated assaults combining manned speedboats carrying fighters with rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, unmanned surface vessels (drone boats laden with explosives), aerial drones, and missiles. Against the Magic Seas they committed eight manned boats and four drone boats, then boarded the stricken vessel, planted explosives, and deliberately sank it. The Eternity C was attacked with four speedboats and aerial drones that struck the ship's deck, bridge, and lifeboats.

### How did the July 2025 attacks compare to the Houthis' previous Red Sea campaign?

During their entire campaign from late 2023 through the end of 2024, the Houthis had sunk only two ships and killed four crew members total. In just two days in July 2025, they sank two more vessels and killed at least four crew members on the Eternity C alone, matching their previous totals and signaling a fundamental escalation in both lethality and operational commitment.

### What is the reported alliance between the Houthis and al-Shabaab, and why does it matter?

Reports indicate the Houthis are supplying al-Shabaab with weapons including drones and possibly guided missiles, while al-Shabaab provides piracy network diversions that draw coalition naval patrols away from Houthi smuggling routes. Al-Shabaab may also be providing targeting data: a full third of Houthi attacks in the Gulf of Aden have struck ships that should have been beyond Houthi radar range. If the two groups coordinate attacks jointly, the entire lower Red Sea and Gulf of Aden could fall within their combined operational range, potentially forcing all commercial traffic to reroute around Africa.

### Why is Ukraine targeting Mauritania as a strategic partner in Africa?

Mauritania shares more than 2,000 kilometers of border with Mali, where Russia's Africa Corps is completing its handover from Wagner Group operations. Russian mercenaries have repeatedly violated Mauritanian sovereignty by pursuing Tuareg militants across the border, creating serious diplomatic tensions. Ukraine is pursuing a military partnership to train Mauritanian soldiers and offer consumer-grade drone technology, positioning itself as a counterweight to Russian influence directly on the border of a Russian client state.

### How does Ukraine's African strategy threaten Russia's war effort?

By establishing embassies and military partnerships in nations unfriendly to Russia — particularly those bordering Russian client states — Ukraine can provide intelligence, training, and potentially direct support to groups opposing Russian mercenary forces in places like Mali. Russia extracts minerals, protection-service revenue, and geopolitical influence from its African operations, all of which support its invasion of Ukraine. Disrupting those operations either forces Moscow to divert resources from Ukraine to defend Africa, or accept degradation of its African presence and the loss of those supporting resources.

<!-- aeo:section end="frequently-asked-questions" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="sources" -->
## Sources
- <https://www.ft.com/content/e08ab9e5-99be-449b-abe6-e65e5d18cf55>
- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ship-risk-sinking-after-first-houthi-red-sea-attack-this-year-2025-07-07/>
- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce9xdlxp1x7o>
- <https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/israel-yemen-houthis-airstrikes-red-sea-missile-shipping-rcna217172>
- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-15edf75586540201f63b7c33348fb737>
- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/crew-greek-ship-hit-off-yemen-safe-vessel-risks-sinking-operator-says-2025-07-07/>
- <https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/crew-abandons-ship-attacked-red-sea-uk-military-123519387>
- <https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20250706-israel-yemen-houthi>
- <https://www.twz.com/news-features/houthis-launch-first-red-sea-attack-on-shipping-since-december>
- <https://maritime-executive.com/article/houthis-claim-bulker-sank-after-yesterday-s-attack-in-the-red-sea>
- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-6dc55ee05a9d1e78621788aa0bc52168?utm_source=dailybrief&utm_content=20250708&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyBrief2025july8&utm_term=DailyNewsBrief>
- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/9/five-rescued-after-suspected-attack-by-yemens-houthis-on-red-sea-vessel>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/09/rescuers-search-for-crew-of-cargo-ship-eternity-c-that-sank-after-being-attacked-in-red-sea>
- <https://apnews.com/video/yemens-houthi-rebels-release-video-of-their-deadly-attack-on-cargo-ship-in-red-sea-d59ebfa86f4d4a0d929c1b65bcfac6b1>
- <https://www.euronews.com/2025/07/09/rescuers-search-for-survivors-after-three-sailors-killed-in-houthi-attack-in-red-sea>
- <https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/08/world/middleeast/red-sea-ship-attack.html>
- <https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-yemen-houthis-israel-6dc55ee05a9d1e78621788aa0bc52168>
- <https://www.ft.com/content/503b9f75-f3a0-40b1-bc64-a9f2ffd7376f>
- <https://newlinesmag.com/spotlight/a-pact-between-al-shabab-and-the-houthis-threatens-red-sea-shipping/>
- <https://www.btl-research.com/p/the-houthis-and-al-shabaab-mounting?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1709097&post_id=166831745&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1if49o&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email>
- <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/africa-shoestring-ukraine-seeks-allies-with-aid-embassies-2025-06-25/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=Weekend-Briefing&utm_term=062825&lctg=6422d13ff77d798afe06361d>
- <https://www.theafricareport.com/386539/youll-get-the-bill-soon-ukraine-warns-africa-over-russias-embrace/>
- <https://ecfr.eu/article/the-other-counter-offensive-ukraines-diplomatic-push-in-africa/>
- <https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/lifestyle/ukraine-counters-russias-africa-influence-with-military-training-offer-in-west-africa/5zrgqy4>
- <https://adf-magazine.com/2024/05/mali-wagner-incursions-into-mauritania-spark-tension/>
- <https://www.voaafrica.com/a/mauritanian-defense-minister-arrives-in-mali-to-ease-tensions/7578776.html>
- <https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/africasource/mauritania-should-mediate-in-mali-heres-how/>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/06/ukrainian-special-forces-sudan-russian-mercenaries-wagner>
- <https://www.wsj.com/world/ukraine-is-now-fighting-russia-in-sudan-87caf1d8?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAi1lJUpbVjv0XgfUaCSLWUouLlK7Xf87CHdJ5TgmmFalvuuj6feDKG8TvJCEAk%3D&gaa_ts=68642314&gaa_sig=_9dgqn56pSWNdlMpFwvtDgG2dNWwhgviw9QSRCnChsZK9ZJFTu-FGSAdnLwVYp5OAb2RBtSpekZ00K5MgwQ7ow%3D%3D>
- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg9eked5vgo>
- <https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-08-28/ukraines-alleged-support-for-tuareg-rebels-fighting-wagner-mercenaries-further-poisons-sahel-conflict.html>
- <https://civil.ge/archives/663473>
- <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0jwnykl10o>
- <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64495403>
- <https://youtu.be/KsQTIceriwk?si=DkZP7AAyvX-2cnul&t=162>
- <https://meduza.io/en/feature/2025/06/06/georgia-s-democratic-reckoning>
- <https://www.facebook.com/reel/980480050215675>
- <https://oc-media.org/eu-parliament-calls-for-sanctions-against-ivanishvili-and-others-and-non-recognition-of-georgian-dream-government/>
- <https://formulanews.ge/News/114836>
- <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20250204IPR26689/meps-georgia-s-self-proclaimed-authorities-have-no-legitimacy>
- <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20241121IPR25549/parliament-calls-for-new-elections-in-georgia>
- <https://www.politico.eu/article/romania-election-loser-far-right-george-simion-challenges-results-court/>
- <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CTrkN6aQDU&t=1523s>
- <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/05/georgia-women-protesters-are-targeted-with-escalating-violence-and-gender-based-reprisals/?utm_source=chatgpt.com>
- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/4/togo-protests-signal-youth-anger-at-dynastic-rule-but-is-change-possible>
- <https://www.dw.com/en/togo-rights-groups-report-several-killed-in-demonstrations/a-73111065>
- <https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/togo-protests-gnassingbe/?nsl_bypass_cache=52a7f52acc4988b884d36304d3b9c0d3>
- <https://www.amnesty.nl/actueel/togo-testimonies-provide-glimpse-into-violent-repression-of-protests>
- <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/06/togo-protesters-tortured/>
- <https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/west-africa/togo-soldiers-break-up-protests-against-longtime-leader-5096628>

&lt;!-- youtube:_HBqKGnPY34 --&gt;
<!-- aeo:section end="sources" -->