---
title: "Thailand and Cambodia Border Conflict: Historical Grievances Erupt into Armed Clashes"
description: "On July 24th, 2025, the long-simmering territorial dispute between Thailand and Cambodia over the Preah Vihear temple region erupted into open warfare. What began as a single fatal skirmish on May 28th has escalated through diplomatic breakdowns, leaked phone calls, and political crises into artillery bombardments of civilian areas and Thai F-16 airstrikes on Cambodian military positions. By mid-afternoon local time on Thursday, eleven Thai civilians had been killed, including an eight-year-old boy, with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas. The conflict represents a dramatic escalation in a dispute rooted in colonial-era treaties, Cold War tensions, and nationalist grievances that have festered for over a century.\n\n## Key Takeaways\n- The current conflict stems from a May 28th, 2025 border patrol encounter that left one Cambodian soldier dead, with both sides claiming self-defense.\n- The dispute centers on 4.6 square kilometers of land surrounding the ancient Preah Vihear temple, which Thailand claims despite International Court of Justice rulings in 1962 and 2013 awarding the area to Cambodia.\n- A leaked phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen inflamed Thai nationalist sentiment, leading to mass protests and her suspension by the Constitutional Court on July 1st.\n- By July 24th, the conflict had expanded beyond border skirmishes to include heavy artillery bombardment of civilian areas—including a hospital and gas station—and Thai F-16 airstrikes on Cambodian military divisions.\n- Eleven Thai civilians were killed, including an eight-year-old boy, with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas by mid-afternoon on July 24th.\n\n## The Fatal Encounter That Sparked the Crisis\n\nThe chain of events leading to Thursday's violence began on May 28th, when Thai and Cambodian patrols encountered each other in the disputed region between Cambodia's Preah Vihear province and Thailand's Ubon Ratchathani province. The area lies within the Emerald Triangle, where the borders of Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos converge. Rather than passing peacefully, the two patrols opened fire on each other in a ten-minute skirmish that resulted in the death of one Cambodian soldier. When questioned about who initiated the shooting, both sides pointed fingers at the other and claimed self-defense.\n\nInitially, there were attempts at de-escalation. Royal Thai Army Commander-in-Chief Pana Klaewplodthuk and Commander of the Royal Cambodian Army General Mao Sophan met face-to-face to calm the situation. However, by early June, both commanders were ordering troops to the border, a move that received enthusiastic support from nationalists in both countries. What might normally have been resolved through diplomatic channels instead became a catalyst for escalating tensions, driven by deeper historical grievances and domestic political pressures that made backing down politically untenable for leaders on both sides.\n\n## Colonial Legacy and the Roots of Territorial Dispute\n\nTo understand why a border skirmish escalated so dramatically, it's necessary to examine the historical wounds that have never fully healed. During the colonial period, Siam—present-day Thailand—found itself wedged between two imperial powers: British India to the west and French Indochina to the east. Surrounded and wary of suffering the fate of its colonized neighbors, Siam was forced to make a series of territorial concessions to maintain its independence.\n\nOne such agreement was the 1907 Franco-Siamese Treaty, which saw territories handed over to France and administratively attached to Cambodia. Among these territories was Preah Vihear, a region situated in the Dangrek mountain range, made particularly distinctive by its ancient hilltop temple of the same name. Though originally Hindu, the temple was built during the Khmer Empire and represents an important site of architectural, spiritual, and cultural heritage.\n\nThe territorial arrangement established by this colonial-era treaty has remained contentious ever since. Although Thailand today accepts that the temple itself belongs to Cambodia, it claims parts of the surrounding area as Thai territory. This dispute came to international attention in 2008 when Cambodia successfully applied for the temple to be listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Thailand objected out of fear that the listing would be interpreted as Cambodian sovereignty over the contested surrounding land, not just the temple structure itself.\n\n## World War II and the Failed Attempt at Reclamation\n\nThe impact of the 1907 treaty extended far beyond diplomatic disagreements. Motivated by nationalist pride and bitter resentment at what many Thais viewed as the injustices of the colonial-era concessions, Thailand sided with Imperial Japan during World War II and retook the land by force. This wartime occupation represented an attempt to reverse what Thai nationalists saw as historical wrongs imposed by European imperial powers.\n\nHowever, this territorial gain proved short-lived. The end of World War II saw France retake control of the regions Thailand had occupied during the conflict. France's control also proved temporary, as the wave of decolonization swept through Southeast Asia in the following years. When Cambodia gained independence in 1953, it took its territorial claims to the International Court of Justice.\n\nIn 1962, the ICJ ruled that the temple was situated on Cambodian territory, a decision that Thailand reluctantly accepted regarding the temple structure itself but has never fully embraced regarding the surrounding land. Much later, in 2013, the ICJ would further rule that the land around the temple was also Cambodian. This ruling made little practical difference to Bangkok, which rejects the court's authority on the matter. To this day, Bangkok still lays claim to 4.6 square kilometers of land surrounding the temple, forced to watch as Cambodia exerts control with international backing and no intention of relinquishing its hold.\n\n## Cold War Tensions and the Militarized Border\n\nThe period between the 1962 ICJ ruling and the 2013 follow-up decision was far from peaceful. In the late 1960s, Cambodia descended into a brutal civil war that ultimately led to the rise of the Khmer Rouge, the leadership of Pol Pot, and the Cambodian Genocide. The Khmer Rouge were only overthrown when Vietnam invaded and occupied the country, a development that transformed the disputed border into a Cold War frontline.\n\nWith Vietnam under communist control and Thailand acting as a conduit for Western support to anti-Vietnamese resistance forces, the border experienced frequent clashes and became heavily fortified on both sides. This period established patterns of military confrontation and mutual suspicion that would persist long after the Cold War ended. Although Vietnam withdrew from Cambodian territory in 1989 as the Cold War drew to a close, the border remained a sensitive matter, with both sides maintaining significant military presences in the disputed areas.\n\n## Recent Clashes and the Pattern of De-escalation\n\nDespite these deep-rooted tensions, actual fighting in recent years has been unusual, though not unprecedented. Between 2008 and 2011, on-and-off fighting saw artillery hit the temple itself, with the New York Times reporting that a single week in 2011 saw 15 people killed. However, the general trend has been for quick de-escalation, with diplomatic channels typically succeeding in preventing minor incidents from spiraling into larger conflicts.\n\nNormally, something like the fighting seen on May 28th would have been followed by a heavy diplomatic push to defuse tensions, with both sides finding face-saving ways to step back from the brink. The international community, regional organizations, and domestic political considerations have historically combined to create strong incentives for restraint. This pattern of escalation followed by rapid de-escalation has characterized the Preah Vihear dispute for decades, making the current situation all the more remarkable for breaking this established pattern.\n\n## The Leaked Phone Call That Changed Everything\n\nWhat made 2025 different was the convergence of domestic political crises with the border tensions. As Cambodia banned Thai films from TV and cinemas, cut internet bandwidth from Thailand, and suspended certain food and energy imports, Bangkok responded by closing border crossings into Cambodia to almost all travelers, including tourists and traders. These tit-for-tat measures raised tensions but might still have been manageable through traditional diplomatic channels.\n\nThen came a strange twist that would prove politically catastrophic for Thailand's leadership. A phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was published in full by the latter after an initial clip was leaked. Intended to cool things down, the call instead wound up turning the heat in Thailand up to eleven.\n\nIn the call, Shinawatra took a deferential tone toward Hun Sen, whom she addressed as 'uncle,' promising to 'take care' of anything he wanted. More damagingly, she came under fire for criticizing a Thai military commander, who she said 'just wanted to look tough' during the escalation. To give context, publicly criticizing the army is the reddest of red lines in Thailand, where the armed forces are a source of national pride deeply linked to the revered monarchy.\n\n## The Military's Role in Thai Politics\n\nThe military has historically played a significant role in Thai politics, even taking control through coups on multiple occasions. Despite not formally being in power at the time of the crisis, it continues to exert influence over the government and key institutions. Former Leader of the now-defunct Move Forward Party, Pita Limjaroenrat, stated in a recent interview: 'Thai politics is deadlocked by design. It was organized by the military junta to ensure that the constitution includes mechanisms for changing the election outcome. That happened to me and it's what's hitting her as well.'\n\nSenior Fellow Joshua Kurlantzick wrote for the Council on Foreign Relations: 'Angering the military is never a good idea in Thailand. A military that feels greater strength, a weak civilian leader, and a surge of nationalism raises the real fear of a coup, in a country infamous for them.' This analysis would prove prescient as events unfolded in the weeks following the leaked phone call.\n\n## Political Crisis and the Prime Minister's Suspension\n\nAfter the call was leaked, Shinawatra, who became the country's youngest-ever Prime Minister in August 2024, was accused of being too politically naive to protect the country's national interests. She later issued an apology, claiming: 'I had no intent to do it for my own interest. I only thought about how to avoid chaos, avoid fighting, and to avoid loss of lives.' Unfortunately for her political career, the rabbit of inflamed nationalist opinion was very much out of the hat, and it was going to take more than an apologetic carrot to lure it back in.\n\nBy the end of June, there were mass protests on the streets of Bangkok, demanding Shinawatra's resignation. The protests were the largest seen since the ruling Pheu Thai party came to power in 2023. The people wanted a leader who could confront the Cambodian border crisis with resolve—not fold under the pressure. Then, on July 1st, Thailand's Constitutional Court voted by seven votes to two to suspend the PM following a petition from 36 senators, who alleged dishonesty and a breach of ethical standards. The court was expected to take 45 to 60 days to reach a verdict from the day she was suspended, although events since then have obviously overtaken the process.\n\n## Economic Pressures and Weak Leadership on Both Sides\n\nIn a different world, a domestic political crisis like this might have provided enough distraction from the issue of the border to allow for some behind-the-scenes de-escalation. After all, both Bangkok and Phnom Penh had plenty of other concerns demanding attention. Thailand was suffering from a weak government with a fragile majority in the House of Representatives, just as sluggish investment, limited productivity growth, and US tariff concerns took their toll. Even before she was suspended, research by the National Institute of Development Administration showed Shinawatra was polling well with just 9.2% of people.\n\nAcross the border, Cambodia's woes were, if anything, even worse. As the BBC's correspondent wrote: 'In Cambodia you've got an economy that is really struggling. You have a Prime Minister who is the son of a former strongman and does not yet really have his own authority and you have in Hun Sen, his father, a man who appears willing to push this conflict further in order to burnish his own nationalist credentials.' Yet despite—or perhaps because of—these problems, both sides seemed more interested in escalation than backing down.\n\n## Cambodia's Conscription Announcement\n\nOn July 14th, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet announced that his country would implement military conscription in 2026. The Military Conscription Law, which was approved in 2006 but never enforced, requires Cambodians aged 18 to 30 to serve for 24 months. This announcement represented a significant escalation in rhetoric and preparation for potential conflict.\n\nFrom a purely material standpoint, Phnom Penh was probably unwise to raise tensions in this manner. Thailand has overwhelming military strength relative to Cambodia. This massive disparity in military capability is one reason why a serious war has never erupted over Preah Vihear before. Indeed, before the shooting incident on May 28th, diplomatic relations between the two nations were even warming, suggesting that rational calculations of military balance had historically served as a brake on escalation.\n\n## Thursday's Escalation: Artillery and Airstrikes\n\nThen came Thursday, July 24th, and all common sense seemed to go out the window. Beyond simple gunfire between army units, the conflict expanded into heavy shelling, including of civilian areas. At the time of recording, it was impossible to say for certain which side fired first, with each nation predictably blaming the other.\n\nWhat can be established is that this all kicked off when a landmine exploded and injured five Thai soldiers on Wednesday. Bangkok responded by sealing the border that same night. By morning, clashes had again erupted around the temple at Preah Vihear. This time, though, the fighting didn't stay contained to military-on-military engagements.\n\nAccording to Thai media, Cambodia's army shelled the Phanom Dong Rak Hospital, causing casualties, while civilians were also killed when Cambodian artillery struck a Thai gas station. By shortly before 3pm local time, Thailand was reporting that eleven civilians had been killed across three different provinces—including an eight-year-old boy—with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas. For its part, Cambodia had yet to release casualty figures by the time production began on this analysis.\n\n## Thai Air Power Enters the Fight\n\nThe conflict took on a new dimension when Thai F-16s bombed the 8th and 9th Infantry Divisions of the Royal Cambodian Army. This represented a significant escalation beyond artillery exchanges and ground combat, demonstrating Thailand's willingness to employ its substantial air superiority in the conflict. Prime Minister Hun Manet declared: 'Cambodia has always taken a stand to solve problems peacefully, but in this case we have no choice but to respond with armed forces against armed aggression.'\n\nThe use of fighter jets to bomb neighboring military positions, combined with the unrestrained use of artillery on civilian areas, seemed well beyond anything observers might have expected even a few days prior. The civilian death toll at the time of recording was already approaching that seen during the 2011 clashes and may have exceeded it subsequently.\n\n## The Military Balance and Strategic Calculations\n\nThe power imbalance between Bangkok and Phnom Penh isn't some minor factor that Cambodia can hand wave away. Thailand's air force is operating 35 F-16s among other combat aircraft, while Cambodia can muster a mere 21 helicopters. Were this to escalate into a full-blown conflict, the disparity would be overwhelming—comparable to a mismatched boxing bout with a predetermined outcome.\n\nThis raises the question of why Cambodia would allow tensions to escalate to this point given its obvious military disadvantage. The answer likely lies in the domestic political dynamics on both sides, where nationalist sentiment and the need to appear strong have overridden rational strategic calculations. For Hun Sen, the former leader still wielding significant influence, pushing the conflict may serve to burnish nationalist credentials and distract from economic struggles. For Thailand's military, the opportunity to teach Cambodia a lesson and potentially reclaim disputed territory may have proven too tempting to resist, especially with a suspended civilian leader unable to effectively restrain military action.\n\n## Regional Diplomacy and ASEAN's Limited Role\n\nBeyond the bilateral military balance, there's the wider diplomatic angle to consider. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) exists in part to stop war from breaking out among its member states. In theory, regional heavy hitters should now step in and attempt to put out the fire before it spreads further.\n\nHowever, it's an open question how effective ASEAN can be in this crisis. The body lacks an effective dispute resolution mechanism and has utterly failed to calm the ongoing fighting in Myanmar's civil war, raising doubts about its ability to mediate between Thailand and Cambodia. The organization's principle of non-interference in member states' internal affairs, while designed to maintain regional harmony, can also limit its effectiveness in resolving conflicts once they erupt.\n\n## The Leadership Vacuum and Prospects for Escalation\n\nThe unknown factor in determining whether this conflict will escalate further or de-escalate is how the lack of effective leadership in both societies might affect things in the coming hours and days. Thailand has a weak government and a strong military that wants to retake the land around Preah Vihear and teach Cambodia a lesson. Cambodia, meanwhile, faces its own governance challenges, with its foreign policy apparently driven by a stubborn former leader happy to inflame nationalism to maintain popularity at home.\n\nAlready, the consequences of this leadership vacuum are visible. The civilian death toll at the time of recording was already approaching that seen in 2011 and may have exceeded it subsequently. The unrestrained use of artillery on civilian areas and fighter jets bombarding a neighbor seem well beyond anything observers might have expected even a few days prior to Thursday's escalation.\n\n## A Grim Reminder of Changing International Norms\n\nThere are many reasons to believe de-escalation remains the most likely option. The massive military imbalance favors a quick Thai victory if the conflict continues, which may encourage Cambodia to seek a face-saving exit. Regional diplomatic pressure through ASEAN and other channels will likely intensify. Both countries face serious economic challenges that would only be exacerbated by prolonged conflict. And the historical pattern has been for these border disputes to flare up briefly before being tamped down through diplomatic channels.\n\nHowever, even if tensions are dramatically dialed down in the coming days, Thursday's events serve as a stark reminder that we live in unusual times. There seems to be a growing tendency for states to resort to force far quicker than they would have done in the recent past. The year 2025 appears to be turning all sorts of simmering disputes—such as between Iran and Israel, or India and Pakistan—into sharp, sudden wars.\n\nThis may turn out to be just another skirmish in the long history of the Preah Vihear dispute, or it may turn out to be the start of something more significant. Either way, there's no denying that the world today is just that little bit more grim and tragic than it was 24 hours prior. The ease with which historical grievances, nationalist sentiment, and political weakness can combine to produce armed conflict between neighbors serves as a sobering lesson about the fragility of peace, even in regions that have enjoyed relative stability for decades.\n\n## Related Coverage\n- [The UAE is Destabilizing the Entire Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/conflicts/the-uae-is-destabilizing-the-entire-middle-east)\n- [How the UAE's Regional Meddling Triggered a Historic Realignment Across the Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-destabilizing-middle-east-regional-realignment-2026)\n- [The UAE's Regional Ambitions Collapse as Middle East Powers Push Back](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-regional-ambitions-collapse-middle-east-pushback)\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n### What triggered the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict in 2025?\n\nOn May 28th, 2025, Thai and Cambodian patrols encountered each other in the disputed Emerald Triangle region and opened fire in a ten-minute skirmish that killed one Cambodian soldier. Both sides claimed self-defense. Rather than de-escalating through diplomacy as in past incidents, the encounter spiraled due to nationalist sentiment, tit-for-tat economic measures, a leaked phone call, and a political crisis in Thailand.\n\n### What is the Preah Vihear temple dispute about?\n\nThe dispute centers on the ancient Preah Vihear temple and 4.6 square kilometers of surrounding land in the Dangrek mountain range. The territory was ceded to France under the 1907 Franco-Siamese Treaty and later became part of Cambodia. The International Court of Justice ruled in 1962 that the temple belongs to Cambodia and in 2013 that the surrounding land does as well. Thailand accepts the temple is Cambodian but rejects the ICJ's authority over the surrounding territory and continues to claim it.\n\n### What was the leaked phone call and why did it matter?\n\nA phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was published in full by Hun Sen after an initial clip was leaked. In the call, Shinawatra took a deferential tone, addressed Hun Sen as 'uncle,' promised to 'take care' of anything he wanted, and criticized a Thai military commander for wanting to 'look tough.' Publicly criticizing the Thai military is considered a major taboo in Thailand, where the armed forces are deeply linked to the monarchy. The call inflamed nationalist sentiment, triggered mass protests, and contributed to her suspension by the Constitutional Court.\n\n### What happened on July 24th, 2025?\n\nAfter a landmine injured five Thai soldiers on Wednesday July 23rd, Bangkok sealed the border. By Thursday morning, clashes erupted around Preah Vihear and expanded into heavy shelling of civilian areas. Thai media reported that Cambodia's army shelled the Phanom Dong Rak Hospital and a gas station, killing eleven Thai civilians across three provinces, including an eight-year-old boy. Up to 40,000 people were evacuated. Thai F-16s bombed the 8th and 9th Infantry Divisions of the Royal Cambodian Army, marking a significant escalation.\n\n### How do the military capabilities of Thailand and Cambodia compare, and why did Cambodia allow tensions to escalate anyway?\n\nThailand has overwhelming military superiority, operating 35 F-16s among other combat aircraft while Cambodia can muster only 21 helicopters. This disparity had historically served as a brake on escalation. The most likely explanation for Cambodia's willingness to push the conflict is domestic politics: former leader Hun Sen appeared willing to inflame nationalism to maintain his influence and distract from Cambodia's struggling economy, even though a full-scale war would almost certainly end in a devastating Cambodian defeat.\n\n## Sources\n- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3038380/army-chiefs-try-to-resolve-thai-cambodian-border-dispute>\n- <https://asianews.network/thai-cambodian-army-chiefs-agree-to-resolve-border-dispute-through-joint-committee/#:~:text=The%20Nation,concluding%20with%20the%20following%20agreements:>\n- <https://www.reuters.com/world/china/thailand-cambodia-reinforcing-troops-disputed-border-after-may-skirmish-thai-2025-06-07/>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/03/thailand-cambodia-leaked-phone-call-shinawatra-dynasty-paetongtarn>\n- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/16/thailands-ruling-coalition-nominates-paetongtarn-as-pm-parliament-to-vote>\n- <https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/southeast-asia/thailand-pm-paetongtarn-resign-cambodia-leaked-phone-call-b2773098.html>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/20/thai-prime-minister-paetongtarn-shinawatra-apologises-phone-leak-crisis-cambodia-hun-sen>\n- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9vrrj72xy7o>\n- <https://news.sky.com/story/thai-pm-paetongtarn-shinawatra-suspended-amid-outrage-over-leaked-phone-call-13390861>\n- <https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/thai-protesters-call-prime-minister-paetongtarns-resignation-2025-06-28/>\n- <https://www.nationthailand.com/blogs/news/politics/40052519>\n- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3060108/pm-paetongtarns-popularity-plummets-in-thai-opinion-poll>\n- <https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/asean/suspended-thai-pm-asks-court-more-time-respond-ethics-case>\n- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3068932/national-anti-corruption-commission-takes-up-pms-phone-call-case>\n- <https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20250715_20/>\n- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27292633>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/07/thai-court-orders-yingluck-shinawatra-resign>\n- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41410047>\n- <https://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/28/asia/yingluck-shinawatra-asylum>\n- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/1/thailand-pm-paetongtarn-shinawatra-father-thaksin-face-legal-peril>\n- <https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/07/16/asia-pacific/thaksin-defamation-court/>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/17/former-thai-pm-thaksin-shinawatra-about-to-be-released-on-parole>\n- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/24/thailand-army-closes-cambodia-border-crossings-as-territorial-tensions-escalate-paetongtarn-shinawatra-hun-sen#:~:text=The%20latest%20border%20closures%20follow,for%20visitors%20from%20either%20country>\n- <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Khmer-Rouge>\n- <https://www.nytimes.com/1985/03/07/world/thai-forces-clash-with-vietnam.html#:~:text=Thai%20troops%20and%20aircraft%20attacked%20Vietnamese%20forces,to%20surround%20the%20last%20major%20Cambodian%20resistance>\n- <https://en.news.un.org/en/story/2013/11/455062>\n- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3042720/asean>\n- <https://www.cfr.org/blog/thailand-cambodia-border-conflict-causing-havoc-southeast-asia-and-worries-another-thai-coup>\n- <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/17/thailand-cambodia-border-disputeasean-hun-manet-paetongtarn/>\n- <https://monocle.com/affairs/thailand-politics-prime-minister-resignation-protests/>\n- <https://khmer.voanews.com/a/thailand-withdraws-from-world-heritage-convention-in-temple-dispute-with-cambodia-124589479/1358343.html>\n\n<!-- youtube:EcSI9Tx6cRs -->"
url: https://warfronts.pub/article/thailand-cambodia-border-conflict-preah-vihear-temple-dispute.md
canonical: https://warfronts.pub/article/thailand-cambodia-border-conflict-preah-vihear-temple-dispute
datePublished: 2026-02-17
dateModified: 2026-02-17
author:
  - name: Simon Whistler
    url: https://warfronts.pub/author/simon-whistler
publisher: Warfronts
image: "https://media.warfronts.pub/cdn-cgi/image/width=1600,height=900,fit=cover,quality=80,format=auto/articles/EcSI9Tx6cRs/hero.jpg"
type: NewsArticle
contentHash: 499fca3ccdf18dec914c4a865858db58e7f0dc6a9d877c62e110236e5ba69e7a
tokens: 6902
summaryUrl: https://warfronts.pub/article/thailand-cambodia-border-conflict-preah-vihear-temple-dispute.md.summary.md
---

<!-- aeo:section start="lede" -->
On July 24th, 2025, the long-simmering territorial dispute between Thailand and Cambodia over the Preah Vihear temple region erupted into open warfare. What began as a single fatal skirmish on May 28th has escalated through diplomatic breakdowns, leaked phone calls, and political crises into artillery bombardments of civilian areas and Thai F-16 airstrikes on Cambodian military positions. By mid-afternoon local time on Thursday, eleven Thai civilians had been killed, including an eight-year-old boy, with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas. The conflict represents a dramatic escalation in a dispute rooted in colonial-era treaties, Cold War tensions, and nationalist grievances that have festered for over a century.

<!-- aeo:section end="lede" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="key-takeaways" -->
## Key Takeaways
- The current conflict stems from a May 28th, 2025 border patrol encounter that left one Cambodian soldier dead, with both sides claiming self-defense.
- The dispute centers on 4.6 square kilometers of land surrounding the ancient Preah Vihear temple, which Thailand claims despite International Court of Justice rulings in 1962 and 2013 awarding the area to Cambodia.
- A leaked phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen inflamed Thai nationalist sentiment, leading to mass protests and her suspension by the Constitutional Court on July 1st.
- By July 24th, the conflict had expanded beyond border skirmishes to include heavy artillery bombardment of civilian areas—including a hospital and gas station—and Thai F-16 airstrikes on Cambodian military divisions.
- Eleven Thai civilians were killed, including an eight-year-old boy, with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas by mid-afternoon on July 24th.

<!-- aeo:section end="key-takeaways" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-fatal-encounter-that-sparked-the-crisis" -->
## The Fatal Encounter That Sparked the Crisis

The chain of events leading to Thursday's violence began on May 28th, when Thai and Cambodian patrols encountered each other in the disputed region between Cambodia's Preah Vihear province and Thailand's Ubon Ratchathani province. The area lies within the Emerald Triangle, where the borders of Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos converge. Rather than passing peacefully, the two patrols opened fire on each other in a ten-minute skirmish that resulted in the death of one Cambodian soldier. When questioned about who initiated the shooting, both sides pointed fingers at the other and claimed self-defense.

Initially, there were attempts at de-escalation. Royal Thai Army Commander-in-Chief Pana Klaewplodthuk and Commander of the Royal Cambodian Army General Mao Sophan met face-to-face to calm the situation. However, by early June, both commanders were ordering troops to the border, a move that received enthusiastic support from nationalists in both countries. What might normally have been resolved through diplomatic channels instead became a catalyst for escalating tensions, driven by deeper historical grievances and domestic political pressures that made backing down politically untenable for leaders on both sides.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-fatal-encounter-that-sparked-the-crisis" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="colonial-legacy-and-the-roots-of-territorial-dispute" -->
## Colonial Legacy and the Roots of Territorial Dispute

To understand why a border skirmish escalated so dramatically, it's necessary to examine the historical wounds that have never fully healed. During the colonial period, Siam—present-day Thailand—found itself wedged between two imperial powers: British India to the west and French Indochina to the east. Surrounded and wary of suffering the fate of its colonized neighbors, Siam was forced to make a series of territorial concessions to maintain its independence.

One such agreement was the 1907 Franco-Siamese Treaty, which saw territories handed over to France and administratively attached to Cambodia. Among these territories was Preah Vihear, a region situated in the Dangrek mountain range, made particularly distinctive by its ancient hilltop temple of the same name. Though originally Hindu, the temple was built during the Khmer Empire and represents an important site of architectural, spiritual, and cultural heritage.

The territorial arrangement established by this colonial-era treaty has remained contentious ever since. Although Thailand today accepts that the temple itself belongs to Cambodia, it claims parts of the surrounding area as Thai territory. This dispute came to international attention in 2008 when Cambodia successfully applied for the temple to be listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Thailand objected out of fear that the listing would be interpreted as Cambodian sovereignty over the contested surrounding land, not just the temple structure itself.

<!-- aeo:section end="colonial-legacy-and-the-roots-of-territorial-dispute" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="world-war-ii-and-the-failed-attempt-at-reclamation" -->
## World War II and the Failed Attempt at Reclamation

The impact of the 1907 treaty extended far beyond diplomatic disagreements. Motivated by nationalist pride and bitter resentment at what many Thais viewed as the injustices of the colonial-era concessions, Thailand sided with Imperial Japan during World War II and retook the land by force. This wartime occupation represented an attempt to reverse what Thai nationalists saw as historical wrongs imposed by European imperial powers.

However, this territorial gain proved short-lived. The end of World War II saw France retake control of the regions Thailand had occupied during the conflict. France's control also proved temporary, as the wave of decolonization swept through Southeast Asia in the following years. When Cambodia gained independence in 1953, it took its territorial claims to the International Court of Justice.

In 1962, the ICJ ruled that the temple was situated on Cambodian territory, a decision that Thailand reluctantly accepted regarding the temple structure itself but has never fully embraced regarding the surrounding land. Much later, in 2013, the ICJ would further rule that the land around the temple was also Cambodian. This ruling made little practical difference to Bangkok, which rejects the court's authority on the matter. To this day, Bangkok still lays claim to 4.6 square kilometers of land surrounding the temple, forced to watch as Cambodia exerts control with international backing and no intention of relinquishing its hold.

<!-- aeo:section end="world-war-ii-and-the-failed-attempt-at-reclamation" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="cold-war-tensions-and-the-militarized-border" -->
## Cold War Tensions and the Militarized Border

The period between the 1962 ICJ ruling and the 2013 follow-up decision was far from peaceful. In the late 1960s, Cambodia descended into a brutal civil war that ultimately led to the rise of the Khmer Rouge, the leadership of Pol Pot, and the Cambodian Genocide. The Khmer Rouge were only overthrown when Vietnam invaded and occupied the country, a development that transformed the disputed border into a Cold War frontline.

With Vietnam under communist control and Thailand acting as a conduit for Western support to anti-Vietnamese resistance forces, the border experienced frequent clashes and became heavily fortified on both sides. This period established patterns of military confrontation and mutual suspicion that would persist long after the Cold War ended. Although Vietnam withdrew from Cambodian territory in 1989 as the Cold War drew to a close, the border remained a sensitive matter, with both sides maintaining significant military presences in the disputed areas.

<!-- aeo:section end="cold-war-tensions-and-the-militarized-border" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="recent-clashes-and-the-pattern-of-de-escalation" -->
## Recent Clashes and the Pattern of De-escalation

Despite these deep-rooted tensions, actual fighting in recent years has been unusual, though not unprecedented. Between 2008 and 2011, on-and-off fighting saw artillery hit the temple itself, with the New York Times reporting that a single week in 2011 saw 15 people killed. However, the general trend has been for quick de-escalation, with diplomatic channels typically succeeding in preventing minor incidents from spiraling into larger conflicts.

Normally, something like the fighting seen on May 28th would have been followed by a heavy diplomatic push to defuse tensions, with both sides finding face-saving ways to step back from the brink. The international community, regional organizations, and domestic political considerations have historically combined to create strong incentives for restraint. This pattern of escalation followed by rapid de-escalation has characterized the Preah Vihear dispute for decades, making the current situation all the more remarkable for breaking this established pattern.

<!-- aeo:section end="recent-clashes-and-the-pattern-of-de-escalation" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-leaked-phone-call-that-changed-everything" -->
## The Leaked Phone Call That Changed Everything

What made 2025 different was the convergence of domestic political crises with the border tensions. As Cambodia banned Thai films from TV and cinemas, cut internet bandwidth from Thailand, and suspended certain food and energy imports, Bangkok responded by closing border crossings into Cambodia to almost all travelers, including tourists and traders. These tit-for-tat measures raised tensions but might still have been manageable through traditional diplomatic channels.

Then came a strange twist that would prove politically catastrophic for Thailand's leadership. A phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was published in full by the latter after an initial clip was leaked. Intended to cool things down, the call instead wound up turning the heat in Thailand up to eleven.

In the call, Shinawatra took a deferential tone toward Hun Sen, whom she addressed as 'uncle,' promising to 'take care' of anything he wanted. More damagingly, she came under fire for criticizing a Thai military commander, who she said 'just wanted to look tough' during the escalation. To give context, publicly criticizing the army is the reddest of red lines in Thailand, where the armed forces are a source of national pride deeply linked to the revered monarchy.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-leaked-phone-call-that-changed-everything" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-military-s-role-in-thai-politics" -->
## The Military's Role in Thai Politics

The military has historically played a significant role in Thai politics, even taking control through coups on multiple occasions. Despite not formally being in power at the time of the crisis, it continues to exert influence over the government and key institutions. Former Leader of the now-defunct Move Forward Party, Pita Limjaroenrat, stated in a recent interview: 'Thai politics is deadlocked by design. It was organized by the military junta to ensure that the constitution includes mechanisms for changing the election outcome. That happened to me and it's what's hitting her as well.'

Senior Fellow Joshua Kurlantzick wrote for the Council on Foreign Relations: 'Angering the military is never a good idea in Thailand. A military that feels greater strength, a weak civilian leader, and a surge of nationalism raises the real fear of a coup, in a country infamous for them.' This analysis would prove prescient as events unfolded in the weeks following the leaked phone call.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-military-s-role-in-thai-politics" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="political-crisis-and-the-prime-minister-s-suspension" -->
## Political Crisis and the Prime Minister's Suspension

After the call was leaked, Shinawatra, who became the country's youngest-ever Prime Minister in August 2024, was accused of being too politically naive to protect the country's national interests. She later issued an apology, claiming: 'I had no intent to do it for my own interest. I only thought about how to avoid chaos, avoid fighting, and to avoid loss of lives.' Unfortunately for her political career, the rabbit of inflamed nationalist opinion was very much out of the hat, and it was going to take more than an apologetic carrot to lure it back in.

By the end of June, there were mass protests on the streets of Bangkok, demanding Shinawatra's resignation. The protests were the largest seen since the ruling Pheu Thai party came to power in 2023. The people wanted a leader who could confront the Cambodian border crisis with resolve—not fold under the pressure. Then, on July 1st, Thailand's Constitutional Court voted by seven votes to two to suspend the PM following a petition from 36 senators, who alleged dishonesty and a breach of ethical standards. The court was expected to take 45 to 60 days to reach a verdict from the day she was suspended, although events since then have obviously overtaken the process.

<!-- aeo:section end="political-crisis-and-the-prime-minister-s-suspension" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="economic-pressures-and-weak-leadership-on-both-sides" -->
## Economic Pressures and Weak Leadership on Both Sides

In a different world, a domestic political crisis like this might have provided enough distraction from the issue of the border to allow for some behind-the-scenes de-escalation. After all, both Bangkok and Phnom Penh had plenty of other concerns demanding attention. Thailand was suffering from a weak government with a fragile majority in the House of Representatives, just as sluggish investment, limited productivity growth, and US tariff concerns took their toll. Even before she was suspended, research by the National Institute of Development Administration showed Shinawatra was polling well with just 9.2% of people.

Across the border, Cambodia's woes were, if anything, even worse. As the BBC's correspondent wrote: 'In Cambodia you've got an economy that is really struggling. You have a Prime Minister who is the son of a former strongman and does not yet really have his own authority and you have in Hun Sen, his father, a man who appears willing to push this conflict further in order to burnish his own nationalist credentials.' Yet despite—or perhaps because of—these problems, both sides seemed more interested in escalation than backing down.

<!-- aeo:section end="economic-pressures-and-weak-leadership-on-both-sides" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="cambodia-s-conscription-announcement" -->
## Cambodia's Conscription Announcement

On July 14th, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet announced that his country would implement military conscription in 2026. The Military Conscription Law, which was approved in 2006 but never enforced, requires Cambodians aged 18 to 30 to serve for 24 months. This announcement represented a significant escalation in rhetoric and preparation for potential conflict.

From a purely material standpoint, Phnom Penh was probably unwise to raise tensions in this manner. Thailand has overwhelming military strength relative to Cambodia. This massive disparity in military capability is one reason why a serious war has never erupted over Preah Vihear before. Indeed, before the shooting incident on May 28th, diplomatic relations between the two nations were even warming, suggesting that rational calculations of military balance had historically served as a brake on escalation.

<!-- aeo:section end="cambodia-s-conscription-announcement" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="thursday-s-escalation-artillery-and-airstrikes" -->
## Thursday's Escalation: Artillery and Airstrikes

Then came Thursday, July 24th, and all common sense seemed to go out the window. Beyond simple gunfire between army units, the conflict expanded into heavy shelling, including of civilian areas. At the time of recording, it was impossible to say for certain which side fired first, with each nation predictably blaming the other.

What can be established is that this all kicked off when a landmine exploded and injured five Thai soldiers on Wednesday. Bangkok responded by sealing the border that same night. By morning, clashes had again erupted around the temple at Preah Vihear. This time, though, the fighting didn't stay contained to military-on-military engagements.

According to Thai media, Cambodia's army shelled the Phanom Dong Rak Hospital, causing casualties, while civilians were also killed when Cambodian artillery struck a Thai gas station. By shortly before 3pm local time, Thailand was reporting that eleven civilians had been killed across three different provinces—including an eight-year-old boy—with up to 40,000 people evacuated from border areas. For its part, Cambodia had yet to release casualty figures by the time production began on this analysis.

<!-- aeo:section end="thursday-s-escalation-artillery-and-airstrikes" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="thai-air-power-enters-the-fight" -->
## Thai Air Power Enters the Fight

The conflict took on a new dimension when Thai F-16s bombed the 8th and 9th Infantry Divisions of the Royal Cambodian Army. This represented a significant escalation beyond artillery exchanges and ground combat, demonstrating Thailand's willingness to employ its substantial air superiority in the conflict. Prime Minister Hun Manet declared: 'Cambodia has always taken a stand to solve problems peacefully, but in this case we have no choice but to respond with armed forces against armed aggression.'

The use of fighter jets to bomb neighboring military positions, combined with the unrestrained use of artillery on civilian areas, seemed well beyond anything observers might have expected even a few days prior. The civilian death toll at the time of recording was already approaching that seen during the 2011 clashes and may have exceeded it subsequently.

<!-- aeo:section end="thai-air-power-enters-the-fight" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-military-balance-and-strategic-calculations" -->
## The Military Balance and Strategic Calculations

The power imbalance between Bangkok and Phnom Penh isn't some minor factor that Cambodia can hand wave away. Thailand's air force is operating 35 F-16s among other combat aircraft, while Cambodia can muster a mere 21 helicopters. Were this to escalate into a full-blown conflict, the disparity would be overwhelming—comparable to a mismatched boxing bout with a predetermined outcome.

This raises the question of why Cambodia would allow tensions to escalate to this point given its obvious military disadvantage. The answer likely lies in the domestic political dynamics on both sides, where nationalist sentiment and the need to appear strong have overridden rational strategic calculations. For Hun Sen, the former leader still wielding significant influence, pushing the conflict may serve to burnish nationalist credentials and distract from economic struggles. For Thailand's military, the opportunity to teach Cambodia a lesson and potentially reclaim disputed territory may have proven too tempting to resist, especially with a suspended civilian leader unable to effectively restrain military action.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-military-balance-and-strategic-calculations" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="regional-diplomacy-and-asean-s-limited-role" -->
## Regional Diplomacy and ASEAN's Limited Role

Beyond the bilateral military balance, there's the wider diplomatic angle to consider. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) exists in part to stop war from breaking out among its member states. In theory, regional heavy hitters should now step in and attempt to put out the fire before it spreads further.

However, it's an open question how effective ASEAN can be in this crisis. The body lacks an effective dispute resolution mechanism and has utterly failed to calm the ongoing fighting in Myanmar's civil war, raising doubts about its ability to mediate between Thailand and Cambodia. The organization's principle of non-interference in member states' internal affairs, while designed to maintain regional harmony, can also limit its effectiveness in resolving conflicts once they erupt.

<!-- aeo:section end="regional-diplomacy-and-asean-s-limited-role" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="the-leadership-vacuum-and-prospects-for-escalation" -->
## The Leadership Vacuum and Prospects for Escalation

The unknown factor in determining whether this conflict will escalate further or de-escalate is how the lack of effective leadership in both societies might affect things in the coming hours and days. Thailand has a weak government and a strong military that wants to retake the land around Preah Vihear and teach Cambodia a lesson. Cambodia, meanwhile, faces its own governance challenges, with its foreign policy apparently driven by a stubborn former leader happy to inflame nationalism to maintain popularity at home.

Already, the consequences of this leadership vacuum are visible. The civilian death toll at the time of recording was already approaching that seen in 2011 and may have exceeded it subsequently. The unrestrained use of artillery on civilian areas and fighter jets bombarding a neighbor seem well beyond anything observers might have expected even a few days prior to Thursday's escalation.

<!-- aeo:section end="the-leadership-vacuum-and-prospects-for-escalation" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="a-grim-reminder-of-changing-international-norms" -->
## A Grim Reminder of Changing International Norms

There are many reasons to believe de-escalation remains the most likely option. The massive military imbalance favors a quick Thai victory if the conflict continues, which may encourage Cambodia to seek a face-saving exit. Regional diplomatic pressure through ASEAN and other channels will likely intensify. Both countries face serious economic challenges that would only be exacerbated by prolonged conflict. And the historical pattern has been for these border disputes to flare up briefly before being tamped down through diplomatic channels.

However, even if tensions are dramatically dialed down in the coming days, Thursday's events serve as a stark reminder that we live in unusual times. There seems to be a growing tendency for states to resort to force far quicker than they would have done in the recent past. The year 2025 appears to be turning all sorts of simmering disputes—such as between Iran and Israel, or India and Pakistan—into sharp, sudden wars.

This may turn out to be just another skirmish in the long history of the Preah Vihear dispute, or it may turn out to be the start of something more significant. Either way, there's no denying that the world today is just that little bit more grim and tragic than it was 24 hours prior. The ease with which historical grievances, nationalist sentiment, and political weakness can combine to produce armed conflict between neighbors serves as a sobering lesson about the fragility of peace, even in regions that have enjoyed relative stability for decades.

<!-- aeo:section end="a-grim-reminder-of-changing-international-norms" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="related-coverage" -->
## Related Coverage
- [The UAE is Destabilizing the Entire Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/conflicts/the-uae-is-destabilizing-the-entire-middle-east)
- [How the UAE's Regional Meddling Triggered a Historic Realignment Across the Middle East](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-destabilizing-middle-east-regional-realignment-2026)
- [The UAE's Regional Ambitions Collapse as Middle East Powers Push Back](https://warfronts.pub/geopolitics/uae-regional-ambitions-collapse-middle-east-pushback)

<!-- aeo:section end="related-coverage" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="frequently-asked-questions" -->
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What triggered the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict in 2025?

On May 28th, 2025, Thai and Cambodian patrols encountered each other in the disputed Emerald Triangle region and opened fire in a ten-minute skirmish that killed one Cambodian soldier. Both sides claimed self-defense. Rather than de-escalating through diplomacy as in past incidents, the encounter spiraled due to nationalist sentiment, tit-for-tat economic measures, a leaked phone call, and a political crisis in Thailand.

### What is the Preah Vihear temple dispute about?

The dispute centers on the ancient Preah Vihear temple and 4.6 square kilometers of surrounding land in the Dangrek mountain range. The territory was ceded to France under the 1907 Franco-Siamese Treaty and later became part of Cambodia. The International Court of Justice ruled in 1962 that the temple belongs to Cambodia and in 2013 that the surrounding land does as well. Thailand accepts the temple is Cambodian but rejects the ICJ's authority over the surrounding territory and continues to claim it.

### What was the leaked phone call and why did it matter?

A phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was published in full by Hun Sen after an initial clip was leaked. In the call, Shinawatra took a deferential tone, addressed Hun Sen as 'uncle,' promised to 'take care' of anything he wanted, and criticized a Thai military commander for wanting to 'look tough.' Publicly criticizing the Thai military is considered a major taboo in Thailand, where the armed forces are deeply linked to the monarchy. The call inflamed nationalist sentiment, triggered mass protests, and contributed to her suspension by the Constitutional Court.

### What happened on July 24th, 2025?

After a landmine injured five Thai soldiers on Wednesday July 23rd, Bangkok sealed the border. By Thursday morning, clashes erupted around Preah Vihear and expanded into heavy shelling of civilian areas. Thai media reported that Cambodia's army shelled the Phanom Dong Rak Hospital and a gas station, killing eleven Thai civilians across three provinces, including an eight-year-old boy. Up to 40,000 people were evacuated. Thai F-16s bombed the 8th and 9th Infantry Divisions of the Royal Cambodian Army, marking a significant escalation.

### How do the military capabilities of Thailand and Cambodia compare, and why did Cambodia allow tensions to escalate anyway?

Thailand has overwhelming military superiority, operating 35 F-16s among other combat aircraft while Cambodia can muster only 21 helicopters. This disparity had historically served as a brake on escalation. The most likely explanation for Cambodia's willingness to push the conflict is domestic politics: former leader Hun Sen appeared willing to inflame nationalism to maintain his influence and distract from Cambodia's struggling economy, even though a full-scale war would almost certainly end in a devastating Cambodian defeat.

<!-- aeo:section end="frequently-asked-questions" -->
<!-- aeo:section start="sources" -->
## Sources
- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3038380/army-chiefs-try-to-resolve-thai-cambodian-border-dispute>
- <https://asianews.network/thai-cambodian-army-chiefs-agree-to-resolve-border-dispute-through-joint-committee/#:~:text=The%20Nation,concluding%20with%20the%20following%20agreements:>
- <https://www.reuters.com/world/china/thailand-cambodia-reinforcing-troops-disputed-border-after-may-skirmish-thai-2025-06-07/>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/03/thailand-cambodia-leaked-phone-call-shinawatra-dynasty-paetongtarn>
- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/16/thailands-ruling-coalition-nominates-paetongtarn-as-pm-parliament-to-vote>
- <https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/southeast-asia/thailand-pm-paetongtarn-resign-cambodia-leaked-phone-call-b2773098.html>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/20/thai-prime-minister-paetongtarn-shinawatra-apologises-phone-leak-crisis-cambodia-hun-sen>
- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9vrrj72xy7o>
- <https://news.sky.com/story/thai-pm-paetongtarn-shinawatra-suspended-amid-outrage-over-leaked-phone-call-13390861>
- <https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/thai-protesters-call-prime-minister-paetongtarns-resignation-2025-06-28/>
- <https://www.nationthailand.com/blogs/news/politics/40052519>
- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3060108/pm-paetongtarns-popularity-plummets-in-thai-opinion-poll>
- <https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/asean/suspended-thai-pm-asks-court-more-time-respond-ethics-case>
- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3068932/national-anti-corruption-commission-takes-up-pms-phone-call-case>
- <https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20250715_20/>
- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27292633>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/07/thai-court-orders-yingluck-shinawatra-resign>
- <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-41410047>
- <https://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/28/asia/yingluck-shinawatra-asylum>
- <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/1/thailand-pm-paetongtarn-shinawatra-father-thaksin-face-legal-peril>
- <https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/07/16/asia-pacific/thaksin-defamation-court/>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/17/former-thai-pm-thaksin-shinawatra-about-to-be-released-on-parole>
- <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/24/thailand-army-closes-cambodia-border-crossings-as-territorial-tensions-escalate-paetongtarn-shinawatra-hun-sen#:~:text=The%20latest%20border%20closures%20follow,for%20visitors%20from%20either%20country>
- <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Khmer-Rouge>
- <https://www.nytimes.com/1985/03/07/world/thai-forces-clash-with-vietnam.html#:~:text=Thai%20troops%20and%20aircraft%20attacked%20Vietnamese%20forces,to%20surround%20the%20last%20major%20Cambodian%20resistance>
- <https://en.news.un.org/en/story/2013/11/455062>
- <https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/3042720/asean>
- <https://www.cfr.org/blog/thailand-cambodia-border-conflict-causing-havoc-southeast-asia-and-worries-another-thai-coup>
- <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/17/thailand-cambodia-border-disputeasean-hun-manet-paetongtarn/>
- <https://monocle.com/affairs/thailand-politics-prime-minister-resignation-protests/>
- <https://khmer.voanews.com/a/thailand-withdraws-from-world-heritage-convention-in-temple-dispute-with-cambodia-124589479/1358343.html>

&lt;!-- youtube:EcSI9Tx6cRs --&gt;
<!-- aeo:section end="sources" -->