--- title: "Ukraine, Guardian of the Gulf: How Kyiv Became the Middle East's Drone-Defense Lifeline" description: "For most of the world, the Iran War of 2026 was a rude awakening to the realities of modern conflict. In late March, the New York Times reported that several American military bases in the Middle East had been struck so extensively they were \"all but uninhabitable.\" Oil refineries and fields across the region, and a critical liquefied natural gas facility in Qatar, were devastated in waves of Iranian drone and ballistic missile attacks. Iran hit radar installations, hotels, and high-rise buildings, threatened targets as far away as the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, and even destroyed one of only a tiny handful of deployable copies of America's E-3 Sentry, one of the most important military aircraft on Earth.\n\nAcross the Middle East, air defenses intercepted the vast majority of incoming attacks. But when an adversary can launch dozens or even hundreds of projectiles at a time, intercepting the vast majority simply is not enough. The math of saturation is unforgiving, and the Gulf states learned it the hard way.\n\nA small handful of nations had absorbed these lessons before everyone else. And the undisputed world leader in modern drone warfare just so happened to be willing to share its secrets for the right price. That nation is Ukraine, and through the worst of the conflict it worked overtime to provide protection to the Middle East wherever it could. For Kyiv, the partnership carried a real cost: its drone operators and air-defense experts are desperately needed on its own front lines, where Russia was pressing a creeping spring offensive.\n\nBut if Ukraine can pull this off, enhancing Gulf security while holding the Russians at the front, the rewards could be extraordinary for all sides. The thesis is simple and audacious: Ukraine has turned the catastrophe of someone else's war into a strategic opportunity to advance its own.\n\n## Key Takeaways\n\n- The Iran War of 2026 overwhelmed Gulf air defenses, with the UAE alone destroying 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones in just the first ten days of the conflict.\n- Iran's strategy relied on cheap, mass-produced ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and long-range kamikaze drones to overwhelm far more expensive interceptor systems, an asymmetry that favored the attacker.\n- A single Iranian Shahed-136 drone costs roughly $50,000 to build, while a US Patriot interceptor missile costs over $4 million, a cost disparity that becomes ruinous when Iran launches thousands of projectiles.\n- Ukraine, the world's most experienced practitioner of attritional drone warfare, deployed 201 anti-drone specialists to the Gulf and offered surplus interceptor production capacity, producing at least 2,000 interceptor drones per day while needing only half that for its own defense.\n- President Zelenskyy signed defense agreements with Saudi Arabia (a ten-year pact), Qatar, and the UAE in late March 2026, with talks underway with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman by early April.\n- In exchange, Ukraine receives crude oil, processed diesel, direct cash payments, select interceptors, and crucially, Gulf investment to build new production lines Kyiv will keep long after the orders are filled.\n- The deals simultaneously batter Russian interests by distancing the Gulf from Moscow, weakening Iran, and positioning Ukraine as the premier post-war arms exporter.\n\n## The Splintered Shield\n\nTo understand the solution Ukraine is offering the nations of the Persian Gulf, we have to start with the problem they faced. In a word, that problem is air defense.\n\nIran is not a nation with much traditional offensive capability. Even before the 2026 conflict, Iran's ground forces could not project power beyond the countries with which it shares a land border. It lacked strategic bombers and an air force capable of gaining air superiority against any modern adversary, and its navy was largely an afterthought. Instead, Iran relied on a combination of high-arcing ballistic missiles, maneuverable cruise missiles, and long-range kamikaze drones.\n\nIts practical limitations went beyond the variety of its arsenal. The missiles and drones Iran possessed also lacked range, certainly the range to strike the United States itself. So when Washington came to the Persian Gulf this year to assert dominance over Tehran, the Iranian regime responded by targeting any nearby nation that was both within range and valuable to the United States and Israel.\n\nThe Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and others, took the brunt of the attacks. The strikes focused mostly on their ability to extract energy resources like oil and natural gas, process them, and export them across the globe. These nations understood the value of those assets long before the war and warned Washington urgently of the risk. The United States either was not convinced or was not concerned. When the war began, those warnings were proven entirely accurate.\n\n## Why the Interceptors Could Not Keep Up\n\nTo prepare, the nations of the region had stockpiled a variety of air defense systems to shoot down incoming drones and missiles. In the weeks before war broke out, the United States complemented those defenses with additional systems flown in from across the globe, and concentrated air defenses across more than a dozen of its own bases in the region, several close to major urban centers or economic targets.\n\nThe deployed systems are all very good at what they do, but they suffer from several limitations at once. First, different systems are built for different threats: a system designed to intercept ballistic missiles cannot deal with low-flying drones, and vice versa. Second, air defense is costly, and much more costly than the drones and missiles Iran relied on. Iran might spend roughly $50,000 to produce a copy of its highly effective Shahed-136 drone, but if an American Patriot battery locks on and shoots it down, even successfully, that interceptor missile costs the US or its allies over $4 million. The US and the Gulf states are far wealthier than Iran, and in a limited conflict that disparity might be tolerable. When Iran launches thousands of missiles and drones, it is a different story entirely.\n\nThe third problem comes from the drones themselves. They are not exactly stealthy, but they carry limited stealthy features that make them harder to detect, and they fly at far lower speeds and altitudes than missile interceptors are built to engage. That makes them harder to positively identify as threats, and easier to slip through air defenses under the right conditions, especially in swarm attacks.\n\nThe fourth problem is magazine depth. Every system is limited by the number of interceptors it can launch before reloading. If a Patriot battery carries thirty-two PAC-2 interceptors but faces a swarm of forty incoming drones, then even with perfect accuracy, eight drones still get through, simply because the battery cannot be reloaded fast enough.\n\n## A Critical Shortage\n\nEven worse, interceptors began running out quickly once the conflict started in earnest. The volume of incoming fire was staggering. Interception counts from just the first ten days showed the United Arab Emirates had destroyed 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones, a single country, across less than a third of the conflict's total duration.\n\nThere are only so many interceptors available across the globe, and they can be produced only so quickly. America's best Patriot interceptors, the PAC-3, were being produced at a rate of 600 per year when the conflict began, and America's high-altitude ballistic missile interceptor, the THAAD, at roughly 96 per year. Those numbers can be raised substantially over time, and the US has already made the investments to scale up. But standing up new production lines takes months, and replenishing stockpiles while accounting for new demand takes years.\n\nBy mid-March, Gulf states were already telling Washington they had to pick and choose which targets to intercept, to avoid running out completely. The US had to pull interceptors from Europe, the Indo-Pacific, and deep within its own reserves just to keep pace with the volume coming from Iran. By the end of the conflict, reports from America, Israel, and several Gulf states indicated the problem had gone critical.\n\n## Ukraine to the Rescue\n\nIn ordinary times, it would have been extraordinarily unlikely that the Gulf states would turn to an alternative arms dealer for bulk orders of new weaponry. The oil-rich countries of the Arabian Peninsula are among Washington's most faithful customers, and some of its best-paying. But the destruction of the Iran War was far from ordinary, and within weeks of the conflict's start, Middle Eastern leaders had begun reaching out to one Volodymyr Zelenskyy.\n\nMore than any other nation on Earth, including the United States, Ukraine has developed an extraordinary ability to fight long-range, attritional drone-and-missile warfare. In its war with Russia, it has fought in an environment where the skies are simply too dangerous for manned aircraft on either side, and where drone technology has filled the gap. Lacking the military budget of a major economy even with foreign assistance, Ukraine has had to find low-cost solutions to a wide range of problems, and in most cases drones have been the answer.\n\nUkrainian drones are, far and away, the best in the world, prized both for the incredible range of designs Kyiv has produced and for the rapid design-and-redesign process that has kept Ukraine at the bleeding edge of adaptation. On offense, its drones provide real-time, constant monitoring of a vast front line, launching strikes and conducting kamikaze attacks in networked swarms. But Ukraine has also adapted drones into a dedicated air-defense role, developing nimble interceptors that can knock out incoming adversary drones as they approach.\n\n## A Perfect Match\n\nThere was a reason Ukraine's expertise fit the Gulf's needs so precisely. Because Russia relies so heavily on drone designs adapted from Iranian base models, Ukraine is highly experienced in dealing with exactly the sort of drones Iran was launching toward the Gulf states. Its drone operators are immensely experienced in using those drones in fast-paced, full-scale conflict. In short, Ukrainian drone technology was precisely what the Gulf states needed to fill the gaps in the air-defense support Washington could provide.\n\nThe larger question, at least early on, was whether Ukraine would surrender its hard-won technology while it still had its own war to fight. Kyiv has banned the export of its defense equipment, its designs, and its component technology for years, to ensure all its resources stayed concentrated on Russia. Ukraine has very little money to spare, even less manpower on the home front, and next to zero capacity to send its best drone or air-defense experts away from the front lines.\n\nYet despite those shortages, Kyiv announced on the eighteenth of March that it had deployed 201 anti-drone experts to the Middle East to assist partner governments across the Persian Gulf. Dozens more were already prepared to travel and have since been sent. According to Zelenskyy, the operators were dispatched in teams to the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and several other nations.\n\nNot only that, but Zelenskyy revealed that Ukraine had already developed excess production capacity specifically for drone interceptors. As of mid-March, by his own estimate, Ukraine could produce a minimum of 2,000 interceptor drones each day, but needed only half that number to defend itself. As he put it: \"If a Shahed needs to be stopped in the Emirates, we can do it. If it needs to be stopped in Europe or the United Kingdom, we can do it.\"\n\n## Drone Diplomacy on Tour\n\nBy the end of that month, Zelenskyy had traveled across the Middle East to formalize arrangements for Ukraine to do exactly that.\n\nIn Saudi Arabia, he met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and worked out a ten-year defense agreement allowing Ukraine to exchange technology and expertise, paving the way for substantial investment and a framework for future contracts. In Qatar, Zelenskyy signed a partnership for \"collaboration in technological fields, development of joint projects, defense investments and the exchange of expertise in countering missiles and unmanned aerial systems.\" As with the Saudis, Qatar's collaboration would focus mainly on instruction and technology-sharing to counter missiles and unmanned systems. The United Arab Emirates followed with a similar agreement shortly after.\n\nIn each case, many details were not disclosed and others were left intentionally ambiguous, but Ukraine is known to be weighing the prospect of building production lines on the soil of its Middle Eastern partners. By early April, Kyiv was in talks with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman over similar cooperative arrangements.\n\nAll of this unfolded despite the rumored frustration of the United States, where defense officials were reportedly upset with the Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia, for pursuing agreements outside their relationships with Washington. Yet, as the Saudi Crown Prince purportedly reminded the United States, its defense decisions are a matter of Saudi national interest. For Riyadh and the other Gulf capitals, that interest dictated pursuing any arrangement that could stop the attacks coming their way.\n\n## Reciprocal Benefit\n\nFor the Gulf states, the advantages of partnering with Ukraine are obvious. Kyiv possesses technical knowledge, operational experience, and a purpose-built anti-drone arsenal that the United States and other nations cannot match. For Ukraine, the rationale is less obvious, given that it has its own war to fight. Yet its decision is driven by a clear strategic calculus, not merely to build goodwill or generate good press, but to bring Ukraine closer to its own victory over Russia.\n\nFirst come the practical payoffs, including direct compensation. Supporting the Gulf states is far from charity, and the Gulf states know it. They have been more than happy to agree to resource deals in exchange for Ukraine's assistance. According to Zelenskyy, Ukraine will receive direct supplies of crude oil to be processed in Europe, as well as the processed diesel fuel it needs urgently. In other cases, Kyiv will receive direct cash payments to spend as it sees fit in support of the war effort. Zelenskyy has also indicated the Gulf states may send types of air-defense interceptors less useful against Iran but more useful to Ukraine in defending its energy infrastructure.\n\nJust as important as the payments are the infusions Gulf capitals are providing for Ukraine's defense industry. By Ukraine's own admission, the country could be producing double the volume of military hardware it currently manufactures, but lacks the funds to do so. At first the Gulf states will receive hardware already built or set aside from current production lines. After that, they will help create new production lines that Ukraine will still have access to, long after the Gulf orders are filled.\n\n## The Strategic Dividend\n\nThese deals are also critical to Ukraine for strategic reasons. None of the Gulf states is a military powerhouse, but they are hardly irrelevant on the global stage. They are immensely wealthy, supply a high share of the world's energy needs, and wield broad influence. Right now Ukraine has only a handful of consistent advocates on the world stage, concentrated mostly in Europe, while a wide range of other nations are either partial to Russia or interested in preserving their place on the sidelines. Even countries that were once much closer to Ukraine, like the United States, have grown more distant.\n\nIf Ukraine can make good on its new arrangements, it will be able to count on Gulf influence to advance its causes and pressure other countries to work more closely with Kyiv. This is not simply goodwill. If Ukraine helps keep the Gulf states safe, then it is in their interest that Ukraine remains safe, stable, and free to produce the defense equipment they are counting on. The Gulf states need to do business with Ukraine, and the Russian invasion is clearly getting in the way.\n\nThen there are all the ways these deals hurt Russian interests as much as they help Ukraine's. The Gulf states' postures toward Russia and Ukraine are mutually exclusive: drawing closer to Ukraine necessarily means drifting further from Moscow. The Gulf states are very important to Russia as an enduring trade partner, a guardian of Russian offshore finance, a tourism and investment destination, and a broker of Russian relations with the rest of the world. Those relationships cannot continue as normal if the Gulf forms deeper ties with the country Russia is trying to invade.\n\n## Brothers in Hatred, Brothers in Weapons\n\nA better Gulf military response to Iran is also a way for Ukraine to batter one of Russia's closest allies. Moscow has supported Tehran's war effort, built up its military, propped up its economy, and helped it skirt sanctions for years. Russia has relied heavily on Iranian drone designs to continue its war with Ukraine, but today Iran relies just as much on Russian components to build its drones faster and cheaper than it otherwise could. As Zelenskyy framed it in March: \"The regimes in Russia and Iran are brothers in hatred, and that is why they are brothers in weapons. And we want regimes built on hatred to never win, in anything.\"\n\nEqually important, Ukraine is helping the Gulf states find ways to support Kyiv without taking a hard stance against Russia that might backfire. When Gulf states agree to supply Ukraine with cash rather than trade military hardware, that is no accident. Providing weapons directly would create immense friction with Russia, a relationship Gulf nations are not necessarily fond of, but one they would be very hesitant to blow up completely. Handing over money is different. The Gulf states know the cash will probably support Ukraine's war effort, directly or indirectly, but once it is transferred, they can wash their hands of the matter. Russia is welcome to start an argument over those payments, but if it did, Gulf states might be inclined to reconsider other deliberately ambiguous arrangements, including ones that benefit Russia.\n\n## From Aid Recipient to Arms Exporter\n\nFinally, these early agreements are an ideal way for Ukraine to begin its path toward becoming a post-war arms exporter. When Ukraine's war with Russia eventually ends, Kyiv will be the premier source of modern drones, and other countries will be eager for its help in rethinking how they build production lines, adapt technology in real time, and cope with the constantly changing nature of the modern battlefield.\n\nThe Gulf states' eagerness has already set a helpful precedent, with other countries engaging more openly around post-war arms agreements than before. In mid-April, Germany began work with Ukraine on plans to jointly produce advanced drones and other systems, with the apparent intent to cover a very wide range of drone and missile technology. Ukraine has also agreed to increase security cooperation with Syria, an unexpected partnership expected to bring Kyiv into far closer alignment with Syria's primary sponsor, Turkey. On the home front, Ukrainian startups are pivoting toward international demand, with Fire Point, designer of Ukraine's Flamingo cruise missile, now looking to create a new, cheap air defense system as soon as next year.\n\nThe situation Ukraine faces is one it never asked for. It is under invasion by a much larger, more militarily powerful, and more economically potent adversary, one that appears hell-bent on erasing Ukraine from existence no matter the cost. But across several years of continuous conflict, Ukraine has proven able to adapt, again and again, to make the most of a painful and dangerous set of circumstances. For most of the world, the war in the Middle East has meant instability, energy shocks, and horror at the bloodshed across an entire region, and Ukraine has felt all those problems too. Yet Ukraine has turned the Iran conflict into an opportunity. As long as it can hold its current course, it will emerge from these chaotic months in a stronger position than ever before.\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n### Why were the Gulf states' air defenses unable to stop Iran's attacks?\n\nSeveral limitations compounded at once. Different systems are built for different threats, so a system designed to intercept ballistic missiles cannot stop low-flying drones and vice versa. Interceptors are far more expensive than the projectiles they shoot down: Iran's Shahed-136 drone costs roughly $50,000 to build while a single US Patriot interceptor costs over $4 million. And every battery can launch only so many interceptors before reloading, so a large enough swarm guarantees some leakage even with perfect accuracy.\n\n### How severe was the interceptor shortage, and how did Ukraine fit in?\n\nIn just the first ten days of the conflict, the UAE alone destroyed 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones. With PAC-3 interceptors produced at only about 600 per year and THAAD at roughly 96, the US had to pull stockpiles from Europe and the Indo-Pacific. By mid-March, Gulf states were choosing which targets to intercept to avoid running out entirely. Ukraine, meanwhile, could produce at least 2,000 interceptor drones per day and needed only half that for its own defense, making it the most immediately available surplus supplier in the world.\n\n### What exactly did Ukraine provide to the Gulf states, and what did it receive in return?\n\nUkraine deployed 201 anti-drone specialists to the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and others, with dozens more to follow, offering instruction, technology-sharing, and expertise in countering drones specifically adapted from Iranian base models. In return, Kyiv received direct crude oil supplies for processing in Europe, urgently needed diesel fuel, direct cash payments, and certain air-defense interceptors. Crucially, Gulf capitals also funded new production lines that Ukraine will retain access to long after Gulf orders are filled.\n\n### Which defense agreements did Zelenskyy sign, and with whom?\n\nZelenskyy signed a ten-year defense agreement with Saudi Arabia covering technology exchange and defense investment, a partnership with Qatar for collaboration in technological fields and countering missiles and unmanned systems, and a similar agreement with the United Arab Emirates. By early April 2026, Ukraine was also in talks with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman over comparable cooperative arrangements.\n\n### How do these deals damage Russian interests?\n\nThe deals pull the Gulf states away from Moscow, which relies on them as an enduring trade partner, offshore finance guardian, and diplomatic broker. They also strengthen the Gulf response against Iran, one of Russia's closest allies, which depends on Russian components to build its drones just as Russia depends on Iranian drone designs. And because the Gulf states are transferring cash rather than weapons directly, they support Ukraine's war effort while leaving Russia little leverage to object without jeopardizing its own ambiguous arrangements with those same governments.\n\n## Related Coverage\n\n- [All the Ways the US Could Intervene in Iran](/articles/geopolitics/all-the-ways-the-us-could-intervene-in-iran)\n- [America and Israel Attack Iran: Operation Epic Fury](/articles/geopolitics/america-israel-attack-iran-operation-epic-fury)\n\n## Sources\n\n1. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2r4wxdw3no\n2. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/27/ukraine-announces-defense-pact-with-saudi-arabia\n3. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-28/ukraine-saudi-arabia-agree-to-share-drone-and-missile-expertise/106505792\n4. https://jamestown.org/ukraine-saudi-arabia-defense-agreement-highlights-demand-for-battle-tested-expertise/\n5. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/18/over-200-ukrainian-military-experts-in-gulf-region-to-counter-irans-drones\n6. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-saudi-arabia-sign-deal-defence-cooperation-zelenskiy-says-2026-03-27/\n7. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/03/ukraine-inks-defense-agreements-with-qatar-and-saudi-arabia-with-uae-to-follow/\n8. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/ukraine-uae-agree-cooperate-defence-zelenskiy-says-2026-03-28/\n9. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/28/zelenskyy-signs-air-defence-deals-with-uae-qatar-on-gulf-tour\n10. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/03/28/ukraines-zelenskyy-agrees-to-defense-cooperation-with-uae-qatar/\n11. https://www.france24.com/en/ukraine-uae-seal-defence-deal-kyiv-s-know-how-and-equipment-gain-recognition\n12. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-war-middle-east-news-updates/card/ukraine-agrees-to-10-year-defense-cooperation-with-gulf-countries-IETFUeY4WMDrqEA935jY\n13. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/ukraine-talks-with-oman-kuwait-bahrain-security-cooperation-zelenskiy-says-2026-04-10/\n14. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/73696\n15. https://www.eenews.net/articles/ukraine-secures-oil-lifeline-from-gulf-states-in-exchange-for-military-aid/\n16. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy-secures-oil-lifeline-gulf-states-military-support/\n17. https://www.euronews.com/2026/04/10/ukrainians-shot-down-irans-drones-in-the-gulf-what-does-kyiv-get-in-return\n18. https://www.euractiv.com/news/ukraine-opens-defence-expertise-export-in-middle-east-security-deals/\n19. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-continues-remarkable-rise-from-aid-recipient-to-security-provider/\n20. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2026/02/arab-world-russia-support\n21. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/russias-closer-ties-with-gulf-deliver-an-arabic-speaking-tourism-boom-2026-02-27/\n22. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/zelenskiy-syria-meet-president-sharaa-sources-say-2026-04-05/\n23. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-missile-maker-targets-game-changer-air-defence-system-by-2027-2026-04-06/\n24. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy-warms-up-with-black-sea-strongman-turkiye/\n25. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/turkeysource/zelenskyys-middle-east-and-turkey-tour-reveals-a-new-regional-order-in-the-making/\n26. https://www.gmfus.org/news/iran-war-deals-ukraine-new-diplomatic-cards\n27. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/27/zelenskyy-saudi-visit-us-troops-middle-east-iran-ukraine-aid-shahed-drones.html\n28. https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/26/facing-european-cold-shoulder-ukraine-turns-to-middle-east-partners\n29. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-deepens-gulf-security-ties-kyiv-exports-air-defense-expertise-zelenskyy-united-arab-emirates/\n30. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/03/29/world/ukraine-gulf-arms-deals-focus/\n31. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20260328-zelensky-agrees-defence-cooperation-with-uae-qatar-on-gulf-tour\n32. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-deploys-228-specialists-middle-east-discussing-serious-agreements-2026-03-20/\n33. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20260329-zelensky-visits-jordan-on-middle-east-tour-to-bolster-security-ties\n34. https://www.wsj.com/world/the-middle-east-needs-to-learn-how-ukraine-stops-cheap-drones-ae1e36e2\n35. https://www.politico.eu/article/iran-war-shockwaves-force-saudi-arabia-to-strike-security-deal-with-ukraine/\n36. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/10/zelenskyy-says-ukrainian-interceptors-downed-iran-drones-in-the-middle-east\n37. https://cepa.org/article/zelenskyys-drone-diplomacy-wins-new-arab-friends/\n38. https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-drone-defense-playbook-maybe-ideal-middle-east-interceptors-2026-4\n39. https://www.newarab.com/analysis/why-gulf-states-turned-ukraine-defence-deals\n40. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-iran-shahed-drones-gulf-zelensky-b2955057.html\n41. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddq7j48p35o\n42. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-military-bases-gulf-useless-after-iranian-strikes-experts-say\n43. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/interceptor-shortage-could-force-gulf-states-selective-targets\n44. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10715958\n45. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2026/03/the-gulf-states-offensive-options-against-iran/\n46. https://www.economist.com/international/2026/03/13/gulf-states-are-burning-through-interceptors\n47. https://www.wsj.com/world/gulf-allies-turn-away-from-u-s-for-fresh-ammo-9960be73\n48. https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-are-unintended-consequences-us-iran-conflict-defense-and-security\n\n" url: https://warfronts.pub/article/ukraine-gulf-states-drone-air-defense-partnership.md canonical: https://warfronts.pub/article/ukraine-gulf-states-drone-air-defense-partnership datePublished: 2026-06-02 dateModified: 2026-06-02 author: - name: Simon Whistler url: https://warfronts.pub/author/simon-whistler publisher: Warfronts image: "https://media.warfronts.pub/cdn-cgi/image/width=1600,height=900,fit=cover,quality=80,format=auto/articles/eip1jHpeFbg/hero.jpg" type: NewsArticle contentHash: a501bbdde54b5c2c88007992be7d1cb751a0a9d37d0a86012f6a7a234e1d9939 tokens: 7195 summaryUrl: https://warfronts.pub/article/ukraine-gulf-states-drone-air-defense-partnership.md.summary.md --- For most of the world, the Iran War of 2026 was a rude awakening to the realities of modern conflict. In late March, the New York Times reported that several American military bases in the Middle East had been struck so extensively they were "all but uninhabitable." Oil refineries and fields across the region, and a critical liquefied natural gas facility in Qatar, were devastated in waves of Iranian drone and ballistic missile attacks. Iran hit radar installations, hotels, and high-rise buildings, threatened targets as far away as the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, and even destroyed one of only a tiny handful of deployable copies of America's E-3 Sentry, one of the most important military aircraft on Earth. Across the Middle East, air defenses intercepted the vast majority of incoming attacks. But when an adversary can launch dozens or even hundreds of projectiles at a time, intercepting the vast majority simply is not enough. The math of saturation is unforgiving, and the Gulf states learned it the hard way. A small handful of nations had absorbed these lessons before everyone else. And the undisputed world leader in modern drone warfare just so happened to be willing to share its secrets for the right price. That nation is Ukraine, and through the worst of the conflict it worked overtime to provide protection to the Middle East wherever it could. For Kyiv, the partnership carried a real cost: its drone operators and air-defense experts are desperately needed on its own front lines, where Russia was pressing a creeping spring offensive. But if Ukraine can pull this off, enhancing Gulf security while holding the Russians at the front, the rewards could be extraordinary for all sides. The thesis is simple and audacious: Ukraine has turned the catastrophe of someone else's war into a strategic opportunity to advance its own. ## Key Takeaways - The Iran War of 2026 overwhelmed Gulf air defenses, with the UAE alone destroying 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones in just the first ten days of the conflict. - Iran's strategy relied on cheap, mass-produced ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and long-range kamikaze drones to overwhelm far more expensive interceptor systems, an asymmetry that favored the attacker. - A single Iranian Shahed-136 drone costs roughly $50,000 to build, while a US Patriot interceptor missile costs over $4 million, a cost disparity that becomes ruinous when Iran launches thousands of projectiles. - Ukraine, the world's most experienced practitioner of attritional drone warfare, deployed 201 anti-drone specialists to the Gulf and offered surplus interceptor production capacity, producing at least 2,000 interceptor drones per day while needing only half that for its own defense. - President Zelenskyy signed defense agreements with Saudi Arabia (a ten-year pact), Qatar, and the UAE in late March 2026, with talks underway with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman by early April. - In exchange, Ukraine receives crude oil, processed diesel, direct cash payments, select interceptors, and crucially, Gulf investment to build new production lines Kyiv will keep long after the orders are filled. - The deals simultaneously batter Russian interests by distancing the Gulf from Moscow, weakening Iran, and positioning Ukraine as the premier post-war arms exporter. ## The Splintered Shield To understand the solution Ukraine is offering the nations of the Persian Gulf, we have to start with the problem they faced. In a word, that problem is air defense. Iran is not a nation with much traditional offensive capability. Even before the 2026 conflict, Iran's ground forces could not project power beyond the countries with which it shares a land border. It lacked strategic bombers and an air force capable of gaining air superiority against any modern adversary, and its navy was largely an afterthought. Instead, Iran relied on a combination of high-arcing ballistic missiles, maneuverable cruise missiles, and long-range kamikaze drones. Its practical limitations went beyond the variety of its arsenal. The missiles and drones Iran possessed also lacked range, certainly the range to strike the United States itself. So when Washington came to the Persian Gulf this year to assert dominance over Tehran, the Iranian regime responded by targeting any nearby nation that was both within range and valuable to the United States and Israel. The Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and others, took the brunt of the attacks. The strikes focused mostly on their ability to extract energy resources like oil and natural gas, process them, and export them across the globe. These nations understood the value of those assets long before the war and warned Washington urgently of the risk. The United States either was not convinced or was not concerned. When the war began, those warnings were proven entirely accurate. ## Why the Interceptors Could Not Keep Up To prepare, the nations of the region had stockpiled a variety of air defense systems to shoot down incoming drones and missiles. In the weeks before war broke out, the United States complemented those defenses with additional systems flown in from across the globe, and concentrated air defenses across more than a dozen of its own bases in the region, several close to major urban centers or economic targets. The deployed systems are all very good at what they do, but they suffer from several limitations at once. First, different systems are built for different threats: a system designed to intercept ballistic missiles cannot deal with low-flying drones, and vice versa. Second, air defense is costly, and much more costly than the drones and missiles Iran relied on. Iran might spend roughly $50,000 to produce a copy of its highly effective Shahed-136 drone, but if an American Patriot battery locks on and shoots it down, even successfully, that interceptor missile costs the US or its allies over $4 million. The US and the Gulf states are far wealthier than Iran, and in a limited conflict that disparity might be tolerable. When Iran launches thousands of missiles and drones, it is a different story entirely. The third problem comes from the drones themselves. They are not exactly stealthy, but they carry limited stealthy features that make them harder to detect, and they fly at far lower speeds and altitudes than missile interceptors are built to engage. That makes them harder to positively identify as threats, and easier to slip through air defenses under the right conditions, especially in swarm attacks. The fourth problem is magazine depth. Every system is limited by the number of interceptors it can launch before reloading. If a Patriot battery carries thirty-two PAC-2 interceptors but faces a swarm of forty incoming drones, then even with perfect accuracy, eight drones still get through, simply because the battery cannot be reloaded fast enough. ## A Critical Shortage Even worse, interceptors began running out quickly once the conflict started in earnest. The volume of incoming fire was staggering. Interception counts from just the first ten days showed the United Arab Emirates had destroyed 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones, a single country, across less than a third of the conflict's total duration. There are only so many interceptors available across the globe, and they can be produced only so quickly. America's best Patriot interceptors, the PAC-3, were being produced at a rate of 600 per year when the conflict began, and America's high-altitude ballistic missile interceptor, the THAAD, at roughly 96 per year. Those numbers can be raised substantially over time, and the US has already made the investments to scale up. But standing up new production lines takes months, and replenishing stockpiles while accounting for new demand takes years. By mid-March, Gulf states were already telling Washington they had to pick and choose which targets to intercept, to avoid running out completely. The US had to pull interceptors from Europe, the Indo-Pacific, and deep within its own reserves just to keep pace with the volume coming from Iran. By the end of the conflict, reports from America, Israel, and several Gulf states indicated the problem had gone critical. ## Ukraine to the Rescue In ordinary times, it would have been extraordinarily unlikely that the Gulf states would turn to an alternative arms dealer for bulk orders of new weaponry. The oil-rich countries of the Arabian Peninsula are among Washington's most faithful customers, and some of its best-paying. But the destruction of the Iran War was far from ordinary, and within weeks of the conflict's start, Middle Eastern leaders had begun reaching out to one Volodymyr Zelenskyy. More than any other nation on Earth, including the United States, Ukraine has developed an extraordinary ability to fight long-range, attritional drone-and-missile warfare. In its war with Russia, it has fought in an environment where the skies are simply too dangerous for manned aircraft on either side, and where drone technology has filled the gap. Lacking the military budget of a major economy even with foreign assistance, Ukraine has had to find low-cost solutions to a wide range of problems, and in most cases drones have been the answer. Ukrainian drones are, far and away, the best in the world, prized both for the incredible range of designs Kyiv has produced and for the rapid design-and-redesign process that has kept Ukraine at the bleeding edge of adaptation. On offense, its drones provide real-time, constant monitoring of a vast front line, launching strikes and conducting kamikaze attacks in networked swarms. But Ukraine has also adapted drones into a dedicated air-defense role, developing nimble interceptors that can knock out incoming adversary drones as they approach. ## A Perfect Match There was a reason Ukraine's expertise fit the Gulf's needs so precisely. Because Russia relies so heavily on drone designs adapted from Iranian base models, Ukraine is highly experienced in dealing with exactly the sort of drones Iran was launching toward the Gulf states. Its drone operators are immensely experienced in using those drones in fast-paced, full-scale conflict. In short, Ukrainian drone technology was precisely what the Gulf states needed to fill the gaps in the air-defense support Washington could provide. The larger question, at least early on, was whether Ukraine would surrender its hard-won technology while it still had its own war to fight. Kyiv has banned the export of its defense equipment, its designs, and its component technology for years, to ensure all its resources stayed concentrated on Russia. Ukraine has very little money to spare, even less manpower on the home front, and next to zero capacity to send its best drone or air-defense experts away from the front lines. Yet despite those shortages, Kyiv announced on the eighteenth of March that it had deployed 201 anti-drone experts to the Middle East to assist partner governments across the Persian Gulf. Dozens more were already prepared to travel and have since been sent. According to Zelenskyy, the operators were dispatched in teams to the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and several other nations. Not only that, but Zelenskyy revealed that Ukraine had already developed excess production capacity specifically for drone interceptors. As of mid-March, by his own estimate, Ukraine could produce a minimum of 2,000 interceptor drones each day, but needed only half that number to defend itself. As he put it: "If a Shahed needs to be stopped in the Emirates, we can do it. If it needs to be stopped in Europe or the United Kingdom, we can do it." ## Drone Diplomacy on Tour By the end of that month, Zelenskyy had traveled across the Middle East to formalize arrangements for Ukraine to do exactly that. In Saudi Arabia, he met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and worked out a ten-year defense agreement allowing Ukraine to exchange technology and expertise, paving the way for substantial investment and a framework for future contracts. In Qatar, Zelenskyy signed a partnership for "collaboration in technological fields, development of joint projects, defense investments and the exchange of expertise in countering missiles and unmanned aerial systems." As with the Saudis, Qatar's collaboration would focus mainly on instruction and technology-sharing to counter missiles and unmanned systems. The United Arab Emirates followed with a similar agreement shortly after. In each case, many details were not disclosed and others were left intentionally ambiguous, but Ukraine is known to be weighing the prospect of building production lines on the soil of its Middle Eastern partners. By early April, Kyiv was in talks with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman over similar cooperative arrangements. All of this unfolded despite the rumored frustration of the United States, where defense officials were reportedly upset with the Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia, for pursuing agreements outside their relationships with Washington. Yet, as the Saudi Crown Prince purportedly reminded the United States, its defense decisions are a matter of Saudi national interest. For Riyadh and the other Gulf capitals, that interest dictated pursuing any arrangement that could stop the attacks coming their way. ## Reciprocal Benefit For the Gulf states, the advantages of partnering with Ukraine are obvious. Kyiv possesses technical knowledge, operational experience, and a purpose-built anti-drone arsenal that the United States and other nations cannot match. For Ukraine, the rationale is less obvious, given that it has its own war to fight. Yet its decision is driven by a clear strategic calculus, not merely to build goodwill or generate good press, but to bring Ukraine closer to its own victory over Russia. First come the practical payoffs, including direct compensation. Supporting the Gulf states is far from charity, and the Gulf states know it. They have been more than happy to agree to resource deals in exchange for Ukraine's assistance. According to Zelenskyy, Ukraine will receive direct supplies of crude oil to be processed in Europe, as well as the processed diesel fuel it needs urgently. In other cases, Kyiv will receive direct cash payments to spend as it sees fit in support of the war effort. Zelenskyy has also indicated the Gulf states may send types of air-defense interceptors less useful against Iran but more useful to Ukraine in defending its energy infrastructure. Just as important as the payments are the infusions Gulf capitals are providing for Ukraine's defense industry. By Ukraine's own admission, the country could be producing double the volume of military hardware it currently manufactures, but lacks the funds to do so. At first the Gulf states will receive hardware already built or set aside from current production lines. After that, they will help create new production lines that Ukraine will still have access to, long after the Gulf orders are filled. ## The Strategic Dividend These deals are also critical to Ukraine for strategic reasons. None of the Gulf states is a military powerhouse, but they are hardly irrelevant on the global stage. They are immensely wealthy, supply a high share of the world's energy needs, and wield broad influence. Right now Ukraine has only a handful of consistent advocates on the world stage, concentrated mostly in Europe, while a wide range of other nations are either partial to Russia or interested in preserving their place on the sidelines. Even countries that were once much closer to Ukraine, like the United States, have grown more distant. If Ukraine can make good on its new arrangements, it will be able to count on Gulf influence to advance its causes and pressure other countries to work more closely with Kyiv. This is not simply goodwill. If Ukraine helps keep the Gulf states safe, then it is in their interest that Ukraine remains safe, stable, and free to produce the defense equipment they are counting on. The Gulf states need to do business with Ukraine, and the Russian invasion is clearly getting in the way. Then there are all the ways these deals hurt Russian interests as much as they help Ukraine's. The Gulf states' postures toward Russia and Ukraine are mutually exclusive: drawing closer to Ukraine necessarily means drifting further from Moscow. The Gulf states are very important to Russia as an enduring trade partner, a guardian of Russian offshore finance, a tourism and investment destination, and a broker of Russian relations with the rest of the world. Those relationships cannot continue as normal if the Gulf forms deeper ties with the country Russia is trying to invade. ## Brothers in Hatred, Brothers in Weapons A better Gulf military response to Iran is also a way for Ukraine to batter one of Russia's closest allies. Moscow has supported Tehran's war effort, built up its military, propped up its economy, and helped it skirt sanctions for years. Russia has relied heavily on Iranian drone designs to continue its war with Ukraine, but today Iran relies just as much on Russian components to build its drones faster and cheaper than it otherwise could. As Zelenskyy framed it in March: "The regimes in Russia and Iran are brothers in hatred, and that is why they are brothers in weapons. And we want regimes built on hatred to never win, in anything." Equally important, Ukraine is helping the Gulf states find ways to support Kyiv without taking a hard stance against Russia that might backfire. When Gulf states agree to supply Ukraine with cash rather than trade military hardware, that is no accident. Providing weapons directly would create immense friction with Russia, a relationship Gulf nations are not necessarily fond of, but one they would be very hesitant to blow up completely. Handing over money is different. The Gulf states know the cash will probably support Ukraine's war effort, directly or indirectly, but once it is transferred, they can wash their hands of the matter. Russia is welcome to start an argument over those payments, but if it did, Gulf states might be inclined to reconsider other deliberately ambiguous arrangements, including ones that benefit Russia. ## From Aid Recipient to Arms Exporter Finally, these early agreements are an ideal way for Ukraine to begin its path toward becoming a post-war arms exporter. When Ukraine's war with Russia eventually ends, Kyiv will be the premier source of modern drones, and other countries will be eager for its help in rethinking how they build production lines, adapt technology in real time, and cope with the constantly changing nature of the modern battlefield. The Gulf states' eagerness has already set a helpful precedent, with other countries engaging more openly around post-war arms agreements than before. In mid-April, Germany began work with Ukraine on plans to jointly produce advanced drones and other systems, with the apparent intent to cover a very wide range of drone and missile technology. Ukraine has also agreed to increase security cooperation with Syria, an unexpected partnership expected to bring Kyiv into far closer alignment with Syria's primary sponsor, Turkey. On the home front, Ukrainian startups are pivoting toward international demand, with Fire Point, designer of Ukraine's Flamingo cruise missile, now looking to create a new, cheap air defense system as soon as next year. The situation Ukraine faces is one it never asked for. It is under invasion by a much larger, more militarily powerful, and more economically potent adversary, one that appears hell-bent on erasing Ukraine from existence no matter the cost. But across several years of continuous conflict, Ukraine has proven able to adapt, again and again, to make the most of a painful and dangerous set of circumstances. For most of the world, the war in the Middle East has meant instability, energy shocks, and horror at the bloodshed across an entire region, and Ukraine has felt all those problems too. Yet Ukraine has turned the Iran conflict into an opportunity. As long as it can hold its current course, it will emerge from these chaotic months in a stronger position than ever before. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### Why were the Gulf states' air defenses unable to stop Iran's attacks? Several limitations compounded at once. Different systems are built for different threats, so a system designed to intercept ballistic missiles cannot stop low-flying drones and vice versa. Interceptors are far more expensive than the projectiles they shoot down: Iran's Shahed-136 drone costs roughly $50,000 to build while a single US Patriot interceptor costs over $4 million. And every battery can launch only so many interceptors before reloading, so a large enough swarm guarantees some leakage even with perfect accuracy. ### How severe was the interceptor shortage, and how did Ukraine fit in? In just the first ten days of the conflict, the UAE alone destroyed 241 ballistic missiles and nearly 1,400 drones. With PAC-3 interceptors produced at only about 600 per year and THAAD at roughly 96, the US had to pull stockpiles from Europe and the Indo-Pacific. By mid-March, Gulf states were choosing which targets to intercept to avoid running out entirely. Ukraine, meanwhile, could produce at least 2,000 interceptor drones per day and needed only half that for its own defense, making it the most immediately available surplus supplier in the world. ### What exactly did Ukraine provide to the Gulf states, and what did it receive in return? Ukraine deployed 201 anti-drone specialists to the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and others, with dozens more to follow, offering instruction, technology-sharing, and expertise in countering drones specifically adapted from Iranian base models. In return, Kyiv received direct crude oil supplies for processing in Europe, urgently needed diesel fuel, direct cash payments, and certain air-defense interceptors. Crucially, Gulf capitals also funded new production lines that Ukraine will retain access to long after Gulf orders are filled. ### Which defense agreements did Zelenskyy sign, and with whom? Zelenskyy signed a ten-year defense agreement with Saudi Arabia covering technology exchange and defense investment, a partnership with Qatar for collaboration in technological fields and countering missiles and unmanned systems, and a similar agreement with the United Arab Emirates. By early April 2026, Ukraine was also in talks with Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman over comparable cooperative arrangements. ### How do these deals damage Russian interests? The deals pull the Gulf states away from Moscow, which relies on them as an enduring trade partner, offshore finance guardian, and diplomatic broker. They also strengthen the Gulf response against Iran, one of Russia's closest allies, which depends on Russian components to build its drones just as Russia depends on Iranian drone designs. And because the Gulf states are transferring cash rather than weapons directly, they support Ukraine's war effort while leaving Russia little leverage to object without jeopardizing its own ambiguous arrangements with those same governments. ## Related Coverage - [All the Ways the US Could Intervene in Iran](/articles/geopolitics/all-the-ways-the-us-could-intervene-in-iran) - [America and Israel Attack Iran: Operation Epic Fury](/articles/geopolitics/america-israel-attack-iran-operation-epic-fury) ## Sources 1. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2r4wxdw3no 2. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/27/ukraine-announces-defense-pact-with-saudi-arabia 3. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-28/ukraine-saudi-arabia-agree-to-share-drone-and-missile-expertise/106505792 4. https://jamestown.org/ukraine-saudi-arabia-defense-agreement-highlights-demand-for-battle-tested-expertise/ 5. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/18/over-200-ukrainian-military-experts-in-gulf-region-to-counter-irans-drones 6. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-saudi-arabia-sign-deal-defence-cooperation-zelenskiy-says-2026-03-27/ 7. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/03/ukraine-inks-defense-agreements-with-qatar-and-saudi-arabia-with-uae-to-follow/ 8. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/ukraine-uae-agree-cooperate-defence-zelenskiy-says-2026-03-28/ 9. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/28/zelenskyy-signs-air-defence-deals-with-uae-qatar-on-gulf-tour 10. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/03/28/ukraines-zelenskyy-agrees-to-defense-cooperation-with-uae-qatar/ 11. https://www.france24.com/en/ukraine-uae-seal-defence-deal-kyiv-s-know-how-and-equipment-gain-recognition 12. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-war-middle-east-news-updates/card/ukraine-agrees-to-10-year-defense-cooperation-with-gulf-countries-IETFUeY4WMDrqEA935jY 13. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/ukraine-talks-with-oman-kuwait-bahrain-security-cooperation-zelenskiy-says-2026-04-10/ 14. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/73696 15. https://www.eenews.net/articles/ukraine-secures-oil-lifeline-from-gulf-states-in-exchange-for-military-aid/ 16. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy-secures-oil-lifeline-gulf-states-military-support/ 17. https://www.euronews.com/2026/04/10/ukrainians-shot-down-irans-drones-in-the-gulf-what-does-kyiv-get-in-return 18. https://www.euractiv.com/news/ukraine-opens-defence-expertise-export-in-middle-east-security-deals/ 19. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-continues-remarkable-rise-from-aid-recipient-to-security-provider/ 20. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2026/02/arab-world-russia-support 21. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/russias-closer-ties-with-gulf-deliver-an-arabic-speaking-tourism-boom-2026-02-27/ 22. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/zelenskiy-syria-meet-president-sharaa-sources-say-2026-04-05/ 23. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-missile-maker-targets-game-changer-air-defence-system-by-2027-2026-04-06/ 24. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-volodymyr-zelenskyy-warms-up-with-black-sea-strongman-turkiye/ 25. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/turkeysource/zelenskyys-middle-east-and-turkey-tour-reveals-a-new-regional-order-in-the-making/ 26. https://www.gmfus.org/news/iran-war-deals-ukraine-new-diplomatic-cards 27. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/27/zelenskyy-saudi-visit-us-troops-middle-east-iran-ukraine-aid-shahed-drones.html 28. https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/26/facing-european-cold-shoulder-ukraine-turns-to-middle-east-partners 29. https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-deepens-gulf-security-ties-kyiv-exports-air-defense-expertise-zelenskyy-united-arab-emirates/ 30. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/03/29/world/ukraine-gulf-arms-deals-focus/ 31. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20260328-zelensky-agrees-defence-cooperation-with-uae-qatar-on-gulf-tour 32. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-deploys-228-specialists-middle-east-discussing-serious-agreements-2026-03-20/ 33. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20260329-zelensky-visits-jordan-on-middle-east-tour-to-bolster-security-ties 34. https://www.wsj.com/world/the-middle-east-needs-to-learn-how-ukraine-stops-cheap-drones-ae1e36e2 35. https://www.politico.eu/article/iran-war-shockwaves-force-saudi-arabia-to-strike-security-deal-with-ukraine/ 36. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/10/zelenskyy-says-ukrainian-interceptors-downed-iran-drones-in-the-middle-east 37. https://cepa.org/article/zelenskyys-drone-diplomacy-wins-new-arab-friends/ 38. https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-drone-defense-playbook-maybe-ideal-middle-east-interceptors-2026-4 39. https://www.newarab.com/analysis/why-gulf-states-turned-ukraine-defence-deals 40. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-iran-shahed-drones-gulf-zelensky-b2955057.html 41. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddq7j48p35o 42. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-military-bases-gulf-useless-after-iranian-strikes-experts-say 43. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/interceptor-shortage-could-force-gulf-states-selective-targets 44. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10715958 45. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2026/03/the-gulf-states-offensive-options-against-iran/ 46. https://www.economist.com/international/2026/03/13/gulf-states-are-burning-through-interceptors 47. https://www.wsj.com/world/gulf-allies-turn-away-from-u-s-for-fresh-ammo-9960be73 48. https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-are-unintended-consequences-us-iran-conflict-defense-and-security <!-- youtube:eip1jHpeFbg -->