--- title: "Vladimir Putin: The Making of a Modern Warlord" description: "The age of kings is supposed to be over. The old emperors and chieftains surrendered their domains long ago, and the pharaohs, caliphs, and archdukes have been consigned to history. Yet in Russia the tsar still reigns, ruling with an iron fist and relishing the wary gaze of rivals across the world. His name is Vladimir Putin, and he sits at the center of a global spiderweb of power and secrecy so dense that even his own biography resists clean telling.\n\nFrom his early days inside the KGB, trying to prop up a crumbling Soviet Union, to his decades at the modern Kremlin, Putin's ascent has been marked by all the cunning of a chess master and all the corruption and violence of a crime lord. His nation he guides relentlessly down a path of his own choosing; his people he indoctrinates into an ideology as nuanced as it is authoritarian; his neighbors he treats with the imperial intent of the tsars of old, and his enemies abroad he treats as weaklings. To understand the war in Ukraine, the architecture of the modern Russian state, and the man who built both, you have to start at the beginning, in a city still reeling from one of the most apocalyptic sieges in human history.\n\nThe thesis is simple and unsettling: Vladimir Putin is less an aberration than the logical product of a brutal upbringing, a dying empire, and a lifetime of patient, ruthless accumulation of power.\n\n## Key Takeaways\n- Putin was born in 1952 in postwar Leningrad to parents who barely survived the wartime siege; his street-fighting childhood and KGB fixation shaped a worldview built on power, loyalty, and the conviction that a single intelligence officer could rule the fate of thousands.\n- His KGB career was mostly tedium, capped by a posting to Dresden where he watched the Soviet collapse firsthand, leaving him with a permanent fear of state paralysis.\n- Putin reentered public life under St. Petersburg mayor Anatoly Sobchak, amid allegations of resource-for-food corruption, then climbed rapidly through Moscow to head the FSB before Boris Yeltsin chose him as a compromise successor.\n- A wave of 1999 apartment bombings, blamed on Chechen militants but shadowed by an FSB \"training exercise\" caught planting explosives, coincided with the Second Chechen War and propelled Putin to the presidency.\n- Putin governed by centralization, bringing television, the oligarchs, and the regions under Moscow's control while pioneering a rule that he never punished an enemy without giving them somewhere to go.\n- The 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine trace a single logic of asserting a Russian sphere of influence against NATO expansion.\n- Two ideologies anchor his Russia: Putinism, a system prizing stability and concentrated power, and the Russkiy Mir, a vision of Russian civilization extending well beyond Russia's borders.\n\n## Little Volodya: A Childhood Forged in Ruins\n\nVladimir Vladimirovich Putin was born on October 7, 1952, into a family already marked by tragedy. Both parents had survived the Siege of Leningrad only narrowly: his mother nearly starved, his father endured shrapnel wounds to both legs that left him in pain for life. Putin had two older brothers he never knew. One, Viktor, died as a toddler during the siege, taken by diphtheria and starvation and buried in a mass grave with five hundred thousand others, though conflicting accounts hint at another tragedy the world will likely never learn. The other, Albert, died in infancy in the 1930s. Of Putin's six paternal uncles, five died in the war, and his mother did not bear her third child until she was forty-one.\n\nThe family was neither rich nor the poorest of the poor. They shared a flat with two other families around a communal four-burner stove, but had a television, a telephone, and access to a dacha. His father worked in a factory, his mother took odd jobs as janitor, baker, and night watchman. Kept out of preschool to avoid disease, young Vladimir was left to himself, drawn to the drunks and thugs of his apartment block's courtyard. A small boy, bullied relentlessly, he preferred the company of his tormentors to the cold and solitude of home.\n\nIn that crucible he learned to fight, taking up sambo and judo, which he has continued throughout his life. A childhood friend described a boy who would bite, scratch, and beat larger opponents, ignoring whatever rules others played by. Putin joined a street gang, an experience that taught him a rule he never forgot: if a fight is inevitable, you have to throw the first punch.\n\n## From Hooligan to KGB Recruit\n\nIn the classroom, the lessons of the street clashed with the quiet of academia. By first grade Putin already carried a self-image in which being a hard, grimy thug outranked anything school could offer. He was the only child in his school barred from the Young Pioneers, the communist answer to the Boy Scouts. Asked later whether things had really been so bad, Putin was unrepentant: \"Of course. I was no Pioneer; I was a hooligan.\" Pressed further, he insisted, \"I was a real thug.\"\n\nThat defiance did not last. By thirteen he changed his outlook, was rewarded with Young Pioneer membership and election as class chairman, and began reading Marx and Lenin. He developed a fixation on spycraft, collecting every book, pamphlet, and film he could find on the KGB and keeping a portrait of Soviet military-intelligence founder Yan Berzin at his desk. While classmates dreamed of becoming cosmonauts, Putin visited a KGB office before finishing secondary school. The advice he received was to become a lawyer and wait for them to reach out. Eventually, they did.\n\nHe stunned everyone by aiming for Leningrad State University, one of the best institutions in Soviet Russia. With grades that ranged from excellent to merely passable, his acceptance remains a mystery; the Soviet system rested on oral and written exams rather than transcripts, and the KGB may have pulled strings for a marked recruit. He enrolled in the law program in 1970, joined the Communist Party as required, and graduated in 1975, by which point the KGB had selected him from over one hundred members of his cohort.\n\n## A Spy in the Tedium\n\nFor a man of high ambition, Putin's early KGB years were a disappointment. After training he joined the pencil-pushers, producing reports, tips, tails, and wiretaps in an organization convinced that a single dissident could topple the Communist Party. Assigned to counterintelligence in Leningrad, where there were no embassies and little intelligence value, he had almost nothing to do, spending four and a half years in the agency's monotony, broken only by an officers' school stint he later called \"entirely unremarkable.\"\n\nThe period was not a total waste. He met Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Ocheretnaya, a flight attendant, and courted her for over three years. He was thirty-one when they married, by which age over ninety percent of Russian men had already wed. He was no romantic. As biographer Masha Gessen recounted, his proposal was a study in failed communication: he listed his self-perceived flaws so insistently that Lyudmila thought he was breaking up with her, before he instead asked her to marry him.\n\nIn 1984 he was finally admitted to the KGB's proper spy school. He showed up in three-piece suits regardless of the heat, though instructors flagged a \"lowered sense of danger\" and noted he was closed-off and unsociable. His mastery of German made a posting abroad inevitable. A placement in West Germany would have been a dream of real intrigue and real money. Instead his luck ran out: he was sent to East Germany, and not even to East Berlin, but to Dresden, a backwater firmly under Soviet control.\n\n## Dresden and the Paralysis of Power\n\nIn Dresden there were few informants to recruit and little spywork to do. By most accounts Putin conceded defeat. He stopped exercising, gained weight, focused on his two young daughters, and appeared depressed. His work amounted to approaching foreign students, mostly from Latin America, and being told the KGB's offers were too small to entice them.\n\nAs he declined, so did the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev had taken power the same year Putin arrived, and the KGB, loyal not to the man but to the Soviet vision, watched what they saw as Gorbachev dismantling Soviet culture. When protests broke out, Putin did not fight. In early 1990, outside the Stasi building in Dresden, he watched a mob storm the headquarters. When the crowd turned toward his own KGB office, he tried to defuse the situation, claiming to be only an interpreter. Reaching out to the military, he was told Moscow had not yet decided how to respond, and was left for hours, hiding indoors burning documents until his wood stove split from the heat.\n\nHe later distilled the lesson: \"I realized that the Soviet Union was ill. It was a fatal illness called paralysis. A paralysis of power.\" That fear of a center too weak to act while the streets boiled became a permanent fixture of his worldview. He returned to Leningrad and his old, dismal workplace, but the city had changed. Dissidents protested openly, and when the state cracked down, people fought back.\n\n## The Sobchak Years and the First Corruption Allegations\n\nRather than stay buried in the formal KGB apparatus, Putin returned to Leningrad State University, where it was normal for officers to embed in institutions. There he attached himself to Anatoly Sobchak, a law professor turned nationally recognized pro-democracy figure who had seized control of the Leningrad City Council. How they connected is disputed; Gessen's view is that Sobchak chose Putin precisely for his KGB bona fides, preferring a quiet, worldly, well-connected operator to the turtleneck-wearing ideologues of the democratic movement. Putin claims he left the KGB in 1990 over a blackmail scheme, but no resignation letter has ever surfaced.\n\nWhen the August 1991 coup against Gorbachev failed, power slid behind the scenes to Boris Yeltsin, who took the helm as Russia became the largest state to break from the Soviet Union. In Leningrad, renamed St. Petersburg, Sobchak became mayor and Putin became deputy mayor for international relations, his first real political post. The organizer Marina Salye later alleged Putin had helped redirect meat meant for hungry Leningrad to Moscow to win favor for the coup plotters; her allegations to senior ministers were ignored.\n\nAs deputy mayor, Putin cultivated an image of utter unflappability. He spoke of asserting a state monopoly on casinos, while Salye alleged he had instead entered St. Petersburg into legally questionable contracts exporting Russian natural resources in exchange for food. He chose partners directly without competition, his office skipped required signatures, the food never arrived, and the equivalent of tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks flowed where that food should have been. When Salye tried to have him removed, she was ignored again, and it was her City Council, not Putin, that was dissolved.\n\n## Building the Network: From St. Petersburg to the FSB\n\nPutin's influence grew out of his control over most of St. Petersburg's finances. He did not shut businesses down or seize them; he linked them inextricably to the city and to himself. He became Sobchak's indispensable representative on law enforcement, leveraging old KGB contacts in the new FSB and forming ties with organized criminals, controlling media access, and handing trusted associates lucrative assets that would grow into the oligarchic fortunes of today. By rewarding greed and exploiting fear, he wove allies into a network with himself at its heart.\n\nWhen Sobchak lost his 1996 reelection bid, Putin declined a job with the incoming administration, choosing loyalty over opportunism. The campaign had been violent, with Sobchak's campaign manager attacked first with sulfuric acid and then by gunfire, yet Putin emerged untouched. He moved to Moscow as deputy head of the presidential property management office. When Sobchak fell ill under questionable circumstances and faced an investigator, Putin engineered his transfer to a trusted doctor and then spirited him to Paris.\n\nIn Moscow, Putin wrote an economics dissertation later found to be heavily plagiarized from an American textbook, and climbed fast. Yeltsin promoted him to First Deputy Chief of the Presidential Staff in May 1998, and two months later to Director of the FSB, the KGB's direct descendant. His low rank unsettled the generals, but he carried out orders, dismissing two thousand agents to demonstrate loyalty and insisting on remaining the FSB's first civilian director. He inherited a scandal in which five officers complained of being ordered to assassinate an oligarch; Putin acted on the claim but merely reassigned the man who gave the order. The leader of those whistleblowers was Aleksandr Litvinenko, who would die in agony in London in 2006, poisoned with polonium-210.\n\n## A Compromise Successor\n\nBy early 1999, Yeltsin was a man under siege: in poor health, deeply unpopular, facing impeachment, and surrounded only by a small circle known as the Family. He needed a successor who would be loyal, keep a low profile, and be tolerable to enough power brokers to defeat former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov. Putin had impressed Yeltsin with his work in St. Petersburg, his refusal to be slowed by Moscow's rivalries, and his toughness on extremism. He had also won the trust of oligarch Boris Berezovsky, a Yeltsin loyalist, by once refusing a bribe and cultivating the relationship even as Russian high society abandoned Berezovsky.\n\nThe decisive conversation came in Biarritz in July 1999, where Putin was vacationing, having even given French intelligence the slip. Berezovsky persuaded him to be floated as a successor, but only if Yeltsin offered the role personally. Yeltsin's reaction was ambivalent; Berezovsky recalled him saying, \"He seems all right, but he is kind of small.\" Still, Putin was a candidate almost everyone could stomach in a poisonous environment. As Gessen put it, \"Everyone could invest this gray, ordinary man with what they wanted to see in him.\"\n\nConfirmed as Prime Minister in mid-August 1999, Putin was widely dismissed as a puppet expected to spin out of office like his predecessors. He proved otherwise within hours. In his first television interview he threatened to imprison striking workers; shortly after he authorized airstrikes into Chechnya, raised soldiers' pay, and centralized the chain of command through himself. Within two weeks his forces had devastated parts of Dagestan at heavy civilian cost, violence that in his mind was a piece in a larger game.\n\n## The Apartment Bombings and the Road to the Presidency\n\nThen the explosions began. On August 31, 1999, a homemade bomb near Red Square killed one and injured thirty. On September 4, a truck bomb in Dagestan killed fifty-eight; a larger second device was disarmed an hour later. A week later, a Moscow-suburb apartment building was destroyed, killing 106; days after that a similar blast killed 119. On September 16, a fifth attack southeast of Moscow killed nineteen. All five were blamed on Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev's militants. In total, the attacks killed no fewer than 303 people and injured well over 600.\n\nThe official narrative cracked on September 22, when an off-duty bus driver spotted a suspicious scene outside his apartment block. Police found a device made from three 110-pound sacks labeled \"sugar\" but filled with the explosive hexogen. The driver had seen European Russians, not Chechens, planting it, and one had phoned FSB headquarters. Two suspects detained that night were released after producing FSB paperwork. More than a day later, the FSB declared the episode a training exercise using a dummy device, claiming the hexogen detector had malfunctioned. Worse, the Speaker of the Duma had announced the September 16 bombing on September 13, three days before it occurred.\n\nIn the years since, evidence has emerged suggesting the FSB may not have been behind the campaign, and many Western experts dispute its involvement entirely, but none of that was available to Russians at the time. Putin escaped blame, judged too new to have coordinated such an operation, and his businesslike prosecution of the Second Chechen War won the public over. As Yeltsin's approval cratered and Putin's climbed, the empty suit began to look like a contender. Yeltsin invented a party called Unity, and on New Year's Eve 1999 resigned, making Putin Acting President. \"We, who have been in power for many years, must go,\" Yeltsin said, asking forgiveness from those who had hoped for an easy leap from the totalitarian past to a bright future.\n\n## Acting President: Strongman and Statesman\n\nPutin's first act as Acting President was a misstep. He seized the pen Yeltsin had used to anoint him and granted Yeltsin immunity from prosecution. The reasoning had merit, as Russia had never managed a peaceful transition of power, but Yeltsin did not know it was coming and later called it \"a rather questionable decision.\" Worse, it made Putin's entire rise look like a charade designed to protect his patron.\n\nHe then reshuffled the government, elevating old St. Petersburg allies, among them Dmitry Medvedev, while ushering out officials seen as too loyal to Yeltsin. The campaign that followed was classic Putin: a vigorous, combative strongman unbothered by his rivals. He spent New Year's Eve in the barracks with troops in Chechnya, returned in the co-pilot's seat of an Su-27 fighter, and laid out a sweeping vision of Russia's path forward, distinct from both the Soviet Union and the West, aimed at restoring great-power status against American unilateralism.\n\nThe campaign carried a darker edge. His old mentor Sobchak, recently returned from Paris, helped erratically, calling Putin \"the new Stalin\" as if it were praise. In February 2000 Sobchak was sent to campaign in Kaliningrad, where he died of what was officially a massive heart attack; both his bodyguards were later treated for symptoms of poisoning. On March 26, 2000, with roughly seventy percent turnout, Putin won 53.4 percent of the vote in an election widely seen as fair. The opposition organizer Marina Salye, after one terrifying meeting with a \"certain person\" in the office of ally Sergei Yushenkov, fled to the countryside; Yushenkov was shot dead in 2002.\n\n## President Putin: Centralization and Crisis\n\nThe months around his election determined what kind of leader he would be. Abroad, he opened backchannels with the West, hosting Tony Blair before the vote was counted and even telling the BBC he was open to joining NATO, a remark widely read as cheap point-scoring but a signal he might cooperate in private. At home, his focus was centralization. When a television station aired the theory that the FSB was behind the apartment bombings, masked men raided it, and the channel was later brought under state ownership. By 2003, the state controlled all three of Russia's main television channels.\n\nWith the oligarchs he struck a bargain: he held off prosecuting them for the Yeltsin-era plunder, and whatever they had collected they could keep and grow, provided the mad scramble stopped and they stayed out of politics. As he told twenty-one of Russia's biggest businessmen, \"The last thing you should do is blame the mirror.\" Berezovsky, who fancied himself a kingmaker and treated Putin as an underling, refused the deal, organized an opposition that floundered for over a decade, and died in London exile in 2013 under inconclusive circumstances.\n\nNot every crisis was handled deftly. In August 2000 the nuclear submarine Kursk sank with 119 aboard; rescuers bungled the effort, Putin delayed accepting foreign help and stayed at a Sochi resort, and the press juxtaposed images of dead sailors with their leader on the beach. All 119 died. Yet Putin then did something unprecedented for a Russian leader: he subjected himself to an hours-long meeting with the outraged families, took personal accountability, and his approval rebounded. From then on he involved himself immediately in every crisis; when a 2002 theater hostage siege ended with 125 dead in a botched rescue, he was credited with breaking the siege rather than blamed for the deaths.\n\n## The Rule of No Exit Without an Exit\n\nPutin extended a personal rule to the presidency: never punish a potential enemy without giving them somewhere to go. Military officials blamed for the Kursk were set up with private-sector jobs for life. Journalists fired from a disbanded channel continued at a replacement overseen by Putin allies. When he brought television to heel, he left print and the internet largely alone, at least for a time. In every tightening of his grip, he left an avenue for relief, turning would-be enemies into people with an incentive to live with the new order.\n\nThis is roughly the point where the deaths around Putin become too numerous to catalog. In Chechnya, his war degenerated into terror attacks. His chosen Chechen leader, Akhmad Kadyrov, was killed in an explosion, and power passed to his son Ramzan, who still rules Chechnya; on Putin's fifty-fourth birthday in 2006, journalist Anna Politkovskaya was shot dead, an act widely suspected to be Ramzan Kadyrov's gift. In the worst attack of the period, nearly 800 schoolchildren and hundreds of adults were taken hostage; when the siege broke, 186 children, 149 adults, and ten special forces officers died in a six-hour firefight, a horror so great it turned even sympathizers against the guerrillas.\n\nInternationally, these years were defined by Putin's relationship with the United States. He impressed Bush by appealing to his Christian faith, backed him fully after September 11, helped the US acquire Central Asian bases despite the NATO encirclement they implied, and avoided condemning the Iraq invasion even knowing the regime lacked the weapons America claimed, all pragmatic choices to avoid standoffs over nuclear drawdown and missile defense. NATO was another matter. He had taken its intervention against Serbia over Kosovo as an act of war against a Russian ally and never looked back, using Bush's European partners as a punching bag while sparing Bush directly.\n\n## Georgia, Multipolarity, and the Turn Against the West\n\nBy 2005 Putin was pivoting from disruptor toward lifelong autocrat. He chased not world domination but the protection of Russia's sphere of influence over eastern Europe, central Asia, and parts of the Middle East that he believed the United States enjoyed over its own regions. At the center of his thinking was the Russian diaspora, the millions of ethnic Russians stranded in newly independent states where they could be outvoted in Ukraine, denied citizenship in Latvia, or stripped of property in Turkmenistan. From his perspective, the region's instability traced back to the moment those Russians became disenfranchised expatriates.\n\nHe wielded gas as leverage through state monopoly Gazprom, once switching off Ukraine's supply the same day Russia assumed the G8 presidency. The defining saga of his second term was Georgia, whose President Mikheil Saakashvili, installed by the 2003 Rose Revolution, sought to draw down Russian influence with American backing. At a 2007 Munich summit, Putin complained that Russia was \"being lectured about democracy. But for some reason, those who teach us do not want to learn themselves.\" He was pushing not for Soviet revival but for multipolarity, even as he kept Russia in the G8.\n\nThe breakdown accelerated in early 2008, when Kosovo declared independence with US and EU recognition. To Putin this was no more legitimate than Abkhazia's wish to leave Georgia, which the same powers had ignored. Four days later he warned Saakashvili: \"You know we have to answer the West on Kosovo... you are going to be a part of that answer,\" promising greater support for the breakaway regions and adding, \"Nobody can be trusted! Except me. I will do what I promise.\" Few Western leaders took the threat seriously.\n\n## The Shadow President and the Invasion of Georgia\n\nBarred by the constitution from a third consecutive term, Putin had no intention of leaving. His economy had recovered, taxes were the lowest flat rate in Europe, and violent crime had dropped sharply, so the public would have tolerated him breaking the rules. Instead he maneuvered, elevating his trusted deputy Dmitry Medvedev, a former Gazprom board chairman and Putin chief of staff. Medvedev won just over seventy percent in elections most of the world judged neither free nor fair, then named Putin Prime Minister, an obvious workaround that let power shift informally between the offices. Putin declined to legally redefine those powers, trusting the understanding he had built, and became chairman of United Russia.\n\nMedvedev carried out the invasion of Georgia, which began on August 8, 2008, while Putin sat among world leaders at the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony. Saakashvili had been baited into attacking his breakaway province, where Russian troops waited to launch a vastly disproportionate counter-invasion under the pretext of defense. Putin, not Medvedev, managed the crisis at the border, and Russian bombers and helicopters shattered the Georgian defense within three days. Russia then withdrew and left Georgia its sovereignty, while Medvedev recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent, completing the tit-for-tat over Kosovo and previewing the Eastern Europe of today.\n\nBehind the scenes, Putin pulled the strings as Medvedev negotiated New START, worked with Obama on Iran, and secured a years-long understanding that Georgia and Ukraine would stay out of NATO. Around this time Putin separated from his wife and was linked to Olympic medalist Alina Kabayeva, thirty-one years his junior. His personality cult flourished, with shirtless photo ops on horses and boats, staged archaeological \"discoveries,\" and even an incident in which he performed dentistry on a provincial governor. One religious sect proclaimed him the reincarnation of St. Paul.\n\n## Putinism and the Russkiy Mir\n\nWhen Medvedev overextended, calling for liberalization and failing to veto the UN resolution that enabled the NATO intervention against Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Putin saw a mortal offense. In September 2011 Medvedev announced he would step aside, and Putin returned to the presidency in a swap that looked preordained. The news landed badly in a more worldly, more connected Russia, where a developing middle class took to the streets and an anti-corruption activist named Aleksei Navalny began his rise. Putin placated the protesters by airing their complaints on state television, then won with sixty-three percent. During his third inauguration, observers noticed tears on his cheeks. As biographer Philip Short wrote, \"After 12 years in power, Putin had come to see himself as the incarnation of the state.\"\n\nTwo concepts now anchor his Russia. Putinism, named to echo Stalinism, concentrates power in a trusted few who climb higher, accumulate wealth, bring in their own affiliates, and gain control over business, finance, media, and agriculture as oligarchs whose fates intertwine with the state. The public is discouraged from politics, treating leaders as managers rather than overlords, trading some democratic freedom for personal freedom and the chance to enrich themselves. Its keyword is stability. Deeply conservative, it treats peaceful protest, opposition, and shifting cultural norms as inherently destabilizing; change itself is the enemy, and the future should look like the present, only slightly better year by year.\n\nThe Russkiy Mir, or Russian World, is the other side of the coin: a vision of Russian civilization extending beyond Russia's borders to Ukraine, Georgia, much of the former Soviet Union, and the diaspora, for whom Putin's Russia casts itself as a benevolent imperial force. It carries Russian nationalism, exceptionalism, and anti-Westernism, and has metastasized into a desire to unite the global Russian people into one state. Together, Putinism and the Russkiy Mir make the rest of the story legible.\n\n## Life Under Putin: Wealth, Loyalty, and Mutual Assured Destruction\n\nDay-to-day, Putin lets the oligarchs accumulate wealth so long as they stay out of politics, with one added clause: an oligarch who wants to conduct especially shady business is expected to compensate, through a personal contribution or a benefit to the state, while a slice of that money is siphoned into what experts allege is a massive slush fund shared among Putin's ex-KGB inner circle.\n\nOn paper Putin owns little: a salary equivalent to $140,000 a year, an 800-square-foot apartment, a couple of cars. In reality he controls vast sums. In 2017 an American financier told the US Senate Judiciary Committee that Putin was the richest man in the world, with some $200 billion. He is believed to hold a Black Sea palace, more than a dozen homes, hundreds of cars, dozens of aircraft, and a mega-yacht, almost all held in the names of allies. He enjoys this wealth at his partners' pleasure, an arrangement that functions like an internal Cold War: if too many of the mega-rich tire of him they can strip his riches in an instant, and if one goes rogue, the rest stand by while he handles it.\n\nHis most successful public argument has always been that Russia's detractors are hypocrites who accuse Russia of conduct they excuse in themselves. Early on, when Russia was a geopolitical question mark, the charge carried weight. But as Putin has grown more isolated, sourcing information from an ever-shrinking inner circle, the argument has thinned, and he has increasingly repeated fabrications that are demonstrably false.\n\n## Ukraine, Crimea, and the Point of No Return\n\nReturning to the presidency in 2012, stung by the middle class he felt had betrayed him, Putin shifted his focus to lower-class workers. Police grew freer to brawl with protesters, NGOs taking foreign money were branded foreign agents, and the performance-art group Pussy Riot saw three members jailed for two years. Navalny was hit with fraud charges, placed under house arrest, and sentenced to five years, then freed to run for Moscow mayor and lose with a quarter of the vote in an unusually free contest where the incumbent held every advantage.\n\nAbroad, Russia threw its weight around. From 2012 it propped up Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and in 2013 it ran interference with Obama to prevent US military action even after the regime crossed the chemical-weapons \"red line.\" Putin welcomed Edward Snowden as a calculated insult to Washington, banned American adoptions of Russian children, and tightened the noose at home, criminalizing libel, registering bloggers, blocking websites, and targeting Russia's LGBT population as religious conservatism searched for an enemy. The Sochi Olympics of 2014 passed without incident, except for the annexation of Crimea. As Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych fled to Moscow amid a popular uprising, Putin saw his opening. An operation led by a then-unknown Defense Minister, Sergei Shoigu, sent unmarked \"green\" paratroopers into Crimea on the eve of the Closing Ceremonies; within a week they controlled the peninsula, Ukraine's 22,000 troops there did not resist, and the West imposed sanctions and nothing more.\n\nHis approval soared past eighty percent, but the envelope was pushed further than he wanted. Pro-Russian separatists rose in the Donbas regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, held independence referenda against Putin's wishes, and were flooded with Russian veterans, Chechen militiamen, weapons, and command. On July 17, 2014, a Russian-supplied Buk system shot down what separatists believed was a Ukrainian transport but was in fact Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, killing all 298 aboard. Western intelligence traced the launcher to the Russian 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade. Russia's deniability was gone and unrecoverable. This, WarFronts would argue, was the moment that made Russian isolation and full-scale war in Ukraine inevitable.\n\n## Becoming a Pariah and the Road to 2022\n\nCut loose from the international order, Putin balanced detachment against the impossibility of full decoupling, his isolation buying new partners among states and non-state actors once considered beneath Russia. A week after MH17, Russian armored columns beat back Ukraine's offensive, freezing the front for eight years. In Syria, Putin discarded nuance: a force was either for Assad or against him. Russian troops and a crippling air campaign leveled cities like Aleppo at vast civilian cost while Putin blamed Western recklessness in Iraq and Libya. When a downed warplane nearly triggered conflict with Turkey, Putin exposed Ankara's purchases of Islamic State oil and retaliated economically, eventually bringing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan under his sway and a foothold of influence over NATO.\n\nWithin a few years Putin had made Russia a true rival hegemon rather than a petulant child with nuclear weapons. Then his cyber apparatus hacked Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and released thousands of emails. He may have meant it as another instance of doing to America what America did to others, but it was received as an unforgivable slight. Donald Trump proved less a partner than a political tool, and Putin came to believe no American president could shift the underlying politics: \"They come and go. But the politics remain the same... then the people with the briefcases arrive... and instantly, everything changes.\"\n\nWhen Joe Biden took office in 2021, the two knew each other well; Biden recalled telling Putin years earlier, \"When I look into your eyes, I don't think you have a soul,\" and Putin replying, \"We understand each other.\" Behind the early diplomacy, Putin prepared the defining act of his fourth term. On February 24, 2022, he launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, framing it as a mission to demilitarize and \"denazify\" a country he falsely claimed was committing genocide against Russians, and asserting that Russians and Ukrainians were one people. His true motivation centered on the conviction that NATO expansion into Eastern Europe had become intolerable, a view he held with remarkable consistency even as it overstated the actual threat.\n\n## The Catastrophe in Ukraine and the President for Life\n\nThe invasion bore no resemblance to the plan. Two hundred thousand Russian troops pushed in, stalled, failed to reach Kyiv, and were hammered by counterattacks. Oligarchs, including members of Putin's inner circle, were given no warning to move assets that were quickly confiscated abroad. Russia had badly underestimated Ukraine's will to fight, and Putin's economic leverage proved far weaker than his advisers claimed. Western intelligence revealed that aides, too afraid to tell the truth, had kept him from the scale of Russia's losses. The ineptitude echoed Georgia in 2008 and Chechnya, failures left unfixed for over a decade.\n\nHis isolation deepened. The winnowing of trusted loyalists left fewer people able to claim the tsar's ear, and a handful of hardliners dominate his daily counsel: Aleksandr Dugin, \"Putin's philosopher,\" who preaches a Russian civilization destined to rule Eurasia; Nikolai Patrushev, a KGB comrade since the 1970s and architect of the invasion; oil chief Igor Sechin; the Rotenberg brothers, once his judo partners and now Russia's richest family; and FSB head Alexander Bortnikov. Ukraine has targeted these ideological guides as well as the generals; in August 2022, Dugin's daughter Dariya Dugina was killed by a car bomb intended for her father.\n\nRe-elected in 2018 with seventy-seven percent, Putin saw the law changed so his term need not be his last. Navalny was poisoned with a nerve agent, survived, returned to Russia, and was sent to a penal colony, later turning up at an Arctic camp after vanishing for weeks. Would-be challenger Yekaterina Duntsova was disqualified on a technicality. The 2024 election will put Putin on track for a new six-year term that, if completed, would make him Russia's longest-serving leader since before Stalin and Tsar Nicholas II. Even now he has shifted goalposts, lowering expectations toward a ceasefire that would let Russia keep the Donbas and Crimea.\n\n## Is the End Coming Soon?\n\nWhatever comes next, Putin's story ends only with his demise. If he steps down, Patrushev tops most successor lists, with Medvedev, former bodyguard Alexei Dyumin, and Moscow mayor Sergei Sobyanin also in circulation. A sudden death would hand the presidency to current Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, competent, well-liked, and unremarkable, much as a young Prime Minister Putin once was.\n\nThen there is the possibility that Putin dies sooner than expected. He is in his early seventies in a country where men are expected to live to about seventy-three. Rumors of cancer are not new; from 2016 to 2019 he frequently traveled with a thyroid-cancer surgeon, and US intelligence figures told Newsweek in 2022 he had undergone treatment for advanced cancer. In public he has slouched, gripped tables, suffered apparent leg spasms, and looked bloated. His mental stability has been questioned too, from claims that Western opposition leaders are routinely killed by the state, to staged, subservient meetings with ministers that some read as a ploy to seem unstable and others as evidence of genuine isolation or decline.\n\nA deteriorating Putin raises the odds of a sudden power transfer, of infighting, or of ill-advised wartime escalation, even as his inner circle might quietly take the keys without his noticing. To understand him fully is to start where his life did: in a city where thousands were eventually charged for eating their neighbors during the siege. Layered atop that beginning are decades of experience, ideology, and unlikely coincidence that elevated a bullied, fatherless street fighter into the incarnation of a state. He resists simplicity, yet taken in his totality, the thing he has become at least begins to make sense.\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n### What shaped Vladimir Putin's worldview before he entered politics?\n\nBorn on October 7, 1952, in Leningrad to parents who barely survived the wartime siege, Putin grew up in poverty, was bullied relentlessly, joined a street gang, and learned from judo that if a fight is inevitable you throw the first punch. His later KGB posting in Dresden, where he watched the Soviet state collapse around him while Moscow gave no orders, left him with a permanent fear of a paralyzed center unable to act.\n\n### How did Putin rise from a little-known FSB director to acting president?\n\nBoris Yeltsin needed a successor who would be loyal, keep a low profile, and be tolerable to competing power brokers. Putin had impressed Yeltsin through his work in St. Petersburg, his refusal to be slowed by Moscow rivalries, and his toughness on extremism. Confirmed as Prime Minister in August 1999, he was widely dismissed as a puppet, but within hours threatened striking workers and authorized airstrikes into Chechnya. On New Year's Eve 1999 Yeltsin resigned and named him Acting President.\n\n### What were the 1999 apartment bombings and why do they remain controversial?\n\nA series of five attacks killed no fewer than 303 people and were blamed on Chechen militants, fueling the Second Chechen War and catapulting Putin to the presidency. The official narrative cracked when a bus driver reported European Russians — not Chechens — planting a hexogen device, two suspects were released after producing FSB paperwork, and the agency later claimed the whole episode was a training exercise with a dummy device.\n\n### What is the difference between Putinism and the Russkiy Mir?\n\nPutinism is a domestic system that concentrates power in a trusted few who accumulate wealth and control business, finance, and media as oligarchs whose fates intertwine with the state; its keyword is stability, and change itself is treated as the enemy. The Russkiy Mir, or Russian World, is its outward face — a vision of Russian civilization extending beyond Russia's borders to Ukraine, Georgia, and the diaspora, carrying nationalism, exceptionalism, and an ambition to unite the global Russian people into one state.\n\n### Why did Putin invade Ukraine in 2022, and how did the invasion go wrong?\n\nPutin publicly claimed to be demilitarizing and \"denazifying\" Ukraine, alleging a genocide against Russians that no evidence supports. His deeper motivation was the conviction that NATO expansion into Eastern Europe had become intolerable. The invasion bore no resemblance to the plan: two hundred thousand troops stalled, failed to reach Kyiv, and were hammered by counterattacks, while oligarchs were given no warning before their foreign assets were confiscated and aides had been too afraid to tell Putin the true scale of Russia's military weaknesses.\n\n## Sources\n1. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/putins-brother-died-siege-leningrad-which-bears-striking-resemblance-syrian-crisis-1585531\n2. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/world/europe/vladimir-putin-describes-loss-of-a-brother-at-ceremony.html\n3. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/07/17/putin-revenge-nato-west-ukraine/\n4. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2023/08/putin-russia-ukraine-war-cornered-rat-story/674890/\n5. https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=81394&page=1\n6. https://acestoohigh.com/2022/03/02/how-vladimir-putins-childhood-is-affecting-us-all/\n7. https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/vladimir-putin-70-russia-ukraine-war-background-president-life-covid-pandemic-b988399.html\n8. https://web.archive.org/web/20151119182033/http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.582099\n9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/russiagov/putin.htm\n10. https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/vladimir-putins-wealth-from-a-1-4-billion-mansion-and-700-cars-to-58-aircraft-heres-a-look-at-the-most-expensive-things-owned-by-the-russian-politician/3166536/\n11. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/17/business/putin-wealth-sanctions-invs/index.html\n12. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2022/06/21/behind-putin-s-wealth-lies-a-co-operative-holding-more-than-4-5-billion-in-assets_5987552_8.html\n13. https://apnews.com/article/russia-putin-oligarchs-rich-ukraine-war-9b167bb98ed050c5fbfadf0b069a0b8c\n14. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-cult-putin-idUSTRE74O52E20110525/\n15. https://www.vox.com/2015/6/17/8796659/vladimir-putin-shirtless-video\n16. https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-attempts-denistry-2011-11\n17. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88451\n18. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-kremlin-emboldened-what-is-putinism/\n19. https://www.csis.org/analysis/ideology-putinism-it-sustainable\n20. https://dgap.org/en/events/russkiy-mir-russian-world\n21. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/06/russia-putin-civilization/\n22. https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/publications/updates/putinism\n23. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20231220-russian-opposition-leader-navalny-goes-missing-as-putin-seeks-re-election\n24. https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/22/europe/navalny-disappearance-putin-election-intl-hnk/index.html\n25. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/would-be-putin-challenger-duntsova-barred-running-election-campaign-team-2023-12-23/\n26. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60573261\n27. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/world/europe/who-is-aleksandr-dugin.html\n28. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/mar/04/igor-sechin-the-epitome-of-power-in-putin-russia-rosneft-economy\n29. https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/putin-patrushev-plan-prigozhin-assassination-428d5ed8\n30. https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-patrushev-says-west-stoking-risk-nuclear-weapons-will-be-used-2023-11-08/\n31. https://www.forbes.com/profile/boris-rotenberg/\n32. https://www.forbes.com/profile/arkady-rotenberg/\n33. https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-advisers-too-afraid-tell-him-truth-ukraine-us-official-2022-03-30/\n34. https://www.businessinsider.com/why-did-russia-invade-ukraine-putin-politics-motive-2023-6\n35. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589\n36. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/us/politics/leaked-documents-putin-health.html\n37. https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-health-speculation-meeting-video-1699854\n38. https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-putin-treated-cancer-april-us-intelligence-report-says-1710357\n39. https://www.newsweek.com/has-putin-died-what-we-know-1838549\n40. https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-misinformation-heart-attack-telegram-3c25f229f994aaa87d837285412cb1be\n41. https://time.com/6284209/after-vladimir-putins-rule-in-russia/\n42. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/87633\n43. https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-successors-president-election-kremlin-58154b1f252908e76083c944efc6828e\n44. https://www.politico.eu/article/after-putin-12-people-ready-ruin-russia-next/\n45. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/daughter-ultra-nationalist-russian-ideologue-killed-suspected-car-bomb-attack-2022-08-21/\n46. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/how-putins-fear-of-democracy-convinced-him-to-invade-ukraine/\n47. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putin-admits-ukraine-invasion-is-an-imperial-war-to-return-russian-land/\n48. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/russia-s-invasion-ukraine-why-why-now\n\n" url: https://warfronts.pub/article/vladimir-putin-life-of-a-modern-warlord.md canonical: https://warfronts.pub/article/vladimir-putin-life-of-a-modern-warlord datePublished: 2026-06-02 dateModified: 2026-06-02 author: - name: Simon Whistler url: https://warfronts.pub/author/simon-whistler publisher: Warfronts image: "https://media.warfronts.pub/cdn-cgi/image/width=1600,height=900,fit=cover,quality=80,format=auto/articles/zti6uiQxfgM/hero.jpg" type: NewsArticle contentHash: d19ab9da55fa3e88e5819c26dca92f9fa77e238eade2c272a2aaf4bc9a73b2b9 tokens: 11385 summaryUrl: https://warfronts.pub/article/vladimir-putin-life-of-a-modern-warlord.md.summary.md --- The age of kings is supposed to be over. The old emperors and chieftains surrendered their domains long ago, and the pharaohs, caliphs, and archdukes have been consigned to history. Yet in Russia the tsar still reigns, ruling with an iron fist and relishing the wary gaze of rivals across the world. His name is Vladimir Putin, and he sits at the center of a global spiderweb of power and secrecy so dense that even his own biography resists clean telling. From his early days inside the KGB, trying to prop up a crumbling Soviet Union, to his decades at the modern Kremlin, Putin's ascent has been marked by all the cunning of a chess master and all the corruption and violence of a crime lord. His nation he guides relentlessly down a path of his own choosing; his people he indoctrinates into an ideology as nuanced as it is authoritarian; his neighbors he treats with the imperial intent of the tsars of old, and his enemies abroad he treats as weaklings. To understand the war in Ukraine, the architecture of the modern Russian state, and the man who built both, you have to start at the beginning, in a city still reeling from one of the most apocalyptic sieges in human history. The thesis is simple and unsettling: Vladimir Putin is less an aberration than the logical product of a brutal upbringing, a dying empire, and a lifetime of patient, ruthless accumulation of power. ## Key Takeaways - Putin was born in 1952 in postwar Leningrad to parents who barely survived the wartime siege; his street-fighting childhood and KGB fixation shaped a worldview built on power, loyalty, and the conviction that a single intelligence officer could rule the fate of thousands. - His KGB career was mostly tedium, capped by a posting to Dresden where he watched the Soviet collapse firsthand, leaving him with a permanent fear of state paralysis. - Putin reentered public life under St. Petersburg mayor Anatoly Sobchak, amid allegations of resource-for-food corruption, then climbed rapidly through Moscow to head the FSB before Boris Yeltsin chose him as a compromise successor. - A wave of 1999 apartment bombings, blamed on Chechen militants but shadowed by an FSB "training exercise" caught planting explosives, coincided with the Second Chechen War and propelled Putin to the presidency. - Putin governed by centralization, bringing television, the oligarchs, and the regions under Moscow's control while pioneering a rule that he never punished an enemy without giving them somewhere to go. - The 2008 invasion of Georgia, the 2014 annexation of Crimea, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine trace a single logic of asserting a Russian sphere of influence against NATO expansion. - Two ideologies anchor his Russia: Putinism, a system prizing stability and concentrated power, and the Russkiy Mir, a vision of Russian civilization extending well beyond Russia's borders. ## Little Volodya: A Childhood Forged in Ruins Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin was born on October 7, 1952, into a family already marked by tragedy. Both parents had survived the Siege of Leningrad only narrowly: his mother nearly starved, his father endured shrapnel wounds to both legs that left him in pain for life. Putin had two older brothers he never knew. One, Viktor, died as a toddler during the siege, taken by diphtheria and starvation and buried in a mass grave with five hundred thousand others, though conflicting accounts hint at another tragedy the world will likely never learn. The other, Albert, died in infancy in the 1930s. Of Putin's six paternal uncles, five died in the war, and his mother did not bear her third child until she was forty-one. The family was neither rich nor the poorest of the poor. They shared a flat with two other families around a communal four-burner stove, but had a television, a telephone, and access to a dacha. His father worked in a factory, his mother took odd jobs as janitor, baker, and night watchman. Kept out of preschool to avoid disease, young Vladimir was left to himself, drawn to the drunks and thugs of his apartment block's courtyard. A small boy, bullied relentlessly, he preferred the company of his tormentors to the cold and solitude of home. In that crucible he learned to fight, taking up sambo and judo, which he has continued throughout his life. A childhood friend described a boy who would bite, scratch, and beat larger opponents, ignoring whatever rules others played by. Putin joined a street gang, an experience that taught him a rule he never forgot: if a fight is inevitable, you have to throw the first punch. ## From Hooligan to KGB Recruit In the classroom, the lessons of the street clashed with the quiet of academia. By first grade Putin already carried a self-image in which being a hard, grimy thug outranked anything school could offer. He was the only child in his school barred from the Young Pioneers, the communist answer to the Boy Scouts. Asked later whether things had really been so bad, Putin was unrepentant: "Of course. I was no Pioneer; I was a hooligan." Pressed further, he insisted, "I was a real thug." That defiance did not last. By thirteen he changed his outlook, was rewarded with Young Pioneer membership and election as class chairman, and began reading Marx and Lenin. He developed a fixation on spycraft, collecting every book, pamphlet, and film he could find on the KGB and keeping a portrait of Soviet military-intelligence founder Yan Berzin at his desk. While classmates dreamed of becoming cosmonauts, Putin visited a KGB office before finishing secondary school. The advice he received was to become a lawyer and wait for them to reach out. Eventually, they did. He stunned everyone by aiming for Leningrad State University, one of the best institutions in Soviet Russia. With grades that ranged from excellent to merely passable, his acceptance remains a mystery; the Soviet system rested on oral and written exams rather than transcripts, and the KGB may have pulled strings for a marked recruit. He enrolled in the law program in 1970, joined the Communist Party as required, and graduated in 1975, by which point the KGB had selected him from over one hundred members of his cohort. ## A Spy in the Tedium For a man of high ambition, Putin's early KGB years were a disappointment. After training he joined the pencil-pushers, producing reports, tips, tails, and wiretaps in an organization convinced that a single dissident could topple the Communist Party. Assigned to counterintelligence in Leningrad, where there were no embassies and little intelligence value, he had almost nothing to do, spending four and a half years in the agency's monotony, broken only by an officers' school stint he later called "entirely unremarkable." The period was not a total waste. He met Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Ocheretnaya, a flight attendant, and courted her for over three years. He was thirty-one when they married, by which age over ninety percent of Russian men had already wed. He was no romantic. As biographer Masha Gessen recounted, his proposal was a study in failed communication: he listed his self-perceived flaws so insistently that Lyudmila thought he was breaking up with her, before he instead asked her to marry him. In 1984 he was finally admitted to the KGB's proper spy school. He showed up in three-piece suits regardless of the heat, though instructors flagged a "lowered sense of danger" and noted he was closed-off and unsociable. His mastery of German made a posting abroad inevitable. A placement in West Germany would have been a dream of real intrigue and real money. Instead his luck ran out: he was sent to East Germany, and not even to East Berlin, but to Dresden, a backwater firmly under Soviet control. ## Dresden and the Paralysis of Power In Dresden there were few informants to recruit and little spywork to do. By most accounts Putin conceded defeat. He stopped exercising, gained weight, focused on his two young daughters, and appeared depressed. His work amounted to approaching foreign students, mostly from Latin America, and being told the KGB's offers were too small to entice them. As he declined, so did the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev had taken power the same year Putin arrived, and the KGB, loyal not to the man but to the Soviet vision, watched what they saw as Gorbachev dismantling Soviet culture. When protests broke out, Putin did not fight. In early 1990, outside the Stasi building in Dresden, he watched a mob storm the headquarters. When the crowd turned toward his own KGB office, he tried to defuse the situation, claiming to be only an interpreter. Reaching out to the military, he was told Moscow had not yet decided how to respond, and was left for hours, hiding indoors burning documents until his wood stove split from the heat. He later distilled the lesson: "I realized that the Soviet Union was ill. It was a fatal illness called paralysis. A paralysis of power." That fear of a center too weak to act while the streets boiled became a permanent fixture of his worldview. He returned to Leningrad and his old, dismal workplace, but the city had changed. Dissidents protested openly, and when the state cracked down, people fought back. ## The Sobchak Years and the First Corruption Allegations Rather than stay buried in the formal KGB apparatus, Putin returned to Leningrad State University, where it was normal for officers to embed in institutions. There he attached himself to Anatoly Sobchak, a law professor turned nationally recognized pro-democracy figure who had seized control of the Leningrad City Council. How they connected is disputed; Gessen's view is that Sobchak chose Putin precisely for his KGB bona fides, preferring a quiet, worldly, well-connected operator to the turtleneck-wearing ideologues of the democratic movement. Putin claims he left the KGB in 1990 over a blackmail scheme, but no resignation letter has ever surfaced. When the August 1991 coup against Gorbachev failed, power slid behind the scenes to Boris Yeltsin, who took the helm as Russia became the largest state to break from the Soviet Union. In Leningrad, renamed St. Petersburg, Sobchak became mayor and Putin became deputy mayor for international relations, his first real political post. The organizer Marina Salye later alleged Putin had helped redirect meat meant for hungry Leningrad to Moscow to win favor for the coup plotters; her allegations to senior ministers were ignored. As deputy mayor, Putin cultivated an image of utter unflappability. He spoke of asserting a state monopoly on casinos, while Salye alleged he had instead entered St. Petersburg into legally questionable contracts exporting Russian natural resources in exchange for food. He chose partners directly without competition, his office skipped required signatures, the food never arrived, and the equivalent of tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks flowed where that food should have been. When Salye tried to have him removed, she was ignored again, and it was her City Council, not Putin, that was dissolved. ## Building the Network: From St. Petersburg to the FSB Putin's influence grew out of his control over most of St. Petersburg's finances. He did not shut businesses down or seize them; he linked them inextricably to the city and to himself. He became Sobchak's indispensable representative on law enforcement, leveraging old KGB contacts in the new FSB and forming ties with organized criminals, controlling media access, and handing trusted associates lucrative assets that would grow into the oligarchic fortunes of today. By rewarding greed and exploiting fear, he wove allies into a network with himself at its heart. When Sobchak lost his 1996 reelection bid, Putin declined a job with the incoming administration, choosing loyalty over opportunism. The campaign had been violent, with Sobchak's campaign manager attacked first with sulfuric acid and then by gunfire, yet Putin emerged untouched. He moved to Moscow as deputy head of the presidential property management office. When Sobchak fell ill under questionable circumstances and faced an investigator, Putin engineered his transfer to a trusted doctor and then spirited him to Paris. In Moscow, Putin wrote an economics dissertation later found to be heavily plagiarized from an American textbook, and climbed fast. Yeltsin promoted him to First Deputy Chief of the Presidential Staff in May 1998, and two months later to Director of the FSB, the KGB's direct descendant. His low rank unsettled the generals, but he carried out orders, dismissing two thousand agents to demonstrate loyalty and insisting on remaining the FSB's first civilian director. He inherited a scandal in which five officers complained of being ordered to assassinate an oligarch; Putin acted on the claim but merely reassigned the man who gave the order. The leader of those whistleblowers was Aleksandr Litvinenko, who would die in agony in London in 2006, poisoned with polonium-210. ## A Compromise Successor By early 1999, Yeltsin was a man under siege: in poor health, deeply unpopular, facing impeachment, and surrounded only by a small circle known as the Family. He needed a successor who would be loyal, keep a low profile, and be tolerable to enough power brokers to defeat former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov. Putin had impressed Yeltsin with his work in St. Petersburg, his refusal to be slowed by Moscow's rivalries, and his toughness on extremism. He had also won the trust of oligarch Boris Berezovsky, a Yeltsin loyalist, by once refusing a bribe and cultivating the relationship even as Russian high society abandoned Berezovsky. The decisive conversation came in Biarritz in July 1999, where Putin was vacationing, having even given French intelligence the slip. Berezovsky persuaded him to be floated as a successor, but only if Yeltsin offered the role personally. Yeltsin's reaction was ambivalent; Berezovsky recalled him saying, "He seems all right, but he is kind of small." Still, Putin was a candidate almost everyone could stomach in a poisonous environment. As Gessen put it, "Everyone could invest this gray, ordinary man with what they wanted to see in him." Confirmed as Prime Minister in mid-August 1999, Putin was widely dismissed as a puppet expected to spin out of office like his predecessors. He proved otherwise within hours. In his first television interview he threatened to imprison striking workers; shortly after he authorized airstrikes into Chechnya, raised soldiers' pay, and centralized the chain of command through himself. Within two weeks his forces had devastated parts of Dagestan at heavy civilian cost, violence that in his mind was a piece in a larger game. ## The Apartment Bombings and the Road to the Presidency Then the explosions began. On August 31, 1999, a homemade bomb near Red Square killed one and injured thirty. On September 4, a truck bomb in Dagestan killed fifty-eight; a larger second device was disarmed an hour later. A week later, a Moscow-suburb apartment building was destroyed, killing 106; days after that a similar blast killed 119. On September 16, a fifth attack southeast of Moscow killed nineteen. All five were blamed on Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev's militants. In total, the attacks killed no fewer than 303 people and injured well over 600. The official narrative cracked on September 22, when an off-duty bus driver spotted a suspicious scene outside his apartment block. Police found a device made from three 110-pound sacks labeled "sugar" but filled with the explosive hexogen. The driver had seen European Russians, not Chechens, planting it, and one had phoned FSB headquarters. Two suspects detained that night were released after producing FSB paperwork. More than a day later, the FSB declared the episode a training exercise using a dummy device, claiming the hexogen detector had malfunctioned. Worse, the Speaker of the Duma had announced the September 16 bombing on September 13, three days before it occurred. In the years since, evidence has emerged suggesting the FSB may not have been behind the campaign, and many Western experts dispute its involvement entirely, but none of that was available to Russians at the time. Putin escaped blame, judged too new to have coordinated such an operation, and his businesslike prosecution of the Second Chechen War won the public over. As Yeltsin's approval cratered and Putin's climbed, the empty suit began to look like a contender. Yeltsin invented a party called Unity, and on New Year's Eve 1999 resigned, making Putin Acting President. "We, who have been in power for many years, must go," Yeltsin said, asking forgiveness from those who had hoped for an easy leap from the totalitarian past to a bright future. ## Acting President: Strongman and Statesman Putin's first act as Acting President was a misstep. He seized the pen Yeltsin had used to anoint him and granted Yeltsin immunity from prosecution. The reasoning had merit, as Russia had never managed a peaceful transition of power, but Yeltsin did not know it was coming and later called it "a rather questionable decision." Worse, it made Putin's entire rise look like a charade designed to protect his patron. He then reshuffled the government, elevating old St. Petersburg allies, among them Dmitry Medvedev, while ushering out officials seen as too loyal to Yeltsin. The campaign that followed was classic Putin: a vigorous, combative strongman unbothered by his rivals. He spent New Year's Eve in the barracks with troops in Chechnya, returned in the co-pilot's seat of an Su-27 fighter, and laid out a sweeping vision of Russia's path forward, distinct from both the Soviet Union and the West, aimed at restoring great-power status against American unilateralism. The campaign carried a darker edge. His old mentor Sobchak, recently returned from Paris, helped erratically, calling Putin "the new Stalin" as if it were praise. In February 2000 Sobchak was sent to campaign in Kaliningrad, where he died of what was officially a massive heart attack; both his bodyguards were later treated for symptoms of poisoning. On March 26, 2000, with roughly seventy percent turnout, Putin won 53.4 percent of the vote in an election widely seen as fair. The opposition organizer Marina Salye, after one terrifying meeting with a "certain person" in the office of ally Sergei Yushenkov, fled to the countryside; Yushenkov was shot dead in 2002. ## President Putin: Centralization and Crisis The months around his election determined what kind of leader he would be. Abroad, he opened backchannels with the West, hosting Tony Blair before the vote was counted and even telling the BBC he was open to joining NATO, a remark widely read as cheap point-scoring but a signal he might cooperate in private. At home, his focus was centralization. When a television station aired the theory that the FSB was behind the apartment bombings, masked men raided it, and the channel was later brought under state ownership. By 2003, the state controlled all three of Russia's main television channels. With the oligarchs he struck a bargain: he held off prosecuting them for the Yeltsin-era plunder, and whatever they had collected they could keep and grow, provided the mad scramble stopped and they stayed out of politics. As he told twenty-one of Russia's biggest businessmen, "The last thing you should do is blame the mirror." Berezovsky, who fancied himself a kingmaker and treated Putin as an underling, refused the deal, organized an opposition that floundered for over a decade, and died in London exile in 2013 under inconclusive circumstances. Not every crisis was handled deftly. In August 2000 the nuclear submarine Kursk sank with 119 aboard; rescuers bungled the effort, Putin delayed accepting foreign help and stayed at a Sochi resort, and the press juxtaposed images of dead sailors with their leader on the beach. All 119 died. Yet Putin then did something unprecedented for a Russian leader: he subjected himself to an hours-long meeting with the outraged families, took personal accountability, and his approval rebounded. From then on he involved himself immediately in every crisis; when a 2002 theater hostage siege ended with 125 dead in a botched rescue, he was credited with breaking the siege rather than blamed for the deaths. ## The Rule of No Exit Without an Exit Putin extended a personal rule to the presidency: never punish a potential enemy without giving them somewhere to go. Military officials blamed for the Kursk were set up with private-sector jobs for life. Journalists fired from a disbanded channel continued at a replacement overseen by Putin allies. When he brought television to heel, he left print and the internet largely alone, at least for a time. In every tightening of his grip, he left an avenue for relief, turning would-be enemies into people with an incentive to live with the new order. This is roughly the point where the deaths around Putin become too numerous to catalog. In Chechnya, his war degenerated into terror attacks. His chosen Chechen leader, Akhmad Kadyrov, was killed in an explosion, and power passed to his son Ramzan, who still rules Chechnya; on Putin's fifty-fourth birthday in 2006, journalist Anna Politkovskaya was shot dead, an act widely suspected to be Ramzan Kadyrov's gift. In the worst attack of the period, nearly 800 schoolchildren and hundreds of adults were taken hostage; when the siege broke, 186 children, 149 adults, and ten special forces officers died in a six-hour firefight, a horror so great it turned even sympathizers against the guerrillas. Internationally, these years were defined by Putin's relationship with the United States. He impressed Bush by appealing to his Christian faith, backed him fully after September 11, helped the US acquire Central Asian bases despite the NATO encirclement they implied, and avoided condemning the Iraq invasion even knowing the regime lacked the weapons America claimed, all pragmatic choices to avoid standoffs over nuclear drawdown and missile defense. NATO was another matter. He had taken its intervention against Serbia over Kosovo as an act of war against a Russian ally and never looked back, using Bush's European partners as a punching bag while sparing Bush directly. ## Georgia, Multipolarity, and the Turn Against the West By 2005 Putin was pivoting from disruptor toward lifelong autocrat. He chased not world domination but the protection of Russia's sphere of influence over eastern Europe, central Asia, and parts of the Middle East that he believed the United States enjoyed over its own regions. At the center of his thinking was the Russian diaspora, the millions of ethnic Russians stranded in newly independent states where they could be outvoted in Ukraine, denied citizenship in Latvia, or stripped of property in Turkmenistan. From his perspective, the region's instability traced back to the moment those Russians became disenfranchised expatriates. He wielded gas as leverage through state monopoly Gazprom, once switching off Ukraine's supply the same day Russia assumed the G8 presidency. The defining saga of his second term was Georgia, whose President Mikheil Saakashvili, installed by the 2003 Rose Revolution, sought to draw down Russian influence with American backing. At a 2007 Munich summit, Putin complained that Russia was "being lectured about democracy. But for some reason, those who teach us do not want to learn themselves." He was pushing not for Soviet revival but for multipolarity, even as he kept Russia in the G8. The breakdown accelerated in early 2008, when Kosovo declared independence with US and EU recognition. To Putin this was no more legitimate than Abkhazia's wish to leave Georgia, which the same powers had ignored. Four days later he warned Saakashvili: "You know we have to answer the West on Kosovo... you are going to be a part of that answer," promising greater support for the breakaway regions and adding, "Nobody can be trusted! Except me. I will do what I promise." Few Western leaders took the threat seriously. ## The Shadow President and the Invasion of Georgia Barred by the constitution from a third consecutive term, Putin had no intention of leaving. His economy had recovered, taxes were the lowest flat rate in Europe, and violent crime had dropped sharply, so the public would have tolerated him breaking the rules. Instead he maneuvered, elevating his trusted deputy Dmitry Medvedev, a former Gazprom board chairman and Putin chief of staff. Medvedev won just over seventy percent in elections most of the world judged neither free nor fair, then named Putin Prime Minister, an obvious workaround that let power shift informally between the offices. Putin declined to legally redefine those powers, trusting the understanding he had built, and became chairman of United Russia. Medvedev carried out the invasion of Georgia, which began on August 8, 2008, while Putin sat among world leaders at the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony. Saakashvili had been baited into attacking his breakaway province, where Russian troops waited to launch a vastly disproportionate counter-invasion under the pretext of defense. Putin, not Medvedev, managed the crisis at the border, and Russian bombers and helicopters shattered the Georgian defense within three days. Russia then withdrew and left Georgia its sovereignty, while Medvedev recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent, completing the tit-for-tat over Kosovo and previewing the Eastern Europe of today. Behind the scenes, Putin pulled the strings as Medvedev negotiated New START, worked with Obama on Iran, and secured a years-long understanding that Georgia and Ukraine would stay out of NATO. Around this time Putin separated from his wife and was linked to Olympic medalist Alina Kabayeva, thirty-one years his junior. His personality cult flourished, with shirtless photo ops on horses and boats, staged archaeological "discoveries," and even an incident in which he performed dentistry on a provincial governor. One religious sect proclaimed him the reincarnation of St. Paul. ## Putinism and the Russkiy Mir When Medvedev overextended, calling for liberalization and failing to veto the UN resolution that enabled the NATO intervention against Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Putin saw a mortal offense. In September 2011 Medvedev announced he would step aside, and Putin returned to the presidency in a swap that looked preordained. The news landed badly in a more worldly, more connected Russia, where a developing middle class took to the streets and an anti-corruption activist named Aleksei Navalny began his rise. Putin placated the protesters by airing their complaints on state television, then won with sixty-three percent. During his third inauguration, observers noticed tears on his cheeks. As biographer Philip Short wrote, "After 12 years in power, Putin had come to see himself as the incarnation of the state." Two concepts now anchor his Russia. Putinism, named to echo Stalinism, concentrates power in a trusted few who climb higher, accumulate wealth, bring in their own affiliates, and gain control over business, finance, media, and agriculture as oligarchs whose fates intertwine with the state. The public is discouraged from politics, treating leaders as managers rather than overlords, trading some democratic freedom for personal freedom and the chance to enrich themselves. Its keyword is stability. Deeply conservative, it treats peaceful protest, opposition, and shifting cultural norms as inherently destabilizing; change itself is the enemy, and the future should look like the present, only slightly better year by year. The Russkiy Mir, or Russian World, is the other side of the coin: a vision of Russian civilization extending beyond Russia's borders to Ukraine, Georgia, much of the former Soviet Union, and the diaspora, for whom Putin's Russia casts itself as a benevolent imperial force. It carries Russian nationalism, exceptionalism, and anti-Westernism, and has metastasized into a desire to unite the global Russian people into one state. Together, Putinism and the Russkiy Mir make the rest of the story legible. ## Life Under Putin: Wealth, Loyalty, and Mutual Assured Destruction Day-to-day, Putin lets the oligarchs accumulate wealth so long as they stay out of politics, with one added clause: an oligarch who wants to conduct especially shady business is expected to compensate, through a personal contribution or a benefit to the state, while a slice of that money is siphoned into what experts allege is a massive slush fund shared among Putin's ex-KGB inner circle. On paper Putin owns little: a salary equivalent to $140,000 a year, an 800-square-foot apartment, a couple of cars. In reality he controls vast sums. In 2017 an American financier told the US Senate Judiciary Committee that Putin was the richest man in the world, with some $200 billion. He is believed to hold a Black Sea palace, more than a dozen homes, hundreds of cars, dozens of aircraft, and a mega-yacht, almost all held in the names of allies. He enjoys this wealth at his partners' pleasure, an arrangement that functions like an internal Cold War: if too many of the mega-rich tire of him they can strip his riches in an instant, and if one goes rogue, the rest stand by while he handles it. His most successful public argument has always been that Russia's detractors are hypocrites who accuse Russia of conduct they excuse in themselves. Early on, when Russia was a geopolitical question mark, the charge carried weight. But as Putin has grown more isolated, sourcing information from an ever-shrinking inner circle, the argument has thinned, and he has increasingly repeated fabrications that are demonstrably false. ## Ukraine, Crimea, and the Point of No Return Returning to the presidency in 2012, stung by the middle class he felt had betrayed him, Putin shifted his focus to lower-class workers. Police grew freer to brawl with protesters, NGOs taking foreign money were branded foreign agents, and the performance-art group Pussy Riot saw three members jailed for two years. Navalny was hit with fraud charges, placed under house arrest, and sentenced to five years, then freed to run for Moscow mayor and lose with a quarter of the vote in an unusually free contest where the incumbent held every advantage. Abroad, Russia threw its weight around. From 2012 it propped up Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and in 2013 it ran interference with Obama to prevent US military action even after the regime crossed the chemical-weapons "red line." Putin welcomed Edward Snowden as a calculated insult to Washington, banned American adoptions of Russian children, and tightened the noose at home, criminalizing libel, registering bloggers, blocking websites, and targeting Russia's LGBT population as religious conservatism searched for an enemy. The Sochi Olympics of 2014 passed without incident, except for the annexation of Crimea. As Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych fled to Moscow amid a popular uprising, Putin saw his opening. An operation led by a then-unknown Defense Minister, Sergei Shoigu, sent unmarked "green" paratroopers into Crimea on the eve of the Closing Ceremonies; within a week they controlled the peninsula, Ukraine's 22,000 troops there did not resist, and the West imposed sanctions and nothing more. His approval soared past eighty percent, but the envelope was pushed further than he wanted. Pro-Russian separatists rose in the Donbas regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, held independence referenda against Putin's wishes, and were flooded with Russian veterans, Chechen militiamen, weapons, and command. On July 17, 2014, a Russian-supplied Buk system shot down what separatists believed was a Ukrainian transport but was in fact Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, killing all 298 aboard. Western intelligence traced the launcher to the Russian 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade. Russia's deniability was gone and unrecoverable. This, WarFronts would argue, was the moment that made Russian isolation and full-scale war in Ukraine inevitable. ## Becoming a Pariah and the Road to 2022 Cut loose from the international order, Putin balanced detachment against the impossibility of full decoupling, his isolation buying new partners among states and non-state actors once considered beneath Russia. A week after MH17, Russian armored columns beat back Ukraine's offensive, freezing the front for eight years. In Syria, Putin discarded nuance: a force was either for Assad or against him. Russian troops and a crippling air campaign leveled cities like Aleppo at vast civilian cost while Putin blamed Western recklessness in Iraq and Libya. When a downed warplane nearly triggered conflict with Turkey, Putin exposed Ankara's purchases of Islamic State oil and retaliated economically, eventually bringing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan under his sway and a foothold of influence over NATO. Within a few years Putin had made Russia a true rival hegemon rather than a petulant child with nuclear weapons. Then his cyber apparatus hacked Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and released thousands of emails. He may have meant it as another instance of doing to America what America did to others, but it was received as an unforgivable slight. Donald Trump proved less a partner than a political tool, and Putin came to believe no American president could shift the underlying politics: "They come and go. But the politics remain the same... then the people with the briefcases arrive... and instantly, everything changes." When Joe Biden took office in 2021, the two knew each other well; Biden recalled telling Putin years earlier, "When I look into your eyes, I don't think you have a soul," and Putin replying, "We understand each other." Behind the early diplomacy, Putin prepared the defining act of his fourth term. On February 24, 2022, he launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, framing it as a mission to demilitarize and "denazify" a country he falsely claimed was committing genocide against Russians, and asserting that Russians and Ukrainians were one people. His true motivation centered on the conviction that NATO expansion into Eastern Europe had become intolerable, a view he held with remarkable consistency even as it overstated the actual threat. ## The Catastrophe in Ukraine and the President for Life The invasion bore no resemblance to the plan. Two hundred thousand Russian troops pushed in, stalled, failed to reach Kyiv, and were hammered by counterattacks. Oligarchs, including members of Putin's inner circle, were given no warning to move assets that were quickly confiscated abroad. Russia had badly underestimated Ukraine's will to fight, and Putin's economic leverage proved far weaker than his advisers claimed. Western intelligence revealed that aides, too afraid to tell the truth, had kept him from the scale of Russia's losses. The ineptitude echoed Georgia in 2008 and Chechnya, failures left unfixed for over a decade. His isolation deepened. The winnowing of trusted loyalists left fewer people able to claim the tsar's ear, and a handful of hardliners dominate his daily counsel: Aleksandr Dugin, "Putin's philosopher," who preaches a Russian civilization destined to rule Eurasia; Nikolai Patrushev, a KGB comrade since the 1970s and architect of the invasion; oil chief Igor Sechin; the Rotenberg brothers, once his judo partners and now Russia's richest family; and FSB head Alexander Bortnikov. Ukraine has targeted these ideological guides as well as the generals; in August 2022, Dugin's daughter Dariya Dugina was killed by a car bomb intended for her father. Re-elected in 2018 with seventy-seven percent, Putin saw the law changed so his term need not be his last. Navalny was poisoned with a nerve agent, survived, returned to Russia, and was sent to a penal colony, later turning up at an Arctic camp after vanishing for weeks. Would-be challenger Yekaterina Duntsova was disqualified on a technicality. The 2024 election will put Putin on track for a new six-year term that, if completed, would make him Russia's longest-serving leader since before Stalin and Tsar Nicholas II. Even now he has shifted goalposts, lowering expectations toward a ceasefire that would let Russia keep the Donbas and Crimea. ## Is the End Coming Soon? Whatever comes next, Putin's story ends only with his demise. If he steps down, Patrushev tops most successor lists, with Medvedev, former bodyguard Alexei Dyumin, and Moscow mayor Sergei Sobyanin also in circulation. A sudden death would hand the presidency to current Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, competent, well-liked, and unremarkable, much as a young Prime Minister Putin once was. Then there is the possibility that Putin dies sooner than expected. He is in his early seventies in a country where men are expected to live to about seventy-three. Rumors of cancer are not new; from 2016 to 2019 he frequently traveled with a thyroid-cancer surgeon, and US intelligence figures told Newsweek in 2022 he had undergone treatment for advanced cancer. In public he has slouched, gripped tables, suffered apparent leg spasms, and looked bloated. His mental stability has been questioned too, from claims that Western opposition leaders are routinely killed by the state, to staged, subservient meetings with ministers that some read as a ploy to seem unstable and others as evidence of genuine isolation or decline. A deteriorating Putin raises the odds of a sudden power transfer, of infighting, or of ill-advised wartime escalation, even as his inner circle might quietly take the keys without his noticing. To understand him fully is to start where his life did: in a city where thousands were eventually charged for eating their neighbors during the siege. Layered atop that beginning are decades of experience, ideology, and unlikely coincidence that elevated a bullied, fatherless street fighter into the incarnation of a state. He resists simplicity, yet taken in his totality, the thing he has become at least begins to make sense. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What shaped Vladimir Putin's worldview before he entered politics? Born on October 7, 1952, in Leningrad to parents who barely survived the wartime siege, Putin grew up in poverty, was bullied relentlessly, joined a street gang, and learned from judo that if a fight is inevitable you throw the first punch. His later KGB posting in Dresden, where he watched the Soviet state collapse around him while Moscow gave no orders, left him with a permanent fear of a paralyzed center unable to act. ### How did Putin rise from a little-known FSB director to acting president? Boris Yeltsin needed a successor who would be loyal, keep a low profile, and be tolerable to competing power brokers. Putin had impressed Yeltsin through his work in St. Petersburg, his refusal to be slowed by Moscow rivalries, and his toughness on extremism. Confirmed as Prime Minister in August 1999, he was widely dismissed as a puppet, but within hours threatened striking workers and authorized airstrikes into Chechnya. On New Year's Eve 1999 Yeltsin resigned and named him Acting President. ### What were the 1999 apartment bombings and why do they remain controversial? A series of five attacks killed no fewer than 303 people and were blamed on Chechen militants, fueling the Second Chechen War and catapulting Putin to the presidency. The official narrative cracked when a bus driver reported European Russians — not Chechens — planting a hexogen device, two suspects were released after producing FSB paperwork, and the agency later claimed the whole episode was a training exercise with a dummy device. ### What is the difference between Putinism and the Russkiy Mir? Putinism is a domestic system that concentrates power in a trusted few who accumulate wealth and control business, finance, and media as oligarchs whose fates intertwine with the state; its keyword is stability, and change itself is treated as the enemy. The Russkiy Mir, or Russian World, is its outward face — a vision of Russian civilization extending beyond Russia's borders to Ukraine, Georgia, and the diaspora, carrying nationalism, exceptionalism, and an ambition to unite the global Russian people into one state. ### Why did Putin invade Ukraine in 2022, and how did the invasion go wrong? Putin publicly claimed to be demilitarizing and "denazifying" Ukraine, alleging a genocide against Russians that no evidence supports. His deeper motivation was the conviction that NATO expansion into Eastern Europe had become intolerable. The invasion bore no resemblance to the plan: two hundred thousand troops stalled, failed to reach Kyiv, and were hammered by counterattacks, while oligarchs were given no warning before their foreign assets were confiscated and aides had been too afraid to tell Putin the true scale of Russia's military weaknesses. ## Sources 1. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/putins-brother-died-siege-leningrad-which-bears-striking-resemblance-syrian-crisis-1585531 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/world/europe/vladimir-putin-describes-loss-of-a-brother-at-ceremony.html 3. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/07/17/putin-revenge-nato-west-ukraine/ 4. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2023/08/putin-russia-ukraine-war-cornered-rat-story/674890/ 5. https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=81394&page=1 6. https://acestoohigh.com/2022/03/02/how-vladimir-putins-childhood-is-affecting-us-all/ 7. https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/vladimir-putin-70-russia-ukraine-war-background-president-life-covid-pandemic-b988399.html 8. https://web.archive.org/web/20151119182033/http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.582099 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/russiagov/putin.htm 10. https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/vladimir-putins-wealth-from-a-1-4-billion-mansion-and-700-cars-to-58-aircraft-heres-a-look-at-the-most-expensive-things-owned-by-the-russian-politician/3166536/ 11. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/17/business/putin-wealth-sanctions-invs/index.html 12. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2022/06/21/behind-putin-s-wealth-lies-a-co-operative-holding-more-than-4-5-billion-in-assets_5987552_8.html 13. https://apnews.com/article/russia-putin-oligarchs-rich-ukraine-war-9b167bb98ed050c5fbfadf0b069a0b8c 14. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-cult-putin-idUSTRE74O52E20110525/ 15. https://www.vox.com/2015/6/17/8796659/vladimir-putin-shirtless-video 16. https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-attempts-denistry-2011-11 17. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88451 18. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-kremlin-emboldened-what-is-putinism/ 19. https://www.csis.org/analysis/ideology-putinism-it-sustainable 20. https://dgap.org/en/events/russkiy-mir-russian-world 21. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/06/russia-putin-civilization/ 22. https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/publications/updates/putinism 23. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20231220-russian-opposition-leader-navalny-goes-missing-as-putin-seeks-re-election 24. https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/22/europe/navalny-disappearance-putin-election-intl-hnk/index.html 25. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/would-be-putin-challenger-duntsova-barred-running-election-campaign-team-2023-12-23/ 26. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60573261 27. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/world/europe/who-is-aleksandr-dugin.html 28. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/mar/04/igor-sechin-the-epitome-of-power-in-putin-russia-rosneft-economy 29. https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/putin-patrushev-plan-prigozhin-assassination-428d5ed8 30. https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-patrushev-says-west-stoking-risk-nuclear-weapons-will-be-used-2023-11-08/ 31. https://www.forbes.com/profile/boris-rotenberg/ 32. https://www.forbes.com/profile/arkady-rotenberg/ 33. https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-advisers-too-afraid-tell-him-truth-ukraine-us-official-2022-03-30/ 34. https://www.businessinsider.com/why-did-russia-invade-ukraine-putin-politics-motive-2023-6 35. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589 36. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/us/politics/leaked-documents-putin-health.html 37. https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-health-speculation-meeting-video-1699854 38. https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-putin-treated-cancer-april-us-intelligence-report-says-1710357 39. https://www.newsweek.com/has-putin-died-what-we-know-1838549 40. https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-misinformation-heart-attack-telegram-3c25f229f994aaa87d837285412cb1be 41. https://time.com/6284209/after-vladimir-putins-rule-in-russia/ 42. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/87633 43. https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-successors-president-election-kremlin-58154b1f252908e76083c944efc6828e 44. https://www.politico.eu/article/after-putin-12-people-ready-ruin-russia-next/ 45. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/daughter-ultra-nationalist-russian-ideologue-killed-suspected-car-bomb-attack-2022-08-21/ 46. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/how-putins-fear-of-democracy-convinced-him-to-invade-ukraine/ 47. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putin-admits-ukraine-invasion-is-an-imperial-war-to-return-russian-land/ 48. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/russia-s-invasion-ukraine-why-why-now <!-- youtube:zti6uiQxfgM -->