Nigeria: The Failing State the World is Ignoring

Imagine a failed state, and a small handful of world nations immediately come to mind. Somalia might be the most common answer, representing a nation so chronically weak and deeply corrupt that it is seemingly never more than a few inches from total collapse. Nations like Sudan or Libya certainly merit discussion, entirely split apart by warring factions with very little hope of reintegration.

Observers could easily discuss Myanmar, Yemen, or the Congo—nations that have proved utterly incapable of beating back brutal insurgencies, and appear completely uninterested in the fundamental well-being of their own people. Or, attention could turn to Haiti, a place where the “failed state” label might not perfectly fit, but only because it somehow undersells precisely how apocalyptic the situation there has truly gotten. However, one nation that might not immediately seem like a candidate for this grim list is the country of Nigeria.

As the most populous nation in Africa, and the sixth-most-populous in the entire world, Nigeria’s 236 million residents have watched their country ostensibly develop into one of the most powerful economies in Africa. It stands as a recognized leader on the continent and an ambassador for African ambition on the global stage. Rich in its history, and vibrantly diverse in its culture, Nigeria does not outwardly seem as if it could be teetering on the very edge of failure.

But what does not regularly make the international headlines are the relentless battles, the overlapping insurgencies, and the seemingly incessant massacres that are actively driving Nigeria to the absolute brink. This is the reality of Nigeria’s ongoing, rapidly deteriorating security crisis, representing a mad dash toward failed-statehood that the entire international community is effectively ignoring.

The Illusion of Progress and Deepening Poverty

All across the globe, it is exceptionally rare to find a nation that is dealing with a severe security crisis but does not appear to have any other systemic problems. Far more often, widespread violence goes hand-in-hand with corruption, exploitation, poverty, repression, or any number of other compounding factors. These issues usually overlap to create a much larger, entrenched state of chaos where violent non-state actors can easily thrive.

The nation of Nigeria is no different in this regard, and before analyzing the several overlapping security crises that Nigeria is simultaneously facing, it is vital to set the foundational scene. It is important to give a certain degree of credit where it is due, because Africa’s most populous nation does inherently have quite a few positive developments going for it. The macro-level Nigerian economy is currently recovering from recent periods of instability, and it is widely expected to continue growing for the foreseeable future.

Basic sanitation and electricity access are improving rapidly in many distinct parts of the nation. Infant mortality and overall extreme poverty rates are dropping in certain demographics, and the country’s broad human development metrics are demonstrably increasing year-over-year. But like so many other developing parts of the world, Nigeria’s outwardly positive indicators of macroeconomic progress only tell a mere fraction of the much larger story.

As of the year 2024, a full fifty-six percent of Nigerians lived directly below the national poverty line. This staggering figure is equivalent to approximately 129 million people, with absolute poverty rates proving especially high in the northern regions and in deeply rural areas. These are, consequently, the exact areas where the nation’s many insurgencies have taken the firmest root.

Food insecurity remains common, economic opportunity is exceedingly scarce, baseline inflation is punitively high, and the nation’s overall population is very young, with a full two-thirds of all Nigerians currently being under the age of 25 at a time when viable jobs for young people are increasingly scarce. The nation’s government is stunning in its profound corruption, deeply embedded at all levels of governance and permeating all branches of the state apparatus, while efforts to hold political and economic elites accountable almost never gain any real, lasting traction. Blatant vote buying and entrenched patronage networks are overwhelmingly common, state police are widely known for frequently engaging in civilian extortion, and daily life for women and girls across the country is particularly harsh and dangerous.

Even on the specific metrics where Nigeria is, overall, doing fairly well, its people inherently live in a persistent situation of pervasive inequality. Things are not getting better for everyone; rather, they are getting marginally better for some people and significantly worse for others. But when societal progress and human suffering are mathematically quantified, the statistical average tends to show a net progress—making it all the easier for the international community to entirely overlook tens of millions of marginalized people, for whom this purported progress simply is not a reality.

The Northeastern Crucible: Boko Haram and ISWAP

While daily life certainly is not easy in most metropolitan parts of Nigeria, it is life on the geographical and political fringes that can be particularly difficult. It is specifically on these neglected fringes that one finds all manner of rebel groups, internecine conflicts, and militant separatist insurgencies. To truly understand the crisis, observers must step away from the relatively secure economic hubs of cities like Lagos and Abuja, looking instead toward the nation’s vast rural areas, its many vulnerable peripheries, and the specific territories where government security forces are undeniably at their absolute weakest.

In the deeply troubled northeast, the security landscape is dominated by an infamous insurgency: Boko Haram. Fighting a continuous and brutal armed insurgency since July of 2009, Boko Haram is a militant jihadist organization with the uncompromising objective of overthrowing the internationally recognized Nigerian government, aiming to replace it with a regime based entirely on the group’s ultra-strict interpretations of Sharia law. While Boko Haram is actively operating in neighboring Cameroon, Niger, and Chad, it is northeastern Nigeria that has always been the group’s ideological and operational center, functioning as its primary launchpad for all manner of devastating terror attacks and large-scale insurgent offensives.

The group has gained horrific global notoriety for its exceptionally brutal attacks directed against unarmed civilians, its mass systematic kidnappings of vulnerable women and girls, and its formidable fighting strength. Estimates typically suggest the organization commands upward of ten thousand dedicated fighters at any given time, or perhaps even multiple tens of thousands across its various factions. Over two million people have been forcefully internally displaced within Nigeria strictly as a result of Boko Haram’s campaigns.

The total staggering death toll resulting from their direct and indirect actions—including both the people they have killed directly and those who have subsequently died as a result of conflict-induced famines, military crackdowns, rampant disease, and other catastrophic byproducts of the violence—now runs well into the multiple hundreds of thousands. But Nigeria’s severe troubles in the northeast absolutely do not stop with Boko Haram alone. The region is additionally terrorized by the Islamic State – West Africa Province, colloquially known and feared as ISWAP.

The organization originated as a distinct splinter group, first violently distinguishing itself from the core Boko Haram faction in 2016. Since that schism, it has systematically evolved into an exceptionally dangerous, highly capable threat across the wider geographic region. Like Boko Haram, ISWAP operates internationally, aggressively targeting nations ranging from Chad to Cameroon to Benin, Burkina Faso, and beyond.

It has been highly instrumental in deliberately building a much wider, interconnected network of Islamic State branches across the entire Sahel region, located just south of the vast Sahara. Estimated to command anywhere from four thousand well-armed fighters to seven thousand or more at any given time, ISWAP has fought deeply brutal inter-group battles against Boko Haram, while simultaneously notching a long, unbroken series of tactical victories against the official Nigerian military. It has occasionally been able to present itself as a somewhat legitimate local leader in the isolated territory it controls, although it has recently seemed to deliberately drop its calculated hearts-and-minds approach toward civilians.

It is now actively attacking those civilian groups with all the sheer regularity and destructive intent of any other hardened jihadist insurgency.

Separatism in Biafra and Expanding Banditry in the Northwest

Heading southward away from the jihadist strongholds, the nation faces an entirely different but equally persistent ongoing insurgency in the Nigerian southeast. There, a dedicated separatist group known as the Indigenous People of Biafra has actively waged a militant war against the Nigerian government for well over four years. Fighting primarily through a heavily armed paramilitary wing called the Eastern Security Network, the Biafra separatists view themselves as a direct successor movement to the historical Republic of Biafra—a partially recognized breakaway state that violently tried to secede in the late 1960s, triggering the devastating Nigerian Civil War.

After decades of subsequent regional instability and political marginalization, armed Biafra separatism has made a major, deadly comeback. Several distinct Biafra insurgencies are currently fighting side-by-side against the overstretched Nigerian government. The precise death toll over the last several years is incredibly difficult to accurately pin down, but deadly raids and violent skirmishes are a common occurrence.

Furthermore, these Biafran militants actively fight against not only the federal Nigerian government but also against local opportunistic bandits, entrenched criminal groups, and other shadowy organizations that actively work to take financial advantage of the prevailing regional chaos. Moving steadily through the relatively more stable southwesterly region near the economic capital of Lagos, the crisis landscape shifts again in the northwest, where the sheer dangers posed by highly organized gangs and rampant banditry have rapidly risen to a whole new catastrophic level. In this specific part of the country, localized bandit groups can, at times, effectively leverage military-grade combat equipment.

This dangerous capability is partly due to their past successful captures of modern kit from the retreating Nigerian military, and partly due to their direct access to much broader, highly lucrative weapons smuggling networks that crisscross the entire Sahel region. These heavily armed groups will frequently raid and systematically loot undefended villages, indiscriminately killing local occupants as they see fit, while simultaneously stealing valuable cattle, kidnapping and ransoming local residents for exorbitant sums, and preying on vulnerable travelers in remote or geographically secluded areas. The affected region is permanently home to some sixty million people, where extensive polling conducted by the United Nations strongly suggests that some eight out of every ten local residents explicitly consider armed banditry to be the greatest single threat to their communities—even despite the already high levels of food insecurity actively plaguing that exact same area.

The bandit groups are relatively anonymous, highly mobile, and typically seem to harbor very few ideological ambitions other than simply violently extorting as much physical wealth as they possibly can. Well over half a million innocent people have been internally displaced by this specific threat vector. Mass kidnappings, along with violent farm and commercial mine takeovers, are steadily becoming much more common.

The annual civilian death toll has tragically risen into the multiple thousands, with absolutely no tangible sign that the current rate of extreme violence will slow down anytime soon. The central Nigerian government has done a very notably poor job effectively intervening. As isolated rural areas become significantly more dangerous, critical hospitals and medical clinics are looted far more frequently, and vital food supplies grow ever more scarce.

The ultimate result has been profound and rapidly growing instability, deeply entrenched in a region where meaningful state relief seems to be a very faraway, almost impossible prospect.

The Middle Belt Massacres and the Escalating Farmer-Herder Conflict

Further complicating Nigeria’s dire security landscape is the Middle Belt, a vast and highly contested swathe of territory in central Nigeria that has been severely ravaged for multiple consecutive decades by a deeply entrenched conflict between settled farming communities and nomadic herding groups. On one specific side of the bitter fighting are the Fulani, a nomadic or semi-nomadic, and primarily Muslim demographic of traditional cattle herders; they systematically raise livestock and constantly travel around the broader region, seeking to graze those animals wherever they can find viable pasture. On the other side of the conflict are a wide range of distinct ethnic groups, comprising both Christians and Muslims, who live a significantly more sedentary life, carefully tending to established farmland and living in permanent rural communities.

While the escalating conflict certainly does have a distinctly religious component to its violence, and it has actually been officially classed as a genocide against Christians by the international organization Genocide Watch since 2022, it is not solely, or even primarily, a purely religious matter. Instead, the absolute crux of the violent issue is the rapidly shrinking availability of viable, arable farmland. This critical resource has become significantly more scarce after long-lasting and repeated severe droughts, aggressive desertification, and other compounding environmental problems.

This ecological pressure has forcefully brought traditional farmers and nomadic herders into direct, violent contact far more frequently. Both groups are desperately trying to use the exact same highly limited land to feed and sustain their own communities. As each respective group’s core population grows steadily larger, deadly military-grade weapons rapidly spread on the lucrative black market.

While religion is sometimes utilized as a primary motivator of extreme violence, it is almost always a highly convenient pretext deployed when these groups consider executing violence for other core territorial or economic reasons. Many thousands of innocent people have died over the intervening years, and large-scale village massacres are relatively common. Yet, even that exceptionally long list of ongoing regional conflicts does not tell the absolute whole story of Nigeria’s fracturing society.

Home to well over 350 distinct ethnic groups, Nigeria routinely sees constant, low-grade armed fighting in one area or another. These pervasive clashes occur between local groups harboring their own deep, long-held historical animosity, exacerbated by intense local economic stressors, spanning all across the vast country. Furthermore, Nigeria inadvertently serves as a geographic launchpad for a significant number of active insurgencies operating in other sovereign nations.

A prime example is Cameroon’s ongoing Ambazonia War, fought between the official Cameroonian government and English-speaking militant separatist groups that actively find safe harbor and operational staging grounds strictly on Nigerian soil. Northern Nigerian regions also consistently see intermittent violent spillover from various other interconnected conflicts raging in the broader Sahel region. Many of the nation’s own well-armed groups, like Boko Haram and its many associated gangs of ruthless bandits, are not conveniently constrained by arbitrary political geography.

All the while, the struggling nation is buffeted by a constant, unrelenting barrage of severe droughts, exceptionally poor crop yields, devastating seasonal floods, crippling spikes in domestic inflation, recurring political crises, and the rapid spread of deadly diseases. With so many overlapping, catastrophic shocks hitting the societal system all at once, rural and urban communities alike are getting increasingly poorer and significantly more vulnerable. Consequently, chaos only continues to spread—and with it, highly lucrative opportunities for bad actors all across Nigeria to violently take advantage.

An Intensifying Nationwide Surge in Violence

Already, it is exceedingly obvious that Nigeria is not functioning from a position of strength, but unfortunately, a thorough examination of recent security data indicates that there is significantly more systemic deterioration to document. In particular, it is crucial to analyze the recent, severe outbreaks of extreme violence occurring simultaneously all across the nation. Although each individual region within Nigeria might have historically experienced worse, isolated flare-ups in past years compared to what is happening right now, Nigeria’s overall, comprehensive security situation is currently showing undeniable signs of rapid, nationwide deterioration.

Returning to the threat of Boko Haram, the regional governor of Nigeria’s Borno State issued a stark, public warning in early April of 2024 that the entrenched terror group was actively in the deliberate process of making a major regional comeback. Borno State has tragically been the geographic epicenter of the Boko Haram conflict for quite some time, and it was precisely in Borno State where Boko Haram’s infamous 2014 mass kidnapping of hundreds of innocent schoolgirls originally gave the jihadist insurgency its lasting global notoriety. According to the regional governor, whose dire assessments are fully backed up by international intelligence sources closely covering the conflict, Boko Haram has aggressively engaged in a wide, highly coordinated range of attacks in early 2025.

Those recent attacks have deliberately targeted vital state security infrastructure, including fortified military bases and troop barracks, but also deeply vulnerable civilian communities, indicating where Boko Haram is clearly looking to rapidly expand its absolute sphere of territorial control. As the governor explicitly described, deadly ambushes, coordinated attacks, and mass kidnappings are now actively taking place almost on a daily basis without confrontation. That is to unequivocally say, Nigeria’s overwhelmed security forces have been entirely unable to meaningfully intervene.

The governor himself was violently targeted in one brazen Boko Haram attack, where the armed group heavily attempted to ambush his official convoy, albeit ultimately unsuccessfully. Prior to that high-profile assassination attempt, back in January, the terror group was heavily suspected of brutally killing at least forty unarmed farmers elsewhere in Borno State. The organization has successfully abducted federal judges, university professors, high-ranking security officials, and more.

It has simultaneously engaged in widespread, highly destructive assaults on populated civilian areas, designed both to sadistically punish local communities and to strategically place immense tactical pressure on the Nigerian military from all conceivable directions. In March, the group effectively used Nigerian territory as a secure launchpad for a devastating cross-border attack in neighboring Cameroon that directly killed twenty soldiers and completely destroyed much of their local forward bases. In April, a highly coordinated pair of attacks left at least twenty-two local people dead, and a subsequent assault by an armed splinter faction killed at least fifteen more locals in an isolated area where the militants have now undeniably attained near-complete local operational control.

In May, Boko Haram confidently launched major attacks on multiple fortified military bases with total impunity, and heavily suspected members of the insurgent group systematically killed at least twenty-three local farmers and fishermen in a single, unprovoked attack on a small, undefended village. Most recently, the jihadist forces mercilessly massacred at least fifty-seven innocent people across a pair of rural villages on May 19. Over a hundred other local individuals were forcefully disappeared during the massive attack, according to deeply traumatized eyewitness accounts, and more than seventy civilians are still officially recorded as permanently missing.

The specific villagers who were violently targeted in that particular brutal attack had been baselessly accused by the militants of acting as covert informants for the rival ISWAP faction. And speaking of that specific Islamic State franchise, ISWAP’s own coordinated attacks have rapidly picked up in both frequency and sheer scale over the last few turbulent months. In March, the terror group reportedly massacred anywhere from forty to a full one hundred farmers in a single, devastating attack spanning two villages.

Over the course of that exact same month, heavily armed ISWAP fighters actively overran at least a dozen hardened outposts and minor tactical positions officially controlled by the Nigerian military. That staggering surge in insurgent violence has continued unabated through April and May, successfully bringing down large, established military camps based directly in major population centers. They have achieved this via highly complex, coordinated nighttime attacks that have prominently included sophisticated diversionary assaults deliberately designed to cut off and lethally distract military reinforcements.

ISWAP is currently rapidly gathering massive stockpiles of heavy weapons and looted ammunition. It is notably becoming significantly more technically proficient in its deadly use of unmanned, bomb-dropping aerial drones, and it has undeniably become an increasingly stable, highly lethal branch of the broader global Islamic State insurgency. This alarming stability makes it a highly likely candidate to soon receive a major influx of important, battle-hardened jihadist leaders recently displaced from their previous operational strongholds in places like Somalia.

ISWAP successfully pulled off multiple coordinated attacks against both Nigerian and Cameroonian military camps in mid-May, completely overrunning an entire defensive battalion on one specific occasion and successfully stealing no fewer than forty-five operational military vehicles. A single day after that particular tactical victory, ISWAP confidently launched another massive wave of simultaneous, highly lethal assaults against several other regional bases. The group has ultimately become highly effective in forcefully capturing and permanently keeping control of large civilian areas, and it vividly appears to be advancing and diversifying its battlefield tactics far too rapidly for the lumbering Nigerian military to realistically keep up.

Unfortunately for the besieged nation of Nigeria, ISWAP is tragically no longer the absolute only Islamic State branch actively working to firmly set up shop within its borders. Another highly dangerous faction, officially affiliated with the deadly Islamic State-Sahel Province, has very recently popped up in the vulnerable northwest. This expansion started with a slow, creeping, methodical infiltration of deeply isolated communities late last year.

Since that specific time, the new insurgent group has successfully carried out over a dozen highly notable attacks, while simultaneously setting up lucrative, highly protected smuggling and illicit transport networks that will efficiently allow it to mutually support the broader ISWAP organization. The extreme violence in the nation’s Middle Belt, heavily dominated by the aforementioned intractable farmer-herder conflicts, is currently just as bad. In the most recent horrific outbreak of communal violence, starting roughly in April of this year, several massive, consecutive massacres have left well over a hundred unarmed civilians completely dead.

In the first major attack, well over fifty innocent members of agricultural farming communities were brutally killed across six separate villages by highly suspected armed herding groups, with about two thousand more terrified villagers permanently displaced from their ancestral homes. Mere weeks later, another massive, highly coordinated attack lethally killed at least fifty-one more people across two distinct villages, where family homes were systematically burned directly to the ground over the devastating course of a deeply brutal, unrelenting assault. Those specific attacks notably took place in Nigeria’s deeply divided Plateau State, but the contagion of extreme violence spread very shortly afterward to the directly neighboring Benue State.

There, also in mid-April, at least fifty-six unarmed people were mercilessly slaughtered in a highly organized, large-scale attack. In yet another devastating assault in early May, an additional twenty-three innocent people were violently killed in coordinated attacks striking four entirely separate rural villages. Tragically, these are fundamentally only the largest-scale attacks that overtly result in massive, headline-generating massacres.

Significantly smaller-scale, highly deadly encounters happen with terrifying frequency all across the vast expanse of the Middle Belt, too. In nearly every single documented case, whether objectively discussing a massive large-scale massacre or an isolated, individual targeted killing, deployed Nigerian soldiers and local law enforcement have consistently shown a profound inability to respond in time, or to respond with any degree of tactical effectiveness. Elsewhere across the vast territory of Nigeria, heavily armed insurgent groups and sophisticated criminal factions have eagerly taken full, violent advantage of the prevailing nationwide chaos.

In the heavily contested southern states where the Biafra separatist insurgency is highly active, a brazen attack in early May left at least thirty innocent civilian travelers dead, with their transport vehicles deliberately set completely ablaze. This horrific incident occurred strictly days after Nigeria’s federal President, Bola Tinubu, officially came to the broader area for a highly publicized state visit. Less than two short weeks later, armed Biafra insurgents confidently set up a fortified illegal roadblock and aggressively launched another massive attack, ruthlessly killing anywhere from fifteen to thirty terrified people in the ensuing violent process.

At the exact same time, heavily armed gangs and organized bandit groups have enjoyed considerable, highly lethal success of their own, generating a remarkably long list of high-casualty, deeply brutal attacks in just a brief two-month window. That grim tally explicitly includes at least nineteen innocent people dead following a massive, highly coordinated ambush and violent livestock-rustling attack occurring in the nation’s devastated northeast. Meanwhile, the deeply unstable northwest tragically saw twenty-one heavily armed, government-backed militiamen brutally killed in a sophisticated ambush, at least fifteen unarmed local farmers mercilessly massacred in another highly coordinated attack, and no fewer than twenty innocent laborers violently killed in a massive assault directed on an isolated gold-mining village.

Once again, these horrific incidents represent just the biggest, most visible recent attacks, and absolutely do not constitute a fully exhaustive list of the total violence. Pervasive smaller-scale attacks, deadly rural ambushes, highly targeted political killings, rampant systemic extortion, mass kidnapping rings, and fully insurgent-controlled local municipal governments are all a deeply depressing, unavoidable fact of daily life. The official Nigerian government has, thus far, shown remarkably little institutional ability or political will to directly, effectively intervene.

Military Shortcomings, Systemic Complicity, and Institutional Decay

At this highly critical stage, the catastrophic reality of what has been actively happening all across Nigeria is incredibly clear. It is distinctly worth emphasizing one more time, however, that the provided examples do not constitute a comprehensively exhaustive list of the thousands of lethal attacks executed within the last few turbulent months. The sheer scale, as well as the ever-expanding geographic scope of the pervasive violence, vividly illustrates the massive overarching problem currently facing the entirety of Nigeria.

At a highly desperate moment when the struggling nation and its deeply traumatized people desperately need immediate, effective relief, the cavalry simply is not coming to save them. The absolute first, and arguably most blatantly obvious systemic problem is a massively crippling logistical one. Nigeria’s federal military is currently stretched remarkably thin, desperately forced to permanently spread its 230,000 active-duty combat troops all across the massive expanse of the nation.

As a direct, unavoidable result of this overextension, they deeply struggle to rapidly deploy absolutely anywhere in sufficiently large combat numbers. They are only structurally able to launch major, coordinated counteroffensives highly infrequently. When they finally do manage to attack, deployed units often deeply struggle to reliably get vital access to the heavy mechanized weaponry or the critical close air support that might actually help to decisively ensure a battlefield victory.

They are additionally operating at a massive, permanent information disadvantage. Both the nation’s primary security forces and its local law enforcement agencies are chronically under-resourced and utterly unequipped to successfully track down a wide, highly diverse range of heavily armed asymmetric groups that are inherently excellent at rapidly disappearing straight into the rugged local landscape. The military is concurrently dealing with highly capable adversaries that are deeply dissimilar to each other in terms of their battlefield tactics, their core religious or political ideologies, and their primary strategic motivations.

Finally, each and every one of these diverse adversary groups definitively holds the tactical initiative within their respective conflict zones. Whether it is the jihadists of Boko Haram, the highly organized forces of ISWAP, the heavily armed rural bandits, or absolutely anybody else, the militants universally possess the tactical flexibility, the operational freedom, and the sheer sadistic desire to violently attack Nigeria’s embattled military and its highly vulnerable civilians exactly as they see fit. Meanwhile, the overstretched federal military must permanently maintain a highly reactive, purely defensive posture.

They are forced to rigidly keep to established, defensible static positions, and then theoretically use those heavily fortified positions to attempt to protect the massive surrounding civilian population. Just as deeply problematic, if not actually even more catastrophic to the nation’s integrity, is the grim fact that the official Nigerian military can be remarkably far from a benevolent protective force at times. One deeply harrowing, highly detailed investigative report in particular, thoroughly published by the international news agency Reuters in 2022, heavily implicated deployed Nigerian soldiers in the highly systemic, widespread use of extreme violence directly against the exact same vulnerable communities currently being victimized by Boko Haram.

That horrific documented abuse explicitly included mass, deeply coercive mandatory abortions forcefully performed on vulnerable women and young girls who were unfortunately impregnated by the terror group’s fighters. It also shockingly detailed the deeply routine, highly systemic extermination of innocent young children who were simply the biological descendants of known Boko Haram fighters or their perceived local allies. Prominent international human rights organizations have thoroughly, meticulously documented a vast array of other severe, systemic abuses perpetrated by official Nigerian state forces.

These deeply troubling reports include heavily verified accounts of highly regular extrajudicial killings, and the deeply widespread, highly systematic use of horrific sexual violence wielded deliberately as a psychological weapon of war. As very recently as 2024, Nigeria’s official military apparatus was heavily accused of systematically detaining innocent civilian mothers and their young children in horrific conditions for multiple consecutive years at a time. This arbitrary, deeply illegal detention was justified solely because of their vaguely perceived, often highly tenuous association with Boko Haram—sometimes due to actual, legitimate familial connections, and very often based strictly on deeply questionable, entirely false, or completely nonexistent intelligence evidence.

In 2023, yet another damning, highly detailed report directly accused the elite Nigerian Air Force of routinely, recklessly conducting highly indiscriminate, massively lethal bombing runs directly against undefended civilian populations in complex areas currently associated with the intractable farmer-herder conflict, the massive ISWAP and Boko Haram insurgencies, and heavily contested regions elsewhere. Military morale across the board is exceptionally low, official accountability is functionally scarce, troop pay is vastly insufficient, and deeply entrenched clan and rigid ideological divides run exceptionally deep through the military’s ranks. After so many brutal, unrelenting years of grueling multidimensional insurgency, virtually everybody currently living in the devastated conflict zones of Nigeria possesses deeply personal, highly bloody scores to settle.

Tragically, this exact reality firmly includes the very deployed state soldiers who are theoretically supposed to be deeply capable of putting those petty personal and highly destructive community grievances permanently aside. The deeply questionable, highly destructive operational conduct of the official Nigerian military is made absolutely all the worse by the deeply systemic fact that there is functionally nobody taking real, accountable charge at the very top. Nigeria’s entrenched military leadership and its broader federal government are fundamentally, deeply corrupt.

This systemic corruption operates in exact, highly specific ways that directly, massively damage the beleaguered country’s baseline institutional ability to actually protect its own deeply vulnerable people. Rank-and-file combat troops are chronically, severely underpaid and dangerously underequipped, specifically because the vital federal money explicitly intended to actually pay for their promised wages and vital combat equipment is systematically, ruthlessly embezzled away by their superiors. Vital military logistical chains are notoriously shaky in the absolute best of peaceful times, and they consistently violently crumble in incredibly short order whenever they inevitably come under coordinated tactical attack by highly capable adversaries that intimately understand the immense strategic value of logistical disruption.

Operational unit commanders routinely lazily pass off their core security responsibilities to poorly trained local civilian militias. High-level strategic leaders then sequentially pass off their own ultimate responsibilities straight down to those same overwhelmed unit commanders, and the nation’s highest political leaders frequently simply decline to fundamentally investigate the very systemic problems they possess the absolute executive power to rapidly address. The failing nation’s deeply entrenched corruption problems fundamentally run far deeper than just the armed military apparatus.

The globally respected organization Transparency International recently ranked Nigeria a dismal 140th out of 180 assessed nations globally in terms of its strict institutional ability to actually control the systemic problem. That deeply pervasive corruption inevitably leads to total institutional atrophy absolutely everywhere across the state infrastructure. It directly makes deeply vulnerable geographic areas currently experiencing severe food shortages, massive public funds misappropriations, chronic administrative negligence, or total infrastructural decay all the more highly likely to inevitably become the next immediate target of further, massive extremist violence.

The embattled nation’s highest political leader is currently deeply unpopular and has faced incredibly heavy, highly sustained public criticism. That undeniable reality simply means that the deeply corrupt, highly entrenched political and economic elites who personally financially benefit from his continued rule—including a very fair, highly significant portion of his own federal government—have very real, deeply compelling personal incentives to actively engage in the exact shady, deeply illicit dealings fundamentally necessary to securely keep him permanently in federal power. And as long as those exact, self-interested elites can securely protect their own core base of political support, typically located in major, highly fortified urban cities like Lagos and Abuja, their overwhelming self-interest simply does not inevitably lead them to actually devote the exact same vital time, resources, and massive systemic effort when it finally comes to adequately protecting the deeply isolated rural communities that are vastly most severely impacted by this massive, existential crisis.

The relatively rare, highly isolated battlefield successes that active Nigerian soldiers actually do occasionally achieve can admittedly often be quite structurally impressive strictly by the raw numerical numbers—but their celebrated tactical victories are almost universally deeply isolated in the absolute best of possible circumstances. For one prominent example, a massive joint military combat operation successfully executed in the highly volatile northwest of the country in mid-April recently resulted in a highly prominent regional bandit leader being officially declared killed along with about a full one hundred of his dedicated fighters and loyal followers. That specific, highly publicized Nigerian operation was a direct, reactive military counterattack, aggressively launched immediately after the bandits had forcefully taken forty-three innocent civilian villagers deep into a remote local forest.

It was concurrently accompanied by the total military destruction of several other established armed bandit camps hidden in the broader area. Yet, despite the highly eye-catching, massive militant death toll, the targeted killings ultimately did exceedingly little to actually tamp down on the massive, everyday extreme violence actively plaguing the surrounding area. Furthermore, there remains a very real, highly distinct operational chance that the specific bandit leader entirely in question was actually not killed at all.

The Nigerian Air Force had previously aggressively declared him definitively dead in 2022 following a highly similar targeted aerial attack, and if he absolutely was not truly dead then, it certainly is not currently definitively assured that he is actually dead right now. This exact same deeply frustrating situation tends to structurally play out again and again, whenever deeply strained Nigerian state forces actually do temporarily seize the tactical initiative and sequentially carry out some limited form of armed military counterattack. Whenever and absolutely wherever that successfully happens, it simply just isn’t fundamentally enough, even if the specific frontline soldiers entirely responsible actually actively carry themselves with all the immense dedication and core professionalism that would typically be highly expected of most functioning modern militaries.

International Apathy and the Trajectory of a Failing State

While the embattled state of Nigeria does currently receive some highly limited forms of international security support, it is frankly not particularly highly effective in meaningfully aiding comprehensive military crackdowns systematically directed against these massive, interconnected threats. Major Western global powers have been deeply, historically hesitant to massively explicitly boost Nigeria’s core military strength, deeply fearing that absolutely any financial funds and advanced military resources they explicitly send will inevitably be systematically exploited by the exact same entrenched cycles of endemic state corruption that have arguably definitively brought the struggling nation directly to this catastrophic point. Nearby regional nations like Niger, Burkina Faso, and Chad inherently have highly complex, deeply fraught geopolitical relationships actively with Nigeria, and they simply are not always politically willing or highly institutionally competent military collaborators when specifically dealing with massively dangerous transnational extremist threats.

To be completely fair to its neighbors, Nigeria absolutely isn’t structurally great at successfully executing complex transnational military operations either; instead, its highly porous sovereign territory has vastly more frequently served as deeply secure, highly reliable safe territory for various armed insurgent groups to safely plan, thoroughly rearm, and aggressively launch massive cross-border terror attacks directly into Chad, Cameroon, and various other highly vulnerable regional neighbors. Russia actively sends some security support directly to Nigeria, and has formally publicly vowed to step that exact security support up, but Russia’s actual logistical ability to meaningfully support heavily embattled security partners deep in Africa is not particularly structurally robust right now. Nor would Moscow’s stated strategic preference to simply send a few shipments of aging military hardware or a deeply limited few hundred active military advisors functionally be the massive, sweeping systemic help that would theoretically successfully dig Nigeria permanently out of its current, deeply catastrophic security predicament.

Finally, while a major, highly prominent Chinese state defense company did very recently officially ink a massive commercial contract strictly with Nigeria to actively produce massive amounts of small arms ammunition, deliberately provide advanced technical military expertise, and directly service failing heavy military equipment, those specific acts of limited industrial assistance are several massive strategic steps severely short of exactly what the failing state of Nigeria would fundamentally truly need in strict order to actually decisively turn the massive, overwhelming tide of militant violence. To officially publicly call a massive sovereign nation a true failed state, or even a rapidly failing state, is an admittedly incredibly bold, highly controversial geopolitical proclamation. At this deeply critical current point, though, it is exceptionally clear to analytically see exactly why serious security observers are deeply comfortable taking that massive analytical leap.

If Nigeria were functionally dealing with absolutely just one or even two of the incredibly many massive simultaneous, highly lethal armed insurgencies it is currently actively fighting, the dire label might strictly not perfectly fit the exact situation. If the besieged nation actually fundamentally possessed a highly competent, deeply reliable, inherently trustworthy federal military apparatus, or was completely currently officially ruled by highly responsible, deeply accountable political actors with genuine personal interests that fundamentally flawlessly align directly with the absolute baseline protection of their deeply vulnerable civilian people, then the bleak label might frankly not seamlessly fit in that specific theoretical case either. If Nigeria could securely confidently rely strictly on a deeply robust, massively well-funded international defense relationship officially with a major, highly committed global international backer, then even if the deeply dire label of a rapidly failing state absolutely did technically fit, it simply might strictly not be currently quite so overwhelmingly immediately relevant to the ultimate survival of the state.

But the tragic reality is that Nigeria is currently dealing simultaneously with so exceptionally many massive, deeply overlapping, and highly dangerous asymmetric armed insurgencies, and they are absolutely all rapidly gaining in deep tactical strength and aggressively violently stepping up the sheer brutal frequency of their coordinated attacks. They are aggressively attacking a massive, deeply vulnerable nation where both the deeply strained military and the much wider, deeply corrupt federal government fundamentally has neither the massive necessary domestic resources nor the highly committed deep-pocketed international patrons to successfully keep them permanently geographically contained. It is a deeply broken security system where both the low-level deployed foot soldiers and the highest-ranking political leaders permanently situated at absolutely every single level of power are instead deeply, perversely financially incentivized to ruthlessly take complete personal advantage of the massive ongoing conflict, strictly in absolute order to systematically personally enrich themselves.

Unfortunately for absolutely all of the people of Nigeria, that specific, highly toxic combination of massive, deeply overlapping systemic institutional problems, coupled tightly with deeply structurally insufficient temporary solutions, is exactly what seems to absolutely definitively promise considerably, massively worse times immediately ahead. To be completely analytically clear, there absolutely are highly specific, deeply structural steps that the official government of Nigeria absolutely can explicitly theoretically take strictly in absolute order to successfully make tangible tactical progress directly on various distinct individual security fronts. In the massive, grueling ongoing battle waged against the powerful jihadists of ISWAP, for one distinct strategic example, the violent jihadists’ relatively new, highly brutal tactical willingness to aggressively violently target undefended civilians—actively coming immediately after several long years of relatively cautiously cultivating good localized public relations—will inevitably systematically leave a massive strategic political opening entirely for the federal Nigerian government to directly legally exploit.

In those specific geographically targeted areas, deployed state troops absolutely can practically theoretically pick up some massive, highly critical intelligence support directly from terrified locals who have been brutally violently spurned by the massive insurgency. In its grueling, highly violent fight strictly against massive networks of armed rural bandits, the state of Nigeria entirely theoretically can actively selectively take its deeply isolated tactical combat successes achieved strictly on the deeply local geographical level strictly as golden strategic opportunities to aggressively systematically collect vital actionable human intelligence. They could relentlessly track down the deep, massive illicit connections of the specific criminal people that Nigerian state forces absolutely have successfully recently legally arrested or violently permanently eliminated, and very slowly, highly methodically structurally firmly work their absolute operational way directly deep into much larger, highly lucrative organized regional criminal smuggling networks.

Where the specific massive geopolitical security influence strictly of China is actively currently strictly directly concerned, the state of Nigeria entirely absolutely theoretically can actively take complete absolute full strategic institutional advantage of brand-new domestic ammunition industrial production facilities, and really highly effectively structurally make incredibly massive tactical strategic use of highly trained foreign tactical and deeply logistical military advisors. But absolutely all of those specific proposed highly targeted solutions are fundamentally deeply severely temporary, localized band-aid solutions explicitly actively strictly meant for a massive, deeply catastrophic systemic national problem that absolutely incredibly desperately structurally fundamentally needs a massive, highly restrictive national strategic tourniquet—and exactly right now, it is entirely definitively strictly not perfectly clear that Nigeria’s deeply entrenched highest political leaders definitively strictly absolutely should realistically inherently actually be strictly trusted to even fundamentally honestly strictly apply the localized band-aid, directly instead of actively inevitably strictly attempting to massively illegally actively corruptly quickly re-sell it on the illicit market and immediately turn a massive, highly illegal personal profit. The sweeping, foundational changes that would definitively set Nigeria on a different trajectory are not particularly likely to materialize.

The nation’s president and his inner political circle are highly unlikely to give up power on principle, especially when they and their established allies in Nigerian society stand to enrich themselves with every passing day they spend in federal office. The nation’s military apparatus has exceedingly few internal incentives to meaningfully crack down on its own severe human rights abuses, specifically when those documented abuses are not only geographically widespread across the armed forces, but actively come with the express endorsement of many high-ranking military leaders. The deeply vulnerable rural communities that have been systematically ravaged by both ruthless insurgent groups and the official Nigerian military are not about to simply forget what the Nigerian state government has ultimately done to them—especially when the military’s past aggressive conduct would vividly seem to empirically prove that state forces are frequently hardly any better than the violent jihadists or the marauding raiders.

And speaking of those entrenched jihadists and raiders, the Nigerian military fundamentally is not logistically able to successfully get to their remote strongholds, even if the high command were perfectly, genuinely willing to attempt the necessary operations. There are simply not enough fight-ready combat troops to reasonably spare in order to comprehensively perform those vital military operations in more than a couple of contested areas at once. Every single additional active-duty soldier that Nigeria strategically commits to one specific element of this highly complex multidimensional conflict is inevitably another trained soldier who definitively is not on hand to successfully deter fatal attacks elsewhere.

And even that bleak tactical calculus assumes that Nigeria’s beleaguered military still inherently possesses any tangible deterrent effect at all—a strategic idea that is exceptionally hard to analytically justify, given these various insurgent groups’ stated, demonstrated willingness to directly, aggressively attack the military head-on. A sovereign nation that deals strictly with a single internal security conflict is not necessarily a failed or failing state. In fact, a nation that successfully manages several internal security conflicts at once is not necessarily a failing state either.

But this is a nation that deals continuously with an overwhelming internal security conflict that it simply cannot seem to stop, where absolutely every single active insurgent group is demonstrably gaining territorial ground. It is a nation where neither the civilian government nor the armed military seems to feel as if it has any compelling, urgent incentives to actually step up their necessary counterinsurgent work, specifically if it comes at the direct expense of their own lucrative financial interests. For the various insurgents, the sheer massive scale of violence, the devastating rate of civilian atrocities, the geographic extent of land capture, and the overall tactical ability to successfully achieve their violent goals are all rapidly escalating.

Absolutely nothing about Nigeria’s entrenched political or federal security apparatus is currently rising to adequately meet that existential challenge. If anything, the nation’s official military actively appears to be in a terminal state of rapid institutional decay, while its civilian government remains transparent exclusively about its unrelenting desire for blatant, unchecked self-enrichment. All the while, it is the millions of ordinary, completely unarmed people who are violently trampled by aggressive armed forces on absolutely all sides.

Yet even that massive, ongoing scale of human destruction tragically does not currently seem to be fundamentally enough to motivate the state of Nigeria to successfully step up. As of now, absolutely all strategic indicators explicitly point to a Nigeria completely on the absolute brink. It is not just a massive nation that is critically unequipped to adequately deal with the severe asymmetric challenges it currently faces, but rather a sovereign state that is systemically, intrinsically unable to successfully break itself completely out of a deeply entrenched, highly self-destructive cycle.

Until, and entirely unless, that fundamental reality drastically changes, Nigeria must be clearly, objectively understood as a rapidly failing nation. However, an important caveat remains: a massive nation simply cannot be in the active process of failing forever. Sooner or later, fragile nations locked in a systemic freefall will inevitably hit an absolute, catastrophic rock bottom.

Thus, it remains an imperative hope that Nigeria, along

Frequently Asked Questions

How bad is poverty in Nigeria, and why does it fuel the insurgencies?

As of 2024, 56 percent of Nigerians — approximately 129 million people — live below the national poverty line, with absolute poverty rates especially high in the northern regions and deeply rural areas. These are precisely the areas where insurgencies like Boko Haram and ISWAP have taken firmest root. Food insecurity is common, economic opportunity is scarce, inflation is punishingly high, and two-thirds of all Nigerians are under 25 at a time when viable jobs for young people are increasingly rare — conditions that make violent non-state actors easier to recruit for.

What is ISWAP and how does it differ from Boko Haram?

The Islamic State – West Africa Province (ISWAP) originated as a splinter from Boko Haram in 2016. It operates across the wider Sahel, building a network of Islamic State branches, and has won a long series of tactical victories against the Nigerian military. Unlike Boko Haram, it initially tried to cultivate local goodwill in areas it controlled, though it has recently dropped that approach and begun attacking civilian groups with the same frequency as other jihadist insurgencies. ISWAP has become highly proficient at coordinated nighttime assaults on military camps and is increasingly skilled with bomb-dropping drones.

What is driving the deadly conflict between farmers and herders in Nigeria’s Middle Belt?

At its core, the conflict is a resource war. Long-lasting droughts and aggressive desertification have dramatically reduced viable arable land, bringing nomadic Fulani herders and sedentary farming communities into violent contact over the same shrinking territory. While the conflict has a religious dimension and has been officially classified as a genocide against Christians by Genocide Watch since 2022, religion is often a convenient pretext for fundamentally territorial and economic violence. Large-scale village massacres are relatively common, and the Nigerian military has consistently failed to respond in time or with any tactical effectiveness.

Why is the Nigerian military unable to contain the violence?

Nigeria’s 230,000 active-duty troops are spread across an enormous country facing simultaneous insurgencies, leaving them unable to rapidly deploy in sufficient numbers to any single front. They are chronically under-resourced, struggle to get heavy weapons or air support when needed, and operate at a permanent information disadvantage against highly mobile asymmetric adversaries. Compounding this, a 2022 Reuters investigation implicated soldiers in mass coercive abortions and the extermination of children of suspected Boko Haram fighters, and other human rights organisations have documented widespread extrajudicial killings and sexual violence by state forces.

Why does the international community do so little to help Nigeria?

Major Western powers are deeply reluctant to boost Nigeria’s military, fearing that funds and equipment will be siphoned off by the same endemic corruption that has helped bring the country to this point. Neighbouring states like Niger, Burkina Faso, and Chad have complex, fraught relationships with Nigeria and are not reliable military partners. Russia offers some support but lacks the logistical capacity for meaningful intervention deep in Africa. A Chinese defence company has signed a contract to produce ammunition and service equipment for Nigeria, but that falls far short of the sweeping systemic help the country actually needs.

Sources

1. https://freedomhouse.org/country/nigeria/freedom-world/2025#PR
2. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/nigeria
3. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria
4. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-68402662
5. https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/poverty/987B9C90-CB9F-4D93-AE8C-750588BF00QA/current/Global_POVEQ_NGA.pdf
6. https://www.theafricareport.com/365284/more-than-half-of-nigerians-live-in-poverty-says-world-bank/
7. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/nigeria
8. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/03/taking-action-against-corruption-nigeria
9. https://www.unodc.org/conig/uploads/documents/Corruption_Survey_2019.pdf
10. https://acleddata.com/2024/04/16/a-decade-after-chibok-assessing-nigerias-regional-response-to-boko-haram/
11. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria/fighting-among-boko-haram-splinters-rages
12. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violent-extremism-sahel
13. https://apnews.com/article/nigeria-boko-haram-borno-conflict-damasak-1eb22e035f0d01cdfe7345f93ea122b6
14. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria/b196-jas-vs-iswap-war-boko-haram-splinters
15. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5140607
16. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/boko-haram-factional-violence-worries-islamic-state
17. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-the-islamic-state-in-west-africa-province-is-growing-in-strength-and-sophistication/
18. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria/nigeria-how-solve-problem-biafra
19. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/04/07/unfinished-business-biafran-activism-in-nigeria-today/
20. https://theconversation.com/nigerias-security-problems-deepen-as-anglophone-insurgency-in-cameroon-spills-across-border-223078
21. https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2017/02/13/oil-and-violence-in-the-niger-delta-isnt-talked-about-much-but-it-has-a-global-impact/?sh=532d63f54dc6
22. https://www.cfr.org/blog/nigerian-government-threatens-use-hammer-south-east
23. https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/UNIDIR_MEAC_Banditry_Brief.pdf
24. https://africacenter.org/spotlight/spiraling-criminal-gang-violence-in-north-west-nigeria-causing-displacements-and-diminished-government-control/
25. https://liberties.aljazeera.com/en/northwest-nigeria-a-region-under-siege-by-violence-and-despair/
26. https://theglobalobservatory.org/2024/05/northwest-nigeria-has-a-banditry-problem-whats-driving-it/
27. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria/halting-deepening-turmoil-nigerias-north-west
28. https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/dont-call-it-farmer-herder-conflict/
29. https://africacenter.org/publication/growing-complexity-farmer-herder-conflict-west-central-africa/
30. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/what-journalists-should-know-about-farmer-herder-crisis-nigeria
31. https://nigeriaclimate.crisisgroup.org/
32. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/gunmen-kill-least-52-people-nigerias-plateau-state-2025-04-07/
33. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/least-51-killed-another-attack-nigerias-plateau-state-2025-04-14/
34. https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20250512-23-killed-in-multiple-attacks-by-gunmen-in-central-nigeria-says-red-cross
35. https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20250420-gunmen-kill-at-least-56-people-in-central-nigeria
36. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/04/15/attackers-central-nigeria/
37. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/04/14/dozens-killed-in-nigeria-attack-as-president-tinubu-vows-crackdown_6740220_4.html
38. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250416-none-spared-in-nigeria-gun-machete-massacre-survivors
39. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0kxxg5jy0ro
40. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/deadly-boko-haram-attack-kills-57-leaves-70-missing-in-nigerias-villages/articleshow/121258923.cms
41. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/05/18/nigeria-attack-militant-boko-haram-islamic-state/ce4778f0-3419-11f0-9c9e-0db2d748bea7_story.html
42. https://dailytrust.com/boko-haram-insurgents-bow-to-superior-firepower-of-zulums-convoy/
43. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/28/fears-boko-haram-comeback-stir-nigeria-maiduguri
44. https://www.dw.com/en/nigeria-farmers-killed-in-suspected-boko-haram-attack/a-71287087
45. https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/articles/cdj9gy2gykmo
46. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/militants-kill-5-soldiers-attacks-two-nigerian-bases-security-sources-say-2025-05-13/
47. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/nigerian-military-says-it-killed-16-boko-haram-terrorists-in-northeastern-borno-state/3577768
48. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250325-boko-haram-fighters-kill-20-cameroonian-troops-sources
49. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/africa-file-may-15-2025-jnim-seizes-burkinabe-provincial-capital-latest-blow-traor%C3%A9
50. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-may-21/
51. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/least-22-killed-weekend-attacks-nigerias-northeast-2025-04-28/
52. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/africa-file-april-24-2025-jnim%E2%80%99s-growing-pressure-benin-turkey-somalia-salafi-jihadi
53. https://gnet-research.org/2025/03/07/mapping-the-enemy-mobilising-the-future-surveillance-and-recruitment-strategies-of-lakurawa-terror-group-in-nigeria/
54. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/gunmen-kill-30-travellers-nigerias-unstable-southeast-amnesty-says-2025-05-09/
55. https://www.tv360nigeria.com/police-blame-ipob-as-gunmen-kill-15-in-imo-highway-attack/
56. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/05/11/gunmen-kill-three-nigeria/
57. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/residents-say-gunmen-kill-least-20-people-mining-village-nigerias-zamfara-state-2025-04-25/
58. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/armed-bandits-kill-19-rustle-livestock-northeast-nigeria-2025-05-05/
59. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/11/bandits-in-nigeria-ambush-and-kill-21-government-backed-fighters
60. https://www.barrons.com/news/bandits-kill-15-farmers-in-latest-nigeria-attack-42e18c2c
61. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c15vwgjp0pqo
62. https://www.ft.com/content/3c3e579a-5538-486e-bab3-9023c85934e4
63. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/10/tackling-judicial-bribery-and-procurement-fraud-nigeria
64. https://www.cfr.org/article/nigerias-all-too-familiar-corruption-ranking-begs-broader-questions-around-normative
65. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/section/nigeria-military/
66. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/13/reports-allege-nigerian-army-abuses
67. https://apnews.com/article/nigeria-military-boko-haram-human-rights-68afedcc76e270543875267d2d0b41a2
68. https://www.semafor.com/article/06/11/2024/nigerian-army-faces-new-abuse-allegations-as-it-battles-boko-haram-insurgency
69. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/nigeria-military-civilian-airstrikes/
70. https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/markets/china-expands-military-supply-pact-in-africa-with-new-nigeria-deal/fmc9q97?tpcc=africa_brief&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Africa%20Brief%2005212025&utm_term=africa_brief
71. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/nigeria-niger-sign-security-deal-despite-rift-since-coup-2024-08-29/
72. https://theconversation.com/why-burkina-faso-mali-and-nigers-new-plan-to-tackle-extremist-violence-is-likely-to-fail-248277
73. https://www.military.africa/2025/05/nigeria-russia-deepens-military-cooperations/
74. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/least-20000-flee-insurgency-hit-town-nigeria-governor-says-2025-05-19/
75. https://ti-defence.org/nigeria-news-jersey-bank-account-seized-boko-haram-corruption/
76. https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/documentary-reveals-low-morale-in-nigerian-army
77. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-end-of-iswap-s-hearts-and-minds-strategy