Putin's Death and the Future of Global Flashpoints

Geopolitical analysis requires navigating a complex web of global conflicts, assessing the accuracy of intelligence, and forecasting the fallout of sudden leadership changes. Analysts continuously evaluate global flashpoints, ranging from the potential power vacuum in Russia to the tragically underreported devastation in Sudan. Examining these ongoing crises involves a rigorous assessment of bureaucratic processes, intelligence sourcing, and the strategic direction of international relations. This comprehensive review addresses some of the most pressing questions regarding global security, the likelihood of regional rebellions across Latin America, and the methodologies used to dissect modern warfare.

The Succession Struggle: What Happens if Vladimir Putin Dies?

A surprise demise for Russian President Vladimir Putin would create an immediate power vacuum at the center of the Russian state, and one that probably would not resolve easily. At this time, Putin has no clear, chosen, publicly agreed successor. He has systematically used his lack of a successor to keep the members of his inner circle uneasy, distracted, and at times at each other’s throats.

By turning them all against each other, Putin can ensure they are too busy to gang up on him. The battle for succession is therefore likely to be an internal one, fought among the best-positioned rivals at the top of the Russian hierarchy, with only minimal involvement by the Russian public. After decades of Putin in charge, Russians are well-accustomed to life under his specific social contract.

In exchange for reliable access to goods and services, protection from domestic and socioeconomic turmoil, and a relative absence of the government in everyday Russian life, ordinary citizens are expected to stay out of politics. That dynamic will almost certainly remain stable immediately after Putin’s death. At this point, the few surviving entities that could foster political organization among ordinary people are too badly atrophied to be of value.

Instead, the person who seizes the mantle will probably do it by way of internal Kremlin politicking, backstabbing, and Machiavellian manipulation. The eventual victor will likely emerge from a specific pool of insiders. Russia’s Prime Minister, Mikhail Mishustin, will become interim leader by default if Putin dies in office.

While very much a part of Russia’s power structure, Mishustin has been a quiet opponent to many of Putin’s war moves in Ukraine while working to handle the fallout, making him a potentially appealing alternative for leaders who have lost faith in Putin’s overall vision. The mayor of Moscow, Sergei Sobyanin, is frequently identified as a likely contender due to his ability to keep Moscow in relatively good shape. Ex-President Dmitry Medvedev served as a placeholder from 2008 to 2012 and as Prime Minister through 2020, though his confrontational approach to the West and puppet-like perception make him a controversial choice.

Nikolai Patrushev came up through the KGB and led Russia’s security council until 2024, but his waning position suggests his son may be a more likely successor. Other potential replacements include Defense Minister Andrei Belousov, Chief of Staff Sergei Kiriyenko, his deputy Dmitry Kozak, and Putin’s former bodyguard, Alexei Dyumin. Observers also cannot rule out Chechen dictator Ramzan Kadyrov or the Butcher of Mariupol, Mikhail Mizintsev, though they would likely need to take power by force.

Naming contenders only tells half the story; the real question is how bloody the transition might get as these self-serving actors attempt to secure the best fortunes possible. This does not necessarily guarantee a twelve-way sprint to the presidency, as some prominent figures will ally with others. However, several will be in play, leveraging power bases across civil institutions, the military, and organized crime.

With Putin dead, the rules governing the Kremlin are gone. Those who act quickest, with the best-laid plans and a willingness to be cutthroat, will gain the upper hand. Changing Russia will be a slow affair.

The war in Ukraine is unlikely to end immediately, and longtime allies will not be abandoned quickly. The slow Russian bureaucracy must be heaved in new directions, like pulling around the prow of a tall ship with a single rope. Ten years after a sudden Putin demise, Russia might be very different, but one year after his death, it will probably look pretty much the same.

The Challenges of Forecasting: Assessing Geopolitical Predictions

One of the most awkward elements of geopolitical analysis is that incorrect predictions remain permanently in the public sphere. While analytical forecasting often hits the mark, certain assessments inevitably fail to stand the test of time. In October 2023, analysts evaluated the possibility of a wider war in the Middle East following the devastating attack on Israel by Hamas.

Although the assessment that Iran was not about to directly attack Israel turned out to be correct, a separate assessment regarding Hezbollah’s capabilities was astonishingly wide of the mark. Warnings at the time suggested that Israeli strikes on Lebanon could lead to a war with a heavily armed Hezbollah capable of doing untold damage to Israel. Instead, when the conflict between the Israel Defense Forces and Hezbollah finally ignited, it was a highly asymmetrical affair.

Exploding pagers and walkie-talkies took out many high-ranking members, while a concentrated bombing campaign effectively decapitated Hezbollah’s leadership. The conflict proved catastrophic for the militant group; top leaders were assassinated, many fighters were killed, and much of its arsenal was destroyed. By the end of November, the battered organization agreed to a ceasefire that was essentially a surrender.

Such analytical misses often stem from a lack of behind-the-scenes information, such as the covert distribution of secret bombs by Mossad to thousands of Hezbollah members. Similar intelligence gaps have led to inaccurate forecasts in other theaters of war. In the summer of 2024, analysts predicted that the Rapid Support Forces would successfully push the Sudanese army back to their stronghold on the coast.

Mere weeks later, the military launched a counteroffensive that ejected the RSF from much of central and southern Sudan. Observers missed the secret influx of Iranian weapons flowing to the army, as well as the backroom deals military leadership made with other armed groups to join forces against the genocidal RSF. In other instances, despite good access to public domain information, analysts simply made the wrong call.

After Ukraine’s misguided invasion of Kursk, predictions indicated that the strategic town of Pokrovsk in the Donbas would fall to Russian forces due to a lack of defenders. As of the time of writing, the Pokrovsk front remains stable in Ukrainian hands. Conversely, diligent analysis occasionally identifies critical trends that the broader international community ignores.

In September 2023, analysts called the takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh by Azerbaijan less than 24 hours before it happened. Positive signals coming from Azerbaijan regarding lifting their blockade were correctly identified as phony, and President Ilham Aliyev’s guarantees not to take the enclave by force were heavily distrusted. Combined with knowledge that previous Azeri moves often happened in the fall while the world was distracted, a sudden attack was correctly anticipated.

Another major forecasting success occurred in September 2024, predicting the Syrian civil war was about to restart nearly two months before a loose coalition of groups overthrew Bashar al-Assad. While most media narratives falsely claimed the civil war had ended with a government victory, independent analysis correctly called a return to fighting based on shaky regional foundations.

Flashpoints of Rebellion: Analyzing Unrest in Latin America

Evaluating the likelihood of widespread revolutions in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela requires parsing highly nuanced economic and political environments. The prospect of an immediate revolution in these Latin American nations is not particularly likely, but it is certainly not impossible. Venezuela currently registers as the most likely to see a large-scale rebellion, followed by Cuba, with Nicaragua sitting in last place.

Venezuela’s ongoing state of unrest is driven by an economic collapse so severe that it continually blasts through seemingly rock-bottom barriers into entirely new layers of socioeconomic hell. Citizens face severe scarcities of basic goods, riots are common, and millions of Venezuelans have been forced to emigrate despite hardly any prospects elsewhere. The nation’s sham election in 2024 highlighted both the scale of the problem and the public’s inclination to speak out.

When a government-controlled electoral authority declared dictator Nicolas Maduro the winner, defying demands from Latin America, the US, and the EU to review opposition data, Venezuelans took to the streets in massive waves of protest. While those protests failed to oust Maduro and have since died down, it is widely regarded as the dismal end of the last-chance opportunity to force a return to democracy through institutional levers. The pro-democracy movement is not finished, but its tactics will need to change dramatically to have any hope of success.

Currently, there lacks a clear path to arm and organize ordinary Venezuelans, but the political will remains palpable. Cuba is in a somewhat different situation. After decades of stagnation, the nation’s economy has collapsed.

Citizens have lost opportunities to work abroad, inequality between people with family abroad and those without has grown to a staggering degree, and the island suffers frequent and total blackouts of the electrical grid. These blackouts exacerbate problems caused by natural disasters and systemic shortages. The reaction of the Cuban people, however, lacks the forceful momentum seen in Venezuela.

Although localized protests occasionally take place in response to power outages and food shortages, they are rare and fail to sustain into larger movements. The Cuban secret police remain highly active, and the government successfully redirects public anger toward the United States for imposing crippling sanctions that clearly worsen the situation. In Nicaragua, the situation is horrific.

The nation saw years of organized protests against dictator Daniel Ortega starting in 2014, renewing in 2018, and restarting in 2021 when Ortega won a sham election. After surviving that wave of protests, the Ortega regime transitioned from the authoritarian to the totalitarian. The instruments of regime power reach into places where citizens actively try to keep them out, making it impossible to safely plan mass organization.

The government cracked down specifically on universities, journalists, and other centers of criticism to the point they are hardly able to function. The regime brazenly targets and publicly attacks political dissenters, converting traditionally non-state-affiliated organizations into centers of control. Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo have instituted such a comprehensive stranglehold that a mass protest could scarcely survive long enough to become a revolution.

The Strategic Blind Spot: The Global Implications of Sudan’s Civil War

Among the multitude of global conflicts, the war in Sudan represents a catastrophic media and geopolitical blind spot. Kicking off on April 15, 2023, the civil war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces is easily one of the worst conflicts the world has seen in decades. The fighting has turned Africa’s third-largest country into a post-apocalyptic wasteland.

The capital of Khartoum is a burned-out shell, agricultural lands have been torched to trigger a growing famine, a genocide is underway in Darfur, and 12 million people have been forced to flee their homes. Because the fighting is so total and chaotic, few know exactly how many have died. In May 2024, Washington’s Sudan envoy gave a rough estimate of 150,000 killed, while the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine suggested that 26,000 had died in the capital alone by last summer.

In Darfur, new mass graves continually appear on satellite imagery. For all the horrors it contains, Sudan’s war gets a fraction of the coverage afforded to other conflicts. In May 2024, the analytics firm Chartbeat evaluated six conflicts by the number of global media stories.

Ukraine and Gaza appeared in over 100,000 news stories a month, and Yemen featured in up to 40,000 stories. By contrast, Sudan generated just 600 news stories a month. This makes it the very definition of underreported.

Furthermore, Sudan sits along several global fault lines of massive importance. As The Economist notes, it borders seven already-fragile states, accounting for over a fifth of Africa’s landmass. South Sudan is actively plunging into its own civil war after the suspension of oil exports across its northern neighbor crashed the local economy.

More directly, the tactical maneuvers within Sudan risk drawing in neighboring powers. One of Sudan’s top generals recently threatened to bomb neighboring Chad for allowing an airbase to be used as a resupply point for the RSF. Crucially, Sudan’s 800-kilometer Red Sea coastline offers whoever controls it massive power over global trade.

A hostile force stationed there could cut off trade through the Suez Canal far more effectively than the Houthis in Yemen. Right now, both Russia and Iran are vying to become that hostile force. After initially backing the RSF, the Kremlin is pivoting to the army, while a recent influx of Iranian weapons helped the Sudanese military get on the front foot for the first time in nearly two years.

Sudan’s fate is deeply important for the wider world, particularly Europe, which stands to receive another massive wave of refugees if the nation utterly collapses. The media void is often attributed to theories that The Guardian recently hypothesized as fatigue with bloodshed. The international development organization Bond pointed out through a roundtable with journalists that editors are wary of commissioning pieces that readers will not click on.

Putting Sudan in a headline often leads to underperforming metrics. However, even if the world is content to ignore Sudan, the fighting possesses the profound ability to impact the lives of people across the globe, demanding much more strategic attention.

Evaluating Intelligence: Navigating Bias in Urban Warfare

Analyzing intensely polarized conflicts, particularly the Israel-Hamas War, requires rigorous scrutiny of source reliability and an acute awareness of institutional bias. Every intelligence source and media outlet operates with inherent biases; truly unbiased reporting simply does not exist. A person’s best attempt at presenting something objectively is inevitably informed by their own biases regarding how they interpret the presence of bias.

Responsible geopolitical analysis actively works to minimize the impact of these biases by avoiding clearly preferential sources. Outlets like Al Jazeera or the Jerusalem Post are generally not relied upon for primary intelligence regarding that conflict unless their specific claims are corroborated by multiple other trusted outlets. When evaluating complex urban warfare narratives, analysts prioritize sources that make a clear, transparent, and consistent effort toward objectivity, verified by independent media evaluators.

Sources with robust, well-funded global news bureaus, extensive relationships on the ground, and a track record spanning the ideological spectrum are foundational for accurate analysis. However, the fundamental analytical framework for covering conflicts like the Israel-Hamas War rests on acknowledging precisely one objective demographic of innocence: innocent civilians, especially children, caught in the middle of wars that do not represent their interests. Every armed faction in every conflict must be approached as a self-interested actor rather than an agent of good or evil.

Framing armed actors purely as good or evil is directly counterproductive to understanding their operational tactics. An armed faction perceived as good can commit heinous acts with impunity from their supporters, while the strategic motivations of a faction perceived as evil are frequently ignored. Factions can do things that are incredibly good or apocalyptically bad, but they must be judged through their actions.

When a faction engages in terrible conduct, it is vital to understand and account for their tactical justifications without ever excusing the atrocity itself. In the Israel-Hamas War, Hamas, allied armed groups, the coalition government of Benjamin Netanyahu, and the Israel Defense Forces have all regularly engaged in conduct described by independent observers as despicable under international law. When a faction abducts hundreds of civilians and keeps them captive as hostages for negotiating leverage, it commits a terrible act.

Similarly, when a faction justifies the deaths of thousands of civilians in the name of retrieving those hostages, that too is a terrible act. Engaging in regular airstrikes where civilian families live, hiding military assets among civilians to use them as human shields, and shooting through those human shields to eliminate an enemy are all severe violations. The historical grievances driving the conflict are profoundly personal, prompting audiences to entrench their stances on who the good and bad guys are.

However, objective conflict analysis demands charting the facts without excusing wartime atrocities simply because an actor feels they have a righteous justification. Neither side in any war, from Ukraine and Myanmar to Sudan and Gaza, gets an analytical pass for crimes against humanity.

The Specter of Aggression: Forecasting Russia’s Next Strategic Targets

A critical question dominating European defense policy is identifying which country Vladimir Putin is likely to target first if war breaks out on the European continent outside Ukraine due to Russian aggression. For frontline states bordering Russia, this represents an incredibly important assessment. Formulating an answer requires outlining the specific circumstances of Russia expanding its war and deciphering the Kremlin’s ultimate goals.

The strategic calculus alters drastically depending on the timeline’s recent history. For instance, if a shaky ceasefire takes hold in Ukraine along today’s line of contact and holds for at least five years, Russia would have the necessary time to reconstitute its battered army. If that theoretical ceasefire includes NATO guarantees for Ukraine, a renewed Russian attack would risk a much wider war.

Putin would either need to direct his colonial ambitions elsewhere or decide to force a direct showdown with NATO. If the Kremlin gambles that a European NATO is disunited and unwilling to risk nuclear war for the sake of a smaller member, the most likely targets are the Baltic States. If Moscow believes a show of overwhelming force is the key to forcing NATO to back down, the primary target is likely Lithuania, specifically the Suwalki Gap.

Stretching fewer than 100 kilometers, the Gap is bordered in the east by Russian ally Belarus and in the west by the exclave of Kaliningrad. A lightning offensive across the Gap could isolate Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia entirely. This vulnerability led Politico to name the Suwalki Gap the most dangerous place on Earth in 2022.

However, a massive show of force risks an immediate NATO counterattack, as Poland is certain to respond aggressively along its northeastern border. Consequently, there is another highly plausible possibility: the Kremlin could resort to gray zone tactics and so-called salami slicing. Under this method, Russia would move fast but over a limited geographical distance, calculating that ordinary voters in Germany, France, and Britain will not risk all-out war over one small town.

Russia might stage a provocation, seize a small ethnically Russian pocket like Narva in Estonia, and threaten a nuclear strike against any attempt to retake it. This tactic, bearing strong similarities to the annexation of Crimea in 2014, would be designed to destabilize the Baltic States to the point of near-collapse through persistent, localized intimidation. Conversely, if the United States maintains firm transatlantic commitments, Putin may play it safe by attacking a former part of the USSR that is not in NATO and remains highly vulnerable.

Russia and Georgia already fought a five-day war in 2008 that resulted in Russian occupation of South Ossetia, placing Kremlin tanks merely 60 kilometers from the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. Should a new war kick off, Russian armor could be in the capital within 90 minutes. Similarly, in a worst-case scenario where Ukraine falls entirely, Moldova becomes a prime target that the Russian war machine could gobble up with barely a second thought.

While strategic forecasting outlines these probabilities, the exact nature of future Russian aggression remains highly contingent on the shifting realities of the modern battlefield.

The Analyst’s Burden: Maintaining Focus Amidst Global Crises

Tracking the vast array of global conflicts requires analysts to navigate the intense psychological toll of documenting continuous warfare. The transition from pure historiographic retrospectives toward real-time current events journalism was driven heavily by the rapid acceleration of major global crises. Pivotal moments, such as the ill-fated march on Moscow by the Wagner Group and the subsequent period when Yevgeny Prigozhin and his plane fell out of the sky, fundamentally altered the operational tempo of global intelligence tracking.

Generating rapid, accurate analysis of developing situations in places like Haiti, China, and the events of October 7 demanded a complete reorganization of analytical resources to meet the pressing need for current situational awareness. Monitoring underreported wars often stretches the operational capacity of intelligence desks. Analysts dedicate significant effort to highlighting conflicts absent from mainstream media diets, such as the insurgency in Burkina Faso, the slide towards civil war in South Sudan, Venezuela’s provocations against Guyana, and Ecuador’s internal armed conflict with cartels.

However, resource constraints and the relentless news cycle occasionally result in critical omissions. The unrest in Mozambique, despite protests beginning in October, and the deadly protests in Senegal in 2023 were initially overlooked due to sheer bandwidth limitations. The most egregious miss involved failing to cover the outbreak of fighting in Sudan until months after it erupted.

The massive volume of incoming crisis data frequently forces a painful triage. At the time the RSF and SAF started clashing in Khartoum, analysts were actively drowned in a sea of news sweeping out of Ukraine, including the apocalyptic climax of the Battle of Bakhmut. Simultaneously, intelligence desks were juggling the developing civil war in Myanmar and the complex political fights over Finland and Sweden joining NATO.

Whether an organization can cover a specific war often depends on the fundamental bandwidth of its writers and their personal drive to spotlight ignored conflicts. Passionate advocacy within research teams ensures consistent coverage of lesser-known crises in places like Ecuador, Ethiopia, and Syria, providing deeper insight than traditional cable news networks. To manage the relentless exposure to systemic state collapse and wartime atrocities, analysts frequently employ specific compartmentalization techniques.

Behind the scenes, the daily soundtrack of a geopolitical researcher provides a vital psychological buffer. For some, immersing in the energetic rhythms of late-1980s Madchester club tracks, specifically the Happy Mondays hits Step On or Loose Fit, serves as the perfect auditory antidote to endlessly writing about war crimes. For others, the complex instrumental precision of modern math rock acts like Polyphia, Plini, and David Maxim Micic, or the grounding melodies of the Irish folk-rock group Kingfishr, offer an essential mental reset.

These vital respites enable researchers to maintain the sharp, objective focus required to dissect the world’s most devastating geopolitical flashpoints.

Frequently Asked Questions

What would happen to Russia if Vladimir Putin died suddenly?

A sudden Putin death would create an immediate power vacuum with no clear, publicly designated successor. Putin has deliberately withheld naming one to keep his inner circle divided and off-balance. The succession battle would almost certainly be an internal Kremlin affair rather than a public election. Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin would become interim leader by default, but the real contest would unfold among a pool of insiders including Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, ex-president Dmitry Medvedev, ex-security council head Nikolai Patrushev, and defense officials like Andrei Belousov and Sergei Kiriyenko, with some more extreme figures like Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov potentially seeking power by force.

Why do intelligence analysts sometimes get major predictions badly wrong?

Analysts miss because critical information is frequently concealed in classified covert operations. The most striking example discussed is the assessment that Hezbollah was a formidable force capable of doing untold damage to Israel — a call that collapsed when exploding pagers and walkie-talkies distributed secretly by Mossad decapitated Hezbollah’s leadership before a conventional fight could unfold. Similarly, a prediction that the Rapid Support Forces would push Sudan’s army back was overturned when a secret influx of Iranian weapons and backroom deals with armed factions reversed the battlefield almost overnight. Access to public-domain intelligence simply cannot reveal what hidden operations are underway.

Which Latin American country is most at risk of a major rebellion, and why?

Venezuela ranks highest, ahead of Cuba and Nicaragua. Its economy has collapsed so completely that it keeps breaking through what seemed like rock-bottom conditions, citizens face severe shortages of basic goods, and millions have emigrated. The 2024 sham election, in which dictator Nicolas Maduro was declared the winner despite mass opposition, triggered huge street protests that — while ultimately suppressed — demonstrated the scale of public anger. The pro-democracy movement lacks a clear path to arm and organize, but the political will for change remains stronger there than in the other two countries.

Why does the Sudan civil war receive so little media coverage despite its scale?

Despite an estimated 150,000 deaths, 12 million displaced, an active genocide in Darfur, and a burned-out capital in Khartoum, Sudan generated only about 600 global news stories per month in May 2024, compared to over 100,000 each for Ukraine and Gaza. Analysts attribute this to editor decisions driven by click metrics — “Sudan” in a headline consistently underperforms — and to the simple bandwidth problem that the war erupted while newsrooms were saturated with the Battle of Bakhmut, Myanmar’s civil war, and the NATO expansion fights. Yet Sudan’s 800-kilometer Red Sea coastline means whoever controls it could throttle global trade through the Suez Canal far more effectively than the Houthis in Yemen.

If Russia expands its war after Ukraine, which country or region is most at risk?

The analysis points to the Suwalki Gap in Lithuania as the most dangerous flashpoint. This corridor of fewer than 100 kilometers is bordered on the east by Russian ally Belarus and on the west by the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad; a lightning offensive there could isolate Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania entirely. If the Kremlin prefers subtler tactics, it might attempt salami-slicing — seizing a small ethnically Russian pocket like Narva in Estonia and threatening nuclear retaliation against any attempt to retake it, mirroring the Crimea annexation playbook. If the US maintains strong transatlantic commitments, Russia might instead target non-NATO former Soviet states, with Georgia and Moldova named as the most vulnerable candidates.

Sources

1. https://sceeus.se/en/publications/what-is-behind-the-myth-of-putins-contract/
2. https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/putin-unlikely-demobilize-event-ceasefire-because-he-afraid-his-veterans
3. https://theweek.com/feature/briefing/1024619/putins-potential-successors
4. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/evidence-suggests-putin-not-grooming-alexei-dyumin-his-successor
5. https://www.politico.eu/article/after-putin-12-people-ready-ruin-russia-next/
6. https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-successors-president-election-kremlin-58154b1f252908e76083c944efc6828e
7. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/instability-venezuela
8. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-48121148
9. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/04/venezuela-brutal-crackdown-protesters-voters
10. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/venezuela-crisis
11. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/why-situation-cuba-deteriorating
12. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/nicaragua
13. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/11/1156741
14. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2023/03/17/nicaragua-on-the-brink-protests-elections-and-mass-atrocity/
15. https://www.dw.com/en/cuba-thousands-protest-against-us-trade-sanctions/a-71135477
16. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/amid-blackouts-scarce-food-cuba-protests-rattle-cradle-revolution-2024-03-27/
17. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/cuba-still-largely-without-power-after-nationwide-grid-collapse-2025-03-15/
18. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/08/27/cuba-is-facing-its-worst-social-crisis-since-the-collapse-of-the-soviet-bloc_6722133_4.html
19. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/08/29/why-sudans-catastrophic-war-is-the-worlds-problem
20. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/13/ignore-sudan-off-peril-devastation-global-consequences
21. https://www.bond.org.uk/news/2025/01/sudan-the-media-challenge/
22. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2024/05/24/sudan-the-war-the-world-forgot