Operation Gideon's Chariots and the Escalating Crisis in Gaza

The crisis in the Gaza Strip is growing significantly darker and more ruinous than it has been at any prior point in the ongoing conflict. For nearly two years running, the Israel-Hamas War has captured the world’s attention, ravaged the Palestinian territory of Gaza, claimed an estimated fifty thousand lives or more, and proved to be among the most controversial and polarizing conflicts in recent global history. A massive Israeli clearing operation is now underway, intended to expel the Palestinian population from nearly the entire Gaza Strip. Bombing raids are constant, there has hardly been any food or medicine available for months, and all indicators suggest this crisis will only continue to deteriorate.

Operation Gideon’s Chariots and the New Ground Offensive

On Sunday, May 18th, the Israel Defense Forces announced the start of extensive ground operations in the Gaza Strip. As warplanes thundered overhead and dropped explosive munitions onto populated areas, Israel’s long-awaited endgame officially got underway. This new offensive, known as Operation Gideon’s Chariots, was approved by the Israeli government in early May.

It comprises massive assaults by land, sea, and air, with the stated objective of ending the Israel-Hamas War once and for all. Over the course of the operation, the IDF intends to defeat Hamas outright, dismantle its military capabilities and its institutions of civil governance, and take direct control over the entirety of the Gaza Strip. Concurrently, Israeli forces plan to move civilians into tightly controlled zones where Hamas fighters and sympathizers can be systematically filtered out.

Critically, according to statements from Israeli officials themselves, the release of Israel’s remaining living hostages in Gaza and the recovery of the remains of hostages who have been killed is no longer treated as a top priority. Instead, IDF troops have been ordered to surge into the Gaza Strip in massive numbers, destroy all the buildings, homes, and human infrastructure that remains, and bury Hamas—both literally and metaphorically—in the rubble. The operation initially got underway two days prior to the official announcement, when the IDF advanced on the central Gazan city of Deir al-Balah for the first time since the start of the war.

From that position, the IDF began massive clearing operations in several locations at once, moving infantry divisions and heavy armor into zones near Rafah, Khan Younis, and Gaza City. According to recent satellite imagery, large parts of those cities have already been reduced to rubble by relentless Israeli bombing campaigns. Now, according to reports from within the IDF itself, Israeli troops are moving through that rubble, block by block, with a few key tactical objectives.

They will clear out any areas they can easily access to ensure that no Hamas fighters are left alive. They will destroy standing or partially standing structures outright by way of explosives, tank fire, or armored bulldozers. In the event that the IDF can identify openings to Hamas’s surviving network of underground tunnels, those tunnels will be permanently sealed off under piles of rubble, leaving those inside to flee elsewhere or perish of their own accord.

Israel has not directly disclosed the specific actions of its soldiers on the ground, describing a policy of intentional ambiguity designed to preserve as many operational advantages and lives as possible. However, while the tactical details remain vague, the overarching strategy has been explicitly confirmed: to take direct control of the vast majority of Gaza’s land area, entirely cleared of civilians, and to hold that ground to ensure Hamas cannot access civilian areas or humanitarian aid. If the IDF’s approach is successful, any Hamas fighters who have survived thus far will be isolated, left exposed, starved, and hunted down if they manage to endure.

Civilians, meanwhile, will be funneled into one of three small designated zones located in north, central, and south Gaza respectively.

Escalating Air Campaigns and the Humanitarian Blockade

At the same time as the ground invasion, Israel has pursued its air war in the Gaza Strip with an even greater ferocity than it has displayed in the past. Overnight on May 18th, Israel launched a massive wave of airstrikes in which it claimed to have successfully hit over 670 Hamas targets. Some 400 people or more were killed in the airstrikes over that single night, and more than 1,000 others were severely injured.

The following day, relentless Israeli strikes killed over 130 people and effectively destroyed one of the few remaining repositories of medical supplies that still existed within Gaza. Every day since the operation began, Israeli airstrikes have killed at least several dozen Gazans, ranging from thirty or forty on some days to well over a hundred on others. Particularly notable strikes include a devastating attack on May 20th targeting a school housing displaced families; a strike on a highly important regional hospital on May 23rd; an attack that killed nine of the ten children of a Gazan doctor in Khan Younis on May 24th; and a strike on a school that killed thirty-six individuals and wounded fifty-five in Gaza City on May 26th.

Just as important, and just as deeply troubling for the international community, has been Israel’s ongoing handling of essential humanitarian aid. For a period of ten weeks leading up to the new military operation, Israel instituted a complete and total blockade of aid flowing into Gaza. While Israel has since allowed small handfuls of trucks into the territory, those limited aid deliveries remain woefully inadequate to address the massive scale of human need.

Major humanitarian organizations have openly refused to keep working under Israel’s strictly enforced terms, insisting that the deliberate cutoff of aid to civilians represents an unacceptable violation of fundamental human rights and is completely unjustifiable as a tool to conduct a military offensive. While Israel has started working with a replacement aid network, that specific replacement has drawn intense skepticism and profound concern from both Palestinians and the broader international community. On Monday, May 26th, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation formally announced that it had started operations at designated distribution centers in southern Gaza.

However, according to reports directly on the ground, very few Palestinians have shown up to receive assistance—although desperation ultimately won out on the following day, when nearly 500,000 meals were reportedly handed out to starving residents. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is a United States-backed organization that, according to warnings from Hamas, will utilize biometric identification and tracking tools to strictly screen Gazans who approach their distribution centers to get aid. Those high-tech tools are purportedly meant to identify individuals with direct links to Hamas, or who may serve as foot soldiers within the militant group.

Many Gazans severely fear that if those surveillance tools are unreliable or are based on faulty data, they will be unjustly rounded up in sweeping dragnet operations meant for somebody else. Israeli officials have directly and openly acknowledged the plan to screen people receiving aid, citing the express purpose of denying and excluding anyone with suspected connections to Hamas. Furthermore, according to other global aid groups operating in the region, anyone receiving food aid will be forced to submit to advanced facial recognition software.

Because of these stringent parameters, the foundation has been entirely boycotted by the United Nations, the Red Cross, and other major international aid organizations. Even its own former executive director, Jake Wood, submitted a surprise resignation the day before aid distribution officially began, stating that the foundation will simply not be allowed to operate independently.

Shifting International Alliances and Unprecedented Outrage

Israel’s recent conduct inside the Gaza Strip has been heavily scrutinized, but just as unprecedented is the rapidly growing international outrage over Israel’s strategic actions. This fierce criticism is no longer emanating just from its longtime geopolitical adversaries, but crucially from some of its closest traditional allies. According to a broad range of international diplomatic sources, these allied countries have now lost any remaining patience with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The primary driver of this shift is the devastating one-two punch of Israel’s relentless, continued military assaults on Gaza combined with the deliberate cutoff of life-saving humanitarian aid from the besieged territory. In Europe, the diplomatic landscape has shifted dramatically. The United Kingdom has officially suspended trade negotiations with Israel, while France is expected to meet soon with Saudi Arabia to discuss a comprehensive two-state solution, before potentially taking the seismic step of formally recognizing a sovereign Palestinian state.

The leaders of both nations, Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, came together in a unified joint statement with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on May 19th to forcefully condemn Israel’s recent conduct. Quoting their shared declaration: “We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.”

Concurrently, the Prime Minister of Spain referred last week to Israel explicitly as a “genocidal state.” The Netherlands, historically considered a stalwart ally of Israel, is now actively leading an effort within the European Union to completely reconsider the bloc’s entire trade approach with Jerusalem. German leader Friedrich Merz firmly told a conference on Monday, May 27th, that the extreme suffering of Palestinian civilians “can no longer be justified,” and bluntly stated that “humanitarian international law is clearly violated” by Israel’s ongoing operational conduct.

Netanyahu has responded to these European leaders with characteristic fire and brimstone, loudly accusing the political leaders of France, Canada, and Britain of being “on the wrong side of humanity and on the wrong side of history.” Yet, the loudest signal that diplomatic dynamics are fundamentally changing among Israel’s allies is the stark reality that, after so many previous occasions where they were forced to swallow their criticism, this time Netanyahu’s outrage has left them entirely unmoved. Easily the most important diplomatic reversal of all comes directly from the United States.

According to reporting by Axios, the Trump administration has privately but forcefully urged Netanyahu to immediately draw down the expansive war and allow vital humanitarian aid shipments to resume. That marks a major and highly unexpected shift for an administration that had previously made unconditional support for Israel into a core political cornerstone, and that had recently advocated for depopulating Gaza entirely and transforming the coastal enclave into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” Although Trump has yet to take his deepening disagreements public, his recent high-profile trip to the region sent a message to Jerusalem that was received loud and clear.

In a sweeping three-stop tour across major Middle Eastern petrostates, Trump deliberately drew the United States closer to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, announcing lucrative deals with each respective nation worth many hundreds of billions of US dollars. Netanyahu, by glaring contrast, never received a visit during the highly publicized tour.

The “Mosquitos” Protocol and Changing Domestic Sentiment

As international outrage reached a fever pitch, an explosive investigative report published by the Associated Press added even more fuel to the geopolitical fire. That deeply concerning report, formally published on May 24th, drew extensively on several detailed interviews with former IDF soldiers and Gazan Palestinians. It explicitly alleged that the IDF had been actively using Gazan civilians as human shields since the very start of the grueling conflict.

The short summary of the findings is a profoundly horrifying one. As the AP describes it, the IDF has routinely and systematically forced Gazan civilians to enter houses and buildings that military commanders suspect may be heavily mined, booby-trapped, or intentionally set up as an ambush point for Hamas militants to utilize. Those unfortunate civilians, callously referred to in military parlance as “mosquitos,” would then be seamlessly passed around from military unit to military unit.

This grim practice is one that the IDF allegedly utilized in nearly every deployed platoon, according to the AP’s thorough investigation. According to the specific soldiers interviewed for the report, Israel routinely justified the highly controversial practice because it effectively sped up ground operations, substantially saved valuable ammunition, and fundamentally spared highly trained combat dogs from unnecessary injury or violent death. Israel has forcefully and consistently denied these severe allegations, insisting vehemently that the deliberate use of noncombatant civilians as human shields is strictly prohibited under their military doctrine.

However, in a brutal war where Israel has constantly, and accurately, accused Hamas fighters of cowardly hiding behind the dense civilian population of Gaza, the Israeli military itself now stands credibly accused of employing the exact same abhorrent tactics. A prominent whistleblower group comprised entirely of former Israeli soldiers has independently confirmed the core claims made by the AP after running their own separate, rigorous internal investigation. Inside Israel, broader public opinion appears to have shifted strongly and decisively against the ongoing war and the standing Netanyahu government.

In a recent, comprehensive round of national polling, approximately seventy percent of Israeli citizens explicitly endorsed an immediate end to the brutal war in the Gaza Strip in direct exchange for the safe release of the numerous hostages still held in Hamas captivity. Another revealing Israeli poll found that only about six-in-ten citizens actively supported a quick, decisive end to the war, but notably, a mere twenty-five percent of the Israeli public supported any long-term military occupation of the shattered Gaza territory. High-profile political figures within Israel have been increasingly emboldened to publicly and harshly condemn their own country’s aggressive conduct in Gaza.

Quoting former IDF Deputy Commander Yair Golan: “Israel is on the way to becoming a pariah state, like South Africa was, if we don’t return to acting like a sane country. A sane state does not wage war against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not set itself the goal of depopulating the population.” Echoing these severe sentiments, Moshe Ya’alon, a former Minister of Defense, commented directly on the horrific ‘hobby’ of killing babies that Golan had referenced, stating: “This is not a ‘hobby’, but a government policy, whose ultimate goal is to hold on to power.

And it is leading us to destruction.” Netanyahu and his staunch political allies have responded to these domestic critics with intense fire and brimstone. Yet, their standard condemnations simply have not carried the same weight or political impact as they reliably would have just a few short months ago.

The True Human Cost and Disputed Casualty Figures

The Netanyahu government’s aggressive actions continue to drive a profound shift in public opinion, especially as new expert analyses repeatedly suggest that the true death toll in Gaza may be considerably higher than either side has officially acknowledged. As of early May, the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health had documented nearly 53,000 people killed over the course of the grinding war, notably not distinguishing between innocent civilians and active combatants. Conversely, Israel currently estimates that it has successfully killed up to 17,000 Hamas fighters within that same timeframe.

However, a highly scrutinized recent study published by the Lancet attempted to find the truth by cross-referencing the official Israel-maintained casualty list and the Gaza Health Ministry list with their own independent database tracking deaths from traumatic injury through verified social-media obituaries. The researchers discovered a shockingly small overlap in specific victim counts between those three distinct lists. In practical terms, this glaring discrepancy means that deaths reliably reported in one list are highly likely not to be counted in the others.

Consequently, the actual death toll could logically be anywhere from forty-six percent higher to a staggering full 107 percent higher than the conservative death toll put out by the Gaza Health Ministry. According to detailed analysis by The Economist, that statistical adjustment could mean that anywhere from 77,000 to 109,000 Gazans may have been killed over the bloody course of the war—representing up to five percent of Gaza’s entire pre-war population. While it remains an admittedly imprecise counting mechanism that is inherently prone to systemic errors leading to either an undercount or an overcount, the rigorous study strongly indicates that the highest official death toll available is probably still a gross underestimation of the true human cost.

Political Survival and the Implications of a Prolonged War

The situation remains incredibly bleak for the suffering people of the Gaza Strip, particularly as the IDF and the Netanyahu government move relentlessly in pursuit of a crushing, total victory. Yet, the political situation is steadily growing more difficult for Israel as well, as Netanyahu finds himself increasingly abandoned by crucial international partners and deeply distrusted by his own citizenry. With both heavily entrenched sides desperately in need of a viable way out, it would be fair for external observers to suppose that a diplomatic breakthrough might finally be on the horizon.

Right now, however, that optimistic scenario simply does not seem to be the case. Unfortunately, analysts suggest Netanyahu has deliberately continued the devastating war until now for purely political reasons. Netanyahu currently remains on trial in three entirely separate corruption cases.

Furthermore, he has recently come under intense fire for abruptly dismissing the highly respected head of Israel’s domestic security agency after even more political trouble emerged. Crucially, he is generally not believed to possess the requisite public support to successfully renew his political mandate in a hypothetical new election. He has repeatedly and stubbornly refused to form new functional agreements to secure the safe release of hostages, even though 140 hostages have already been successfully released through previous ceasefires or other forms of strategic dealmaking, whereas a mere eight have been rescued alive by the IDF during active combat operations.

Netanyahu has always functioned as a very savvy political operator, often described as slippery at times, and he has consistently demonstrated a keen, overriding interest in retaining his grip on executive power. That deep suspicion is widely shared by a clear majority of the Israeli public, according to an extensive Israeli TV poll aired recently. According to that revealing poll, fifty-five percent of respondents firmly believed that Netanyahu’s main overarching goal right now is simply to remain in power at all costs, as opposed to less than forty percent who alternatively endorsed that his primary goal was to return Israeli hostages or win the war in Gaza.

Furthermore, fifty-three percent completely agreed that the single only reason Israel has not successfully reached a comprehensive deal to secure the release of more hostages is entirely a matter of Netanyahu’s selfish political interests. Half the respondents to that very same poll endorsed an even more troubling democratic possibility: that a scheduled set of national elections in Israel, currently slated for next year, could be outright cancelled on the flimsy legal basis of an ongoing national emergency. In that dark scenario, Netanyahu would inherently have to extend the brutal war long enough to legally justify cancelling elections that are definitively scheduled for late October 2026.

He would then need to ensure that the declared national emergency officially continues long enough that it would be far too late to simply revert back to that originally scheduled date. Polling already clearly showed that an overwhelming seventy percent of Israelis simply do not trust the Netanyahu government, and a strikingly similar number would vastly prefer that he resign immediately. If Netanyahu is indeed ruthlessly looking to cling to power by any means necessary, he will only find himself further emboldened by the extreme ultranationalist members of his own fragile political coalition.

Those fringe coalition members are acutely aware they aren’t likely to get another rare shot at being part of the nation’s ruling coalition for quite some time, and are highly incentivized to artificially preserve Netanyahu’s failing mandate. So are various senior officials within the top ranks of the IDF, who legitimately fear severe domestic or even international legal prosecutions for their battlefield actions. Without an Israeli government willing to negotiate, and with Operation Gideon’s Chariots already underway, mass Palestinian expulsion from the ruined territory of Gaza appears to remain fully on the table, and the tragic death toll will only continue its grim, unending rise.

Sources

1. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-army-human-shields-80f358dd2c87a1123f26ffada159701c
2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/24/israel-investigates-use-of-palestinians-as-human-shields-by-its-forces-in-gaza
3. https://www.axios.com/2025/05/25/israel-isolated-criticism-gaza-operation-aid
4. https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/an-exhausted-israeli-public-turns-against-war-in-gaza-233e133a
5. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj422k1zzd9o
6. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/26/israel-gaza-war-turning-point-uk-eu-changed
7. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-from-the-leaders-of-the-united-kingdom-france-and-canada-on-the-situation-in-gaza-and-the-west-bank
8. https://www.newsweek.com/why-israels-new-gaza-operation-different-2075452
9. https://www.cbsnews.com/video/what-to-know-about-the-controversial-aid-group-beginning-operations-in-gaza/
10. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/palestinians-wary-us-backed-aid-group-begins-operations-gaza-2025-05-27/
11. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-news-05-26-2025-6a7285f144a3619e8239138e6883b3b6
12. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9yjj54v3xo
13. https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-70-of-israelis-dont-trust-government-including-almost-half-of-coalition-voters/
14. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2025/03/netanyahu-poll-numbers/682008/
15. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/04/25/israeli-spy-chief-s-accusations-against-netanyahu-raise-political-crisis-to-new-peak_6740631_4.html
16. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-ambassador-to-us-accuses-netanyahus-political-opponents-of-blood-libel/
17. https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/a-calculus-of-conflict-netanyahus-political-survival-through-extended-war/
18. https://www.dw.com/en/netanyahu-faces-mounting-international-doubts-over-gaza-war/a-72688767
19. https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20250526-gaza-israeli-school
20. https://www.dw.com/en/gaza-dozens-of-people-killed-in-israeli-strikes/a-72664320\
21. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0eq9lq7xr1o
22. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/over-50-dead-or-missing-after-israeli-airstrike-levels-home-in-northern-gaza/3577159
23. https://www.euronews.com/2025/05/23/at-least-107-palestinians-killed-in-israeli-airstrikes-across-gaza-as-aid-continues-to-tri
24. https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israeli-airstrike-that-killed-top-hamas-leader-in-gaza-hit-meeting-of-top-militants-1573fc00
25. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-airstrikes-kill-79-palestinians-across-gaza/3574648
26. https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/israeli-pm-netanyahu-faces-political-pressure-from-right-flank-over-handling-of-gaza-aid-239983685954
27. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/syria-israel-direct-talks-focused-security-sources-say-2025-05-27/
28. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-hamas-gaza-strikes-dozens-dead-aid-controversy/
29. https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20250518-more-than-100-killed-overnight-in-israel-s-military-assault-on-gaza-all-hospitals-out-of-service
30. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-ground-offensive.html
31. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy90d929yyno
32. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-airstrike-kills-least-24-gaza-mediators-host-ceasefire-talks-2025-05-17/
33. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/18/gaza-ceasefire-talks-continue-as-israel-carries-out-fresh-wave-of-strikes
34. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-strikes-kill-dozens-gaza-criticism-israel-grows-2025-05-20/
35. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy67y8834yo